Monday, 5 May 2014


March 12, 2014 · by  · in Alternative NewsAncient British History,EntertainmentKing Arthur IIRoyalty 
ImageImagine what it’ll be like for children across the world to discover that Santa Claus is real and does in fact magically fly around the world in his sleigh, throwing down presents to the really good boys and girls.
Well, guess what, the adult’s version of Santa Claus, the myth and legend that we know to be King Arthur, is in fact a real historical figure, who was born in South Wales on Christmas Day 503 AD and who died 579 AD, in Kentucky America.
Join me as we embark on a journey back through time, to the land of our Ancient British forefathers.
Arthur: The War King.
Arthur: The War King available now from the book shop.
The Foreign powers occupying The British Throne since 1066 had to deal with the Arthurian memory. Having tried every trick in the book to extinguish his name, “King Arthur” would not go away, and so he was made a comic unreal figure of myth and legend.
We know about the life and death of King Arthur because ancient British history survived in a wealth of literature written in its ancient British alphabet of Coelbren.
The Coelbren alphabet can still be seen on pre-Christian coins and on ancient stones today, but how do you hide an ancient civilization with its own written histories and alphabet?
The problem was solved by simply declaring that the ancient British Coelbren Alphabet to be forgery of around 1800 AD. By turning a blind eye to the writings of Julius Caesar, Strabo, Ammianus Marcellinus, Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, historians are able to turn a blind eye to ancient British history.
This is what Wikipedia say about the ancient British Coelbren alphabet.
The real coelbren alphabet
The alphabet system consisted of twenty letters and twenty other representations of elongated vowels that resembled Ancient Greek and could be carved on four-sided pieces of wood and fitted into a frame he called a “peithynen”. Williams presented wooden druidic alphabets to friends and notables, and succeeded in persuading many of its authenticity.
And of Iolo Morganwg, The Literary Forger, Wikipedia say:
Edward Williams, better known by his bardic name Iolo Morganwg (10 March 1747 – 18 December 1826) was an influential Welsh antiquarian, poet, collector, and literary forger. He was widely considered a leading collector and expert on medieval Welsh literature in his day, but after his death it was revealed that he had forged a large number of his manuscripts. Regardless, he had a lasting impact on Welsh culture, seen most notably in his foundation of the Gorsedd, and the philosophy he developed in his forgeries had a huge impact on the early neo-druid movement. His bardic name is Welsh for “Iolo of Glamorgan”
Setting the record straight: Edward Williams did not fake the Coelbren language. How could he have forged a language with other people reference before he was born?
Baram Blackett & Alan Wilson
British History was flushed away down the drain by Edwin Guest and Biblical theology, and replaced with lies made up by a foreign occupying monarchy.
Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett wonder that almost without exception British historians and archaeologists are still blindly following the path laid down by this pseudo academic without question.
Proud to be British.
Every school-children’s ‘ancient British’ right to know about their ‘ancient British’ past.
No other National history is alleged to be a total forgery.
It was Bishops Stubb of Oxford, the eager disciple of Edwin Guest, who proclaimed that absolutely nothing whatsoever in the heritage of the new Anglo-Saxon England was owed to any way to any ancient British sources. All pre-Anglo-Saxon sources were played down and Anglo-Saxon achievement was played up. A massive and comprehensive chronicles of Ancient British History was banished to the newly created “Celtic fringe” and discredited.
Scholars easily labeled anyone who promoted an ancient British history as forgers and cranks, without needing to prove these allegations.
ImageTaken from The King Arthur Conspiracy by Grant Berkley, based on the work of Wilson and Blackett.
Until around 1700 AD the ancient traditional histories of Britain were firmly believed and published. The First was the tradition that the Geuantes – Gutian – Albyne had sailed with a fleet from Syria around 1600 BC, to seize the great Tin Island of Britain. This is evidenced from which archaeologists have called Wessex culture. The second migration was that of Brutus who sailed from Trojan Western Asia Minor in circa 504 BC and again another new advanced metal working culture erupted as if out of nowhere in Britain. The archaeologists prove what the “historians” deny. Overland migrations – probably of tribal groups are also mentioned in the records, but the two main organized large scale military migrations which were fixed firmly in the British mind were those of Albyne and Brutus.
These British histories were arbitrarily abandoned in England during the 18th and 19th centuries.
With an entire ancient history of a nation abandoned to the wind, something else had to take its place to fill the void. The something else was the invention of “British barbarism”, throwing aside evidence exhibiting that the British were:
  • Technically advanced
  • Literate
  • Cultured
  • An ordered nation.
Did you know that the founding of Christianity happened in Britain 35-37 AD, well before Rome knew about it? Of course you didn’t, I didn’t know before I discovered the work of Wilson and Blackett too.
The arrival of Christianity in Rome with the family of the British King Caradoc I in 51 AD is admitted by the Vatican, but not very loudly or too frequently. FACT- CHECK IT OUT.
Arthur’s Cross
The destruction of Arthurian Britain in 562 AD, after comet debris passed overhead, was born into folklore and historical record. Centuries later the romance writer on the sagas of King Arthur related the strange great blast, which wrecked the Great Castle and devastated the Arthurian Kingdom. They wrote of the Great Wastelands that held death for all who dared to enter, and amazingly none of this was believed to be factual and true.
The Dark Ages.
By denying the destruction of Britain by debris, comet or asteroids, from outer space in 562 AD, it was easily possible to pour scorn on the records that a great powerful and highly civilized British state had ever existed.
In place of the comet disaster, which overwhelmed the powerful 10 million strong British in 562 AD, there was to be a newly minted Anglo-Saxon Conquest.
Blackett, Wilson & Hall
Just how three boat-loads of Saxons, hired as coastguards by the usurper Gwrtheyrn (Vortigern) in the civil war raging in 426 AD, could defeat the military aggressive British who had evaded Gaul and seized all Western Europe under Magnus Maximus and his eldest son Arthur I in 383 AD with an army of 62,000, and repeated the act under a cousin Constantine Coronog- the Crowned, in 406 AD, is not explained.
Instead a new minimal population in ancient Britain was adopted. This nation instead of constantly defeating the Romans was now said to have been weak and cowardly and defeated by the Romans.
ImageHistory stood on its head.
History can never hide the fact that an ancient British Civilization were in Britain for a thousand years before the Angles and Saxons.
The first British King was King Brutus and it gets even better.
Prince Madoc, King Arthur II’s brother, discovered America in 562 AD, the same year the asteroid hit. Evidently he was out at sea when disaster struck and got blown all the way to America.  Of-course the entire event had to be obliterated, and the tale of a fleet of 700 ships sailing to America was declared a fiction, just as Troy was declared a fiction, as was King Arthur and those feet in ancient times that walked upon the green green grass of home, was declared but a lyric in a song.
Back to The King Arthur Conspiracy for this damning verdict.
Nothing can be assumed.
  • The first assumption is that the Romans conquered all Britain, wrong.
  • It is assumed that the Romans totally dominated Britain for either 450 or 400 years, incorrect.
  • It is assumed that early Christianity spread from Rome out Westwards across Europe to Britain,bunkum.
  • It is assumed that there was then a subsequent Anglo-Saxon conquest of Britain, wrong.
  • It is summed that the ancient British were barbarian “Celts”, nonsense.
  • It is assumed that the ancient British were of a low culture and illiterate, untrue.
  • It is assumed that they were few in number and they were primitive, wrong.
In short, all the most basic and fundamental points upon which any standard approach is made towards ancient British historical study is based upon are provably false assumptions.
There are two histories in Britain:
  • One is the phony version dreamed up and invented in the 19th Century.
  • The other is the real history of Britain, shrouded in a myopic fog of mis-directions, unfounded assumptions and indolence.
Join me again as we explore further the real life figure of King Arthur II and his Arthurian Kingdom.
Our Ancient British heritage brought to you for the first time in 1500 years by Matt Taylor, who needs your vote to be the MP for Brighton, Kemptown and Peacehaven in 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please show your appreciation with a donation.