James 'Bilton' Hind is Finished

It's looking more and more likely that James Hind, the most dangerous Troll on YouTube has finally been neutralised.

Thrown under the bus by his one time ally Shellie Mote, Hind's is looking more and more pathetic, vainly denying he's Richard James Bilton.

Pleading with an audience turned off by his constant lies, Hind wants us to believe Bilton is an innocent man.

What Hind is failing to appreciate is that the only reason the name Richard James Bilton is being mentioned, is because he messaged Shellie Mote using that identity.

Brighton Satanist Left a Laughing Stock....

James Hind, historian, satanist and comedian, has been left a laughing stock amongst Brighton's Satanic Covens, following the debacle of Shellie Mote revealing his real identity.

In a futile and desperate attempt to deny the obvious, Hind has issued as many lacklustre denials, as Peter did throwing his best mate J, under the bus....

Is James Hind Richard Bilton?

A very dangerous troll on the internet called James Hind, has had his real identity revealed to be Richard James Bilton from Morpeth Northumberland. James Hind denies it.

If you have reason to believe that someone is using a fake identity or engaging in online trolling or harassment, there are a few steps you can take to address the issue:

1. Document the behaviour: Collect evidence of the trolling behaviour, including screenshots, emails, or any other relevant communication. This will be useful in case you need to report the individual to the authorities or to online platforms.
2. Report the behaviour to the appropriate authorities: If you feel that someone is engaging in illegal or dangerous behaviour, it may be appropriate to report it to law enforcement. Alternatively, if the behaviour is occurring on a specific online platform (such as a social media site), report it to the platform's administrators.
3. Consider taking legal action: If you have evidence that the individual is engaging in illegal behaviour, you may wish to pursue legal action. Consult with a lawyer to discuss your options.
4. Protect yourself: If you are being targeted by a troll or online harasser, take steps to protect yourself. This may include changing your online habits, setting up additional privacy settings, or seeking support from friends, family, or a mental health professional.

It's important to remember that online harassment and trolling can be very distressing, but you don't have to deal with it alone. There are resources available to help you, including online support groups and organizations that specialize in dealing with cyberbullying and harassment.

Naming someone as a troll or harasser without solid evidence or proof can be potentially harmful and could open you up to legal consequences. It's important to have solid evidence before accusing someone of a serious offense, such as online harassment or trolling.

If you have reason to believe that James Hind is engaging in harmful online behaviour, it's important to gather as much evidence as possible before making any accusations. This could include screenshots of the offending behaviour, email correspondence, or other forms of communication that could be used to support your claim.

If you do decide to make an accusation, it's important to do so carefully and responsibly. Avoid making any statements that could be construed as defamatory or harmful to James Hind's reputation. Stick to the facts and avoid making any assumptions or allegations that you can't support with evidence.

It is generally not possible to legally harm the reputation of a pseudonym, as a pseudonym is not a legal entity and does not have a reputation to protect. However, if the pseudonym is being used to defame or harass individuals or organizations, it may be possible to take legal action against the person or entity behind the pseudonym.

In general, it is important to be careful when making statements online that could be interpreted as defamatory or harmful to someone's reputation, even if they are using a pseudonym. If you make false or damaging statements about someone, even if you don't know their real identity, you could be subject to legal action for defamation.

It's always a good idea to carefully consider the potential consequences of your online actions and to seek legal advice if you have concerns about the legality of your behaviour.

James Hind denies the allegation he is Richard James Bilton, and it's important to take his denial seriously and consider the possibility that others may be mistaken. If you continue to have concerns about his behaviour, consider seeking the advice of a legal professional or other expert who can help you evaluate the evidence and determine the best course of action.

If you believe that James Hind is actually Richard James Bilton, there are a few steps you can take to try to confirm this information:

1. Conduct additional research: Look for additional information or evidence that could confirm James Hind's real identity. This could include online profiles, public records, or news articles that mention Richard James Bilton.
2. Seek legal advice: If you have strong evidence that James Hind is actually Richard James Bilton, consider seeking legal advice to determine the best course of action. An attorney can help you evaluate your options and advise you on the potential risks and benefits of taking action.
3. Report the behaviour: If you believe that James Hind is engaging in harmful or illegal behaviour, such as trolling or harassment, consider reporting it to the appropriate authorities or online platforms. Be sure to include any evidence you have that links James Hind to Richard James Bilton.

It's important to approach this situation carefully and responsibly, and to avoid making any false or defamatory statements about James Hind or Richard James Bilton without solid evidence to support your claims.

You Lose when you start calling people names!

In any argument, there is bound to be disagreements and differing opinions. However, resorting to name-calling and personal attacks can be a sign of weakness and an indication that one has lost the argument. When people start using names like 'bitter', 'malicious', 'revenge-seeking', 'attention-seeking grifter', and 'scumbag', it shows that they are unable to make a logical and well-reasoned argument to support their position. Instead, they resort to ad hominem attacks, which are aimed at discrediting the character of their opponent rather than their arguments.

Name-calling is a form of verbal abuse that serves no constructive purpose in an argument. It is a cheap shot, meant to undermine the credibility of the person being attacked. This type of behavior is not only disrespectful, but it can also be hurtful and damaging. Name-calling has the potential to escalate an argument and make it more volatile, which is counterproductive to finding a resolution. When people use words like 'bitter', 'malicious', 'revenge-seeking', 'attention-seeking grifter', and 'scumbag', they are not contributing to a healthy debate.

Furthermore, name-calling can also be a sign of insecurity and a lack of confidence in one's own position. When people feel that they are losing an argument, they may resort to personal attacks as a way to deflect attention away from their weak arguments. They may use name-calling as a way to distract from the fact that they are unable to make a convincing argument.

Using words like 'bitter', 'malicious', 'revenge-seeking', 'attention-seeking grifter', and 'scumbag' can also be a form of projection. When people use these words, they may be projecting their own negative qualities onto their opponent. For example, someone who is bitter and resentful may accuse their opponent of being bitter, when in fact, it is they who are experiencing those emotions. This type of behavior is not only unfair but can also be misleading.

In conclusion, resorting to name-calling and personal attacks in an argument is a sign of weakness and an indication that one has lost the argument. Words like 'bitter', 'malicious', 'revenge-seeking', 'attention-seeking grifter', and 'scumbag' are not only disrespectful but also unhelpful in resolving a disagreement. Using personal attacks can escalate an argument and create more tension, which is counterproductive to finding a resolution. When people engage in name-calling, they are not contributing to a healthy debate and are instead undermining the credibility of their own position. Therefore, it is essential to remain respectful and to focus on the issues rather than attacking the character of one's opponent.