Sunday, 26 September 2021
Friday, 24 September 2021
Analyzing May!
"I'm going to shed some light on this, it's going to be a bit of a, um, as far as I know this is, um, Matt's, isn't it?"
Yes Shellie, Taylor's Freedom is mine, Matt Taylor! As is Mr X Investigations, Guerrilla Democracy News, Matt Taylor Writer, Exposing the Hoaxtead Trolls, Hoaxturd Trolls Watch, About Matt Taylor and a few more such as Taylor Investigations and more X-rated one's, such as Taylor's Sex Tales!!!
I'm a blogger, "don'cha know", as Chris Spivey would say! (Some people even accuse me of being a "pathetic attention hog!")
"Um, right what I'm going to say to all of you lot, and TA Rogers, (who is Matt), you're all a bunch of fucking freaks."
Wow, from the firing pistol going off, here we have Shellie May building up to her big reveal, by telling us she's going to "say", something before actually saying it.
A lot of people just like to say it, as I like to say it too! I'm not one to ask to ask a question, I just ask the question, without asking!
Sadly its an indication of low self esteem and a lack of confidence. Its a subconscious 'tipping your toe into the cold waters,' type of scenario, in which the person doing it, (as in Shellie's case) forewarns everyone ahead of what she is planning to do, because if she does see any objections and trouble waiting in store for saying it, she can quickly back-track on her bravado, and crawl back under the rock she same from!
"What I'm going to say to all of you a lot, and TA Rogers," to which I'm sure she said, "who is Matt," "You're all a bunch of fucking freaks."
To be brutally honest with you, when I read a sentence like that, (from someone I've never met, and with whom I've had no dealings, whether business, personal or professional); I lose a tiny part of my will to live!
We can only go by what she says, and I'm sure I heard her say, "TA Rogers, who is Matt," but I could be wrong!
"You're all a bunch of fucking freaks!"
After such a big build-up, we get left feeling disappointed and cheated with such a limp dick of a punchline.
It says more about the mental and emotional age of the person, by the punchlines they deliver.
Shellie's punchline was an insult, and a rather unimaginative insult at that too. "Fucking Freaks!"
"Fucking Freaks!"
But what does that actually mean?
According to Wikipedia -
A freak is a person who is physically deformed or transformed due to an extraordinary medical condition or body modification. This definition was first attested with this meaning in the 1880s as a shorter form of the phrase "freak of nature", itself a broader term attributed at least as far back as 1847.[1] The term's original neutral connotation became entirely negative during the 20th century; therefore, freak with its literal meaning of "abnormally developed individual" is viewed purely as a pejorative today.[2][3] However, the term is also recently used playfully to refer to an enthusiast or obsessive person.
Surely you're not going to publicly mock me for any physical deformity I may have?
She must then surely be playfully calling me a "Fucking Freak", as a nod and acknowledgement to my prowess as an Alpha Male, and to my rather enthusiastic and obsessive nature!
So on this occasion, I'll take her opening insult of "Fucking Freak," as a compliment and a gesture of pent up and denied sexual attraction and lust towards me!
Don't hide or fight your feelings towards me Shellie; you aren't the first witch to fall for my manly charms, and you won't be the last!
"Matt you've been around too many kids and too many women, so you’ve got nothing to say."
What actually do you mean Shellie? "Too many kids and too many women." I really am puzzled as to what you are getting at?
I spoke to my 28 year old niece tonight. The one who stabbed a man, and who hears voices in her head. (She never stabbed a man, because any voices told her to, I hasten to add. She stabbed the man because he wouldn't left her leave his flat.)
I remember my 28 year old niece Abby, (and her older sister Amy aged 31) as if it was only yesterday, Amy and Abby as little babies, growing up from toddlers, primary school kids, teenagers, young women, and now well on their way to middle age.
I've been there through every phase from baby to adulthood.
I was aged 17 and I had escaped from a childhood living with two women to the South of France. I was all set to become a Frenchman and find a new life for me on the French Riviera.
Sadly while working as a grape picker, I got a letter from my mother saying my sister, (aged 14) was pregnant, and pleading for me to return to England, and help out financially.
It happened to me again when I was building a new life for myself in Hong Kong. I got a letter from my mother telling me my sister had started to use heroin, and that I was needed back home to protect my mother and my nieces from the dreadful abuse of a heroin addict, whose only care in life to where their next fix is coming from.
I've got 31 cousins, 14 aunts and uncles on my mother's side; so yes, I have been around lots of children.
And then there are my own two children, now aged 11 and 15. Both intelligent, attractive and popular kids.
As for women! WOW! I made a promise to myself way back when I was a teenager!
With the hormones raging and the mere flash of a girl's blossoming cleavage sending teenage temperatures soaring, I remember being disgusted with all my mates who went with all the nasty, dirty, cheap, slutty girls, that all the other boys had been with!
I remember making a promise to myself, (which I've kept ever since), that I would only date the most beautiful women in the world!
So yes; while I have had many women, you can never have "too many" women!
Every father knows the young bull joke; where a young bull and his father cross the crest of a hill and see a whole field of cows below them.
The young bull looks at his father and says, "Hey Dad, lets run down and fuck one of them!"
To which the father replies, "Or we can take our time, and fuck'em all!!!!!"
"This is rude, this is rude!"
I am a middle aged man, who has traveled the world, fathered two wonderful children, been in the Army and Black Operations of national and global security. I've made many friends and more enemies. I push boundaries and I fight for Royal Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth.
I fight for King Arthur II. I fight for the elimination of war, poverty and child abuse. I fight to Right the Wrongs of Mankind. I fight for John Wanoa, Andy Devine, John Paterson, Edward Ellis and for all the children of the world.
For you to call me "a Predator", and "a Danger to women and children" is very hurtful and I take extreme offence to any suggestion, other than I am a loving man, who is sound of mind, and who has a loving family, and relationships which keep me grounded, against these ridiculous and malicious videos I watch about myself, by idiots called Shellie Mote (or is it May?)
These pricks can never get their own names right! Is it Muttley or is it Reece? Mote or May? Fran or Nadia? Hind or Vayne?
(I'm not a snowflake, and I don't tolerate snowflakes gladly... Shellie May is the biggest snowflake I've had the misfortune to cross paths with....)
I love kids as much as the next man, (but I couldn't eat a whole one), and I certainly haven't "been around too many kids and too many women."
Your underhanded jibes and insults aren't clever and they aren't impressing anyone except yourself.
I don't support a 40-year-old man who claims to be so "haunted," by "low scale child abuse," when he was "aged 6", that he became a 12-year-old boy online decoy, to "identify and remove paedophiles", but in truth and practice, protected the paedophiles he identified, by failing to report them.
In 2018 Hinds reason to go undercover as a 12-year-old boy was:
“For personal and business reasons I want to learn more about the paedophiles, their process of grooming in chatrooms, the impact they have on their victims, what the police and paedophile hunters are doing, and what the children feel, experience, think and act with regards to these paedophiles.”
Three years later in 2021, his reason changes to:
“I was haunted by questions: why was I abused? what did I do wrong? why did the person abuse me?“
How many pre-teen and teenager's lives has James Hind ruined, by failing to report their abusers to police, when he had the "opportunity" to?
Shellie May sells yourself as a champion of children, Safeguarding Queen, and Empress of Truth, Integrity and Evidence; when in truth and practice, (my new catch-phase!) she defends and protects a self confessed satanists, who doesn't defend himself against charges of paedophilia, following his 2018 confession that he acted as a 12-year-old boy decoy, with the promise to "identify and remove paedophiles," but in reality went onto actively protect them by failing to report them.
How many children's lives has James Hind ruined, by failing to report the paedophiles he identified online? (See Poll above)
'Empress of Truth, Integrity and Evidence', when Shellie May has failed to provide any evidence that I am a "three times convicted stalker," as she is so keen to repeat like a parrot!
You are wrong Shellie May and you know it, but yet you haven't got the "INTEGRITY", to admit it.
"Now, so disturbing this is? How dare he?"
By looking at the video, you know she's referring to what I've written about James Hind, when she expresses her horrified reaction to the warnings that what James Hind said three years ago, on his Satanic Views blog, did contain material of a child abuse nature, and that you wasn't to read 'Is James a paedophile', if you had a sensitive disposition.
Yes, I agree its very (X6) disturbing that James Hind pretended to be a 12-year-old boy decoy on a notorious pre-teen/teen online social media site, which the intention to "identify and remove paedophiles," only to protect the paedos he identified by not reporting them.
And it isn't just that!
His reasons for doing so don't add up. First it was to understand everything about paedophilia:
“For personal and business reasons I want to learn more about the paedophiles, their process of grooming in chatrooms, the impact they have on their victims, what the police and paedophile hunters are doing, and what the children feel, experience, think and act with regards to these paedophiles.”
Then it was to answer "haunting" questions, that should have been answered during his group therapy sessions in 2019, and his individual therapy sessions in 2020 and 2021.
“I was haunted by questions: why was I abused? what did I do wrong? why did the person abuse me?“
And of-course compounded by the fact he's the leading (self pro-claimed) crusader against child abuse (by reporting anyone to the police, courts and Attorney General for breaking court Orders), to being a self confessed satanist.
A 'Satanist' for God's sake!
Who on Earth, other than brain dead idiots, would want to identify with a pagan medieval deity, famed for wickedness, sin and evil?
Its more than stupid, its pitiful and pathetic.
Who on Earth would end their monologue with: "I am a witch, I am an angel, I'm a shaman, I'm an Elohim from the Emerald Order, I am an Indigo! My laws are spiritual law."
Who says this kind of shite?
Who praises the Tenet of The Satanic Temple of the freedoms of others being respected, including the freedom to offend, only to then get butt hurt over an innocent passing remark, and to then willfully and unjustly encroach upon my freedoms (and the well-being of my children,) by maliciously reporting me to the police for obsession, fixation, harassment and stalking.
Who does this shite?
To answer Shellie May's Yoda phased question, "Disturbing this is? How dare he?" The answer is simples; I'm exposing the arse-holes who attack me.
I've mentioned this before in other blogs, and I'm happy to repeat it again:
I remember it started with renewed vigor in August 2020, when Hind wrote a message in a YouTube chat-room aimed towards me, which I perceived as a ‘Vow of Revenge‘.
James Hind has no right to call me “a predator” and “danger to women and children”. No right to call me “a menace to society”, and deserving of being “locked up in prison”. James Hind has no right to publicly state that he’s going to keep “an eye on me,” to spread false rumours that I have “three stalking convictions”, and that there are currently “three complaints against me.”
James Hind has no right to interfere in my life.
The question must be asked to Hind too, HOW DARE YOU?
"Now Matt and all of your little friends and whoever your bitches are, we, I’ve reported Jeanette to the courts okay, my evidence went with that as well, now who else has been in contempt? Let's have a think."
OK, lets break it down and address this section by section:
"Now Matt and all your little friends and whoever your bitches are."
You are so rude Shellie! I've never come across this type of viciousness, cruelty and spitefulness ever in my life!
You are truly a revelation as to how stupid a person could be!
"Your little friends," and "bitches."
You can always join my Harem Shellie, I'm happy to make room for one more 'witch,' like you.
"We, I’ve reported Jeanette to the courts okay, my evidence went with that as well, now who else has been in contempt? Let's have a think."
Its worthy of note, to point out the only members of the once great and influential Hoaxtead Research community to publicly come out in defense of James Hind, has been Shellie May, Nadia, Pebbles, CoCo, Noncey-Nonce-Boy and JoKing.
Its very telling that the core inner group of Hoaxtead Research, (Karen Irving, Richard Dougall, Thomas Niedermeier and Sheva Burton) have failed to publicly comment.
They remember this from 2018, and they remember warning Hind that he was playing with fire, and that he should stop forthwith.
Read more: Even Nonce-Nonce-Boy warned him.
We now know with certainty that James Hind has pretended to be a 12-year-old boy on notorious pre-teen/teenager/paedo online chat-rooms, from between 2018 to 2021.
Three years of mastering the skills, practices and methods of pretending to be someone else online, with the intention to build intelligence to "identify and remove paedophiles," which we know in Hind's case, he failed to do.
With this in mind, James Hind could have been anyone online. He could be behind all those YouTube channels, which he's so eager to accuse me of being behind.
Only Hind knows the true extent of his deceptiveness online and the number of paedophiles he's protected, and allowed free to carry on destroying the lives of our children.
I am truly disgusted with James Hind, and anyone who continues to stand with him.
The only reason Shellie May is reminding us that she also reported Jeanette Archer to the police, Mold Court and the Attorney General, is to deflect half the criticism being directed towards Hind, to herself.
Out of all the Hoaxtead Research community, its Shellie May leading the charge in coming to Hind's indefensible defense!
She asks the question, "who else has been in contempt, lets have a think?"
Read more: James Hind in Contempt of Court Order A20200067
"Matt, you’re in contempt but not for that. Angie was in contempt and actually um, put witnesses in danger."
You are an idiot Shellie May, and you really mustn't spread lies and mis-truths, while at the same time pretending to be a champion of 'Truth,' 'Evidence' and 'Integrity.'
Trust me, if I was in contempt of any Court Orders, Sussex Police would have smashed by door in at 5am, last Sunday morning!
I am not in contempt of any court order, unlike James Hind is for mentioning the sentencing in a certain Harassment case, I am not allowed to mention due to Court Order A2020067.
Remember: The court order restrictions placed upon my trial is NOT for my benefit, but for benefit of the children, of which James Hind, has now put in danger and potential harm of alarm, distress and fear.
"Jeanette's definitely been in contempt, twice three times, and as for Owen Lucas, yeah!"
Who's little-miss-gossip? She knows everyone's business, Angela Power-Disney, Jeanette Archer and Owen Lucas. And to imply that Angela put any "witnesses in danger," is absolutely ridiculous, and an indication of how low Shellie, (and her "little friends," and "bitches,") go to twist the truth and distort reality.
Its a classic satanic trick, which Shellie May has perfected as part of her witch-craft practice.
"So why are you calling people paedophiles?"
I'm asking the question; "Is James Hind a paedophile," based on his 2018 Satanic View blog, in which be confesses to being a 12-year-old boy decoy, set-up to "identify and remove" any paedos he may find, only to freely admit to failing to report a paedo from Kent, because he didn't want to "ruin" "lives."
"It is not in my nature to be the cause of the ruin of the lives of others unlike the hunters, I don’t like that on my mind.”
"And Matt, you’re still being questioned, so how many, how many kids have you shown videos now Matt?"
Ohhhhh, Shellie May is preempting the conclusion of an active police investigation. Does Shellie May know anything about videos being shown in the woods? A referral to Sussex Police would be in order!
Isn't it a bit of an assumption to make, without any shred of evidence, when you sell yourself as a virtue of 'truth,' 'integrity' and 'evidence?'
Where is your evidence that I'm "still being questioned?" And while we are in the subject of evidence, where is the evidence that:
- I am "convicted predator"
- I am a "danger to women and children"
- I have "three convictions for stalking"
You come out with such tripe, you really do.
A Christmas Horror Story: It was a Christmas nightmare I'd never forget. Hounded by the police at my door, night and day for 5 days, while I hid under the bed, too scared to let them in, in fear of being murdered. After the 5th day of hiding out in my own home, the police threatened to smash my door in, and after opening and letting them in, was arrested for taking three teenage boys into the woods to have sex with, after them showing them videos of beheadings. After the customary 10-16 hours in a God forsaken police cell, I was questioned on 21 December 2020, during which I answered all the questions the police asked. I was released under bail until 19 January 2021. Come 19 January 2021, bail was extended to June 2021. Come June the bail conditions were dropped, but the investigation remains open. Read more at Guerrilla Democracy News - 50th Birthday Surprise/Christmas Horror!
"How many? How many women have you dragged in even though you're a stalker?"
What are you asking? How many women are in my life, as opposed to how many girlfriends I have in my life, how many cougars in my neighbourhood I sleep with behind my magical imaginary girlfriend's back, or all the other witches I have phone-sex with?
I've always had women around me in life. My mother always said that it was better to have no dad, rather than a bad dad!
Judge Dredd was my magical imaginary dad, and your didn't get more bad-arse than Judge Dredd!
"How man women have you dragged in even though you're a stalker?"
Why are you so interested Shellie May? I've already offered you an invite to my Harem. I've always got time for a wicked witch to satisfy my wicked needs!
"This is rude, this is rude!"
For the millionth time, I am not a stalker and I haven't dragged in any women to my Harem. They all cum willingly and are free to leave whenever they wish.
The women in my life stay close and loyal to me, because I meet all the physical, emotional and spiritual needs!
"I'm a Gigolo!"
"Now for Matt of all people, who's the weirdest fucker I’ve ever come across, and his bitches, this is rude, this is rude."
Arhhhh, isn't that sweet. Both Shellie May and Kaley's BF Den Tarragon share something in common! They both refer to me as "the weirdest fucker," - "the weirdest person," they've ever "come across."
Leaving my bitches out of it Shellie May, I am a rude boy. I'm a bad boy and what are you going to do about it, other than run to the Headmaster (The Police,) and cry like a baby that I'm not fawning for you, like all the other boys do...
BAD BOYS
Woo-woo
Dear mommy, dear daddy
You had plans for me, oh yeah, I was your only son
And long before this baby boy could count to three
You knew just what he would become
Run along to school
No child of mine grows up a fool
Run along to school
When you tried to tell me what to do
I just shut my mouth and smiled at you
One thing that I know for sure
Bad boys
Stick together, never, sad boys
Tu-tu-tu-tur woo-woo
Good guys
They made rules for fools so, get wise
Tu-tu-tu-tur-tu-tur
Dear mommy, dear daddy
Now I'm nineteen as you see
I'm handsome, tall and strong
So what the hell gives you the right to look at me
As if to say, "Hell, what went wrong?"
Where were you last night?
You look as if you had a fight
Where were you last night?
Well, I think that you may just be right
But don't try to keep me in tonight
Because I'm big enough to break down the door
Bad boys
Stick together, never, sad boys
Tu-tu-tu-tur woo-hoo
Good guys
They made rules for fools so, get wise
Tu-tu-tu-tur-tu-tur
Boys like you, are bad through and through.
Still
Girls like me, always seem to be with you
We can't help but worry
You're in such a hurry
Mixing with the wrong boys
Playing with the wrong toys
Easy girls, and late nights
Cigarettes, and love bites
Why do you have to be so cruel?
You're such a fool
Bad boys
Stick together, never, sad boys
Tu-tu-tu-tur woo-woo
Good guys
They made rules for fools so, get wise
Tu-tu-tu-tur-tu-tur
Bad boys
Stick together, never, sad boys
Tu-tu-tu-tur woo-woo
Good guys
They made rules for fools so, get wise
Tu-tu-tu-tur-tu-tur
Woo
Song by Michael George
"I mean paedos don't go down the woods with kids or have anything on the internet, do they, um Matt?"
Ask your mate James Hind about paedophiles, because by all accounts he's the expert on the subject of paedophilia. According to his own testimony he's engrossed himself into the world of paedophilia since 2018, when he went under cover as a 12-year-old boy decoy, to "identify and remove," paedophiles from a notorious pre-teen/teenager online chatroom, (already monitored by police.)
"Absolutely disgusting, Matt Taylor you’re a fuck up and so are all your friends, so is everyone you’re with."
No Shellie; you are absolutely disgusting to defend James Hind. You are absolutely disgusting to call for my female friends and supporters, to be either slapped or sectioned for supporting me!
How dare YOU?
You are a no-body wannabe, just like all the others, who have decided to pick a fight with me, because I'm perceived as the weakest link and the most vulnerable chink in the chain.
It says more about your character than it does mine, that you discard your own high standards of 'truth,' 'evidence' and 'integrity,' when you attack me, my friends and supporters.
"Now, unless you’re got some evidence of this Matt? Looks like you, you’ve just got yourself in big big big trouble again."
Unlike you Shellie Mote, everything I publish is backed up with FACTS and EVIDENCE! That is why I've never to prosecuted for anything I've written.
I asked the question, Is James Hind a paedophile? Based on his own Satanic View blogs on 2018. My evidence is his words!
Read the blog you fool, because by asking the question, "Now, unless you've got some evidence of this Matt," makes it look like you haven't....
"So yeah, the majority of us who have got any education or safeguard training or anything like that, will report people that are breaking laws around protected children."
With her past, I wouldn't want any children around her. No doubt any school she worked at, weren't aware of her past, and her childhood trauma.
All too often it seems the people who are the loudest in calling out other people to be the paedophiles, are more often than not the paedophiles, deflecting attention away from themselves.
"I've done it, many others have done it, it's all coming out in the end."
"It’s all coming out, the whole lot, so you can bitch and you can try and put people down, and you can do what you want but guess what?"
"Even as far as Ireland, you're going to be pulled out, and it's easy because you lot, you see the problem is, you like so many videos of yourselves over the years, wow, there’s a catalogue, so um yeah, it's very very very very very very disturbing."
Fucking hell Shellie May, how old are you? Very X 6! You remind me of the stupid bitch at the front of the class who said "very," six times to really empathise how serious it was that Jimmy said "boo," to a goose!
"Matt, you seem to have a sexual obsession with what [inaudible] did in my childhood, that was when I was a baby, I mean that's creepy as."
Leaving the best and (most revealing) to last, here we have Shellie May bringing a 'baby,' into the equation, proving once and for all, what a manipulative, satanic, evil witch she really is!
No Shellie Mote, I am not sexually obsessed with anything to do with you, and to imply I'm interested in anyway shape or form, with the abuse you went through as a child, is more an indication of your manipulative, evil and satanic nature, than it is of me.
"Creepy as."
I have never mentioned anything about when you were "a baby."
Shellie May has revealed to the world that, quote:
"When I was a child, I was 4 years old, my indoctrinated grandmother used to take me to the priests for confession."
"At 4 years old! Because I had the Devil in me. When in actual fact was that my mother was a diagnosed criminal psychopath, who indeed ritualistically abused her child, and quite sadistically."
"Yet it still wasn't Satan."
"I'm not a satanist, I am a witch. I am an angel. I'm a shaman. I'm an Elohim from the Emerald Order. I am an Indigo. My laws are spiritual law."
Never once was the word "baby," used, and Shellie May is including it to muddy the waters, and start a new malicious rumour against me, that I'm sexually obsessed with her as a baby! (or some other insidious bullshit!)
Shellie May is a danger to men, women, children and animals. (Especially chickens and rabbits!)
"King Arthur, um what a load of shit, you're full of shit. You Matt Taylor, you are a danger to society, absolute danger to society.""
The fact you call King Arthur, "what a load of shit," simply tells me Shellie May doesn't watch Britain's Hidden History show every Sunday at 8pm only on YouTube, and nor has she joined Britain's Hidden History Facebook group!
She sounds a right twit, saying, "You Matt Taylor! You are a danger to society, absolute danger to society!"
Give your head a wobble Shellie May, you sound like a loony!
Wednesday, 22 September 2021
Analysing Hind's Response!
Sourced from TaylorsFreedom.wordpress.com
Addressing the false allegations of Satan Hunter Matt Taylor
"Recently, I had to write a post in answer to the Satan Hunter Matt Taylor from Brighton UK, who tried to get at me by repeating the false allegations of one Nathaniel Harris. Not done with trying to ruin the name and life of an innocent man that was not me with fictional allegations, Matt Taylor has now reproduced a comment I made to Hoaxtead a couple of years ago on the subject of my work fighting paedophiles."
Right, first, I DO NOT identify as a "Satan Hunter."
Hind seems happy to label everyone as a "Satan Hunter," and it is getting old, stale and boring.
My relationship with Santa is my business and our relationship is between him and I.
As with every child in the Western hemisphere, Santa holds a very special, dear and cherished spot in my heart. I remember him peering up at from from the toilet bowl, petrifying me whenever I had to go to wee during the night.
I remember with fondness when Santa used to put me to bed, and sit with me for a while, as I drifted off into a deep sleep, only to wake up feeling refreshed and eager to get on with life.
Santa has given me everything I could ever wish for in life and has been my father figure, alongside other great heroes such as Judge Dredd, Slain, The Six Billion Dollar man and The Hulk!
Only JoKing; my father was a satanic cult leader and my mother was a black witch princess, an angel, a shaman, an Elohim from the Emerald Order, an Indigo, a lover of the Gods and Santa.
I am certainly not a "Satan Hunter," as that stupid prick James Hind likes to call me, (and everyone else.)
I personally pity him as a man of low EQ and a permanent heightened sense of doom that his cover will be blown, and he'll be exposed for what he really is.
I like to call him a "Santa-Hater-Hunter," as a jibe against him. For the record, I love Santa and treat him as my father.
"Who tried to get at me by repeating the false allegations of one Nathaniel Harris"
I am not trying to get James Hind by repeating anything Nathaniel has said. I am merely responding to the constant stalking and harassment I've receiving from James Hind and his satanic cult members.
I remember it started with renewed vigor in August 2020, when Hind wrote a message in a YouTube chat-room aimed towards me, which I perceived as a 'Vow of Revenge'.
James Hind has no right to call me "a predator" and "danger to women and children". No right to call me "a menace to society", and deserving of being "locked up in prison". James Hind has no right to publicly state that he's going to keep "an eye on me," to spread false rumours that I have "three stalking convictions", and that there are currently "three complaints against me."
James Hind has no right to interfere with my life.
I am purely making public what Nathaniel Harris has said to me via comments left on my Exposing the Hoaxtead Trolls blog.
Read more: Public Apology to Nathaniel Harris
If someone left a message on either Hoaxtead Research or Satanic Views blogs, that I am "somehow," connected to the Batley satanic sex cult, then of-course either Karen Irving or James Hind would bring that information to the attention of a wider audience.
I am simply doing the same.
Taking into consideration that James Hind confesses to be a member of The Satanic Temple, and pretends to be a 12 year old boy, in notorious paedophile/pre-teen/teen online chat-rooms; it isn't surprising that more questions would be asked.
(Isn't it hilarious that Shellie May is the first to come to his defense LMFAO!)
"Not done with trying to ruin the name and life of an innocent man that was not me with fictional allegations, Matt Taylor has now reproduced a comment I made to Hoaxtead a couple of years ago on the subject of my work fighting paedophiles."
In my opinion as an ex-Royal Military Policeman, trained in taking witness statements, looking for inaccuracies in speech and writing styles and general detection of deception; I believe both James Hind and Julian Vayne, are one of the same person.
Read more - Prince Charles's Statement Analysis
He has failed to convince me he isn't Julian Vayne, and until more compelling evidence can be produced, my opinion will remain the same; (though I am open, and would be pleased to be proved wrong.)
James is factually correct to say I reproduced a comment he made to Hoaxtead a couple of years ago on the subject of fighting peadophiles.
“As a victim of child abuse I recognise the harm that false allegation makers do, not only that they destroy lives of those that they make false allegations against, but also the harm they do to real victims of child abuse.”
But he's factually incorrect to say he's fighting paedophiles. He didn't fight any paedophiles, but in fact pretended to be one. He pretended to be a 12 year old boy, and he failed to report another paedophile he identified from Kent to the police, while he boasts about reporting Sharon Gale, Jeanette Archer, Angela Power-Disney, Sam Baldwin and Owen Lucas to the police!
.
So Hell Yes, I reproduced a comment he made on Hoaxtead Research in 2018, and its damn lucky I did too, otherwise none of you would be the wiser, that the pathetic piece of scum, protected by the likes of May, Poodles, Pebbles, Coco, JoKing and Noncey-nonce-boy; pretended to be a 12 year old boy in notorious paedophile infested, pre-teen and teen online chat-rooms, claiming to fight paedophile, when in actual fact, he protected them, by failing to report them.
"To start with, Taylor unkindly drew attention to a comment I made that I had been sexually abused as a child."
No, I did not in anyway shape or form intend to be "unkind" towards James Hind, by reproducing his public confession, that he was a victim of child-abuse.
"As a victim of child abuse I recognise the harm that false allegation makers do, not only that they destroy lives of those that they make false allegations against, but also the harm they do to real victims of child abuse.”
I'm a victim of child abuse too, and would never do anything to be "unkind," to another victim.
I reproduced the quote to highlight Hind's hypocrisy that he acknowledges false allegations destroy lives, but yet repeats false allegations about myself, and creates new and varied allegations on a weekly basis; such as I'm the owner behind numerous YouTube channels.
"This sex abuse was at the lower end of scale of sexual abuse, that I suffered at the age of six, along with my younger brother."
While Hind's sexual abuse was at the lower end of the sexual abuse scale, the physical, emotional and sexual abuse, I received growing up, was near the middle to higher end of the scale.
Read about my History of CSA
"The events of the [CENSORED] had over time triggered me, and in 2018 I reported the sex abuse to the police. Via the NHS I had PTSD group sessions in 2019 and individual therapy sessions in 2020/21."
So, Hind wants us to believe that as a victim of sexual abuse, (at the lower end of the sexual scale of abuse), a 2014 case in London, (which I cannot name for legal reasons), triggered a response in him over a 4 year period, which culminated in him reporting his child-hood sexual abuse to the police in 2018.
I pray I have got that accurate, and hope any reader who knows better, would correct me if I have got any facts wrong.
Symptoms of PTSD
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder include flashbacks, nightmares, feeling very anxious and difficulty sleeping.
Someone with PTSD often relives the traumatic event through nightmares and flashbacks, and may experience feelings of isolation, irritability and guilt.
They may also have problems sleeping, such as insomnia, and find concentrating difficult.
These symptoms are often severe and persistent enough to have a significant impact on the person's day-to-day life.
I don't know how old James Hind is, but estimate him to be in his early 40's. He wants us to believe that during child-hood he suffered child abuse, along with his brother, (that was at the lower end of the scale of sexual abuse,) but which 35+ years later, was triggered by the testimonies of two individuals, which resulted four years later in a NHS referral to PTSD group sessions in 2019, and individual therapy sessions in 2020/21.
I don't know about you, but I'm not buying it...
"The sex abuse left me with PTSD and dissociation."
Sexual abuse left me with scars I will carry for life. Its left my sister a heroin addict and a street sleeper/drinker. My nieces are both drug addicts, and one is in a mental institution for stabbing a man, after hearing voices in her head. My mother died because she couldn't get enough of her medicine, (which society deems illegal), to stay alive and relieve her medical symptoms.
I understand better than anyone how childhood sexual abuse ruins lives, because it has ruined my life and the lives of my mother, sister, nieces and friends.
I suffer from PTSD and dissociation having been continually harassed and arrested by Sussex Police since 2015.
I've lost count of how many times I've been arrested and how many hours I've languished in a police cell.
Sourced from Guerrilla Democracy News - List of arrests in the last 4 years.
1. Arrested for stalking and harassing [REDACTED] - No criminal charges brought 2. Arrested for making a malicious video, stalking and harassing [REDACTED] - No criminal charges brought 3. Arrested for making and possessing child porn - charged but later dropped due to lack of evidence 4. Arrested for contempt of court - Accepted 4 months suspended sentence for 2 years, of which he served without incident 5. Arrested for stalking/harassing [REDACTED] on the eve of the Covid Lockdown, (causing maximum damage, who if it happened to anyone else most probably have committed suicide.) - Charges and Stalking Prevention Order (SPO) brought, but later dropped due to lack of evidence.6. Arrested for breaking SPO by not recording his address 3 days after the order was given- Charged, case dismissed 7. Arrested for breaking SPO because Andy Devine said the initials [REDACTED] in conversation. Charged, case dismissed 8. Arrested for naming [REDACTED] in an article, who's blurb couldn't be read with the naked eye - Charged, case dismissed 9. Arrested for allegedly taking three boys into the woods to have sex with, after showing them videos of beheadings. Bailed extended from 19 Jan to 04 Apr 2021
I've been left with PTSD having been arrested on Sunday 22 March 2020, on the eve of the Covid-19 lockdown, in 5am raid, when all my communication equipment was taken, laptops, phones, iMac, ipad, Play Station and internet box, leaving me totally disconnected and dissociated from society for the lock-down's duration.
I cannot even begin to tell you how PTSD has effected my life. But I will put it all down into words in due course, but luckily James Hind does a better job than me, by putting into words exactly how I feel, after a panic attack whenever I hear a vehicle pass my house, or a car door open.
"The dissociation is lifelong, and is a natural reaction by the body in extreme trauma situations where the body prepares for death by shutting down pain and emotion; dissociation is my default response to stress."
I totally get it, and sympathize with anyone suffering from PTSD, be it from fighting in war, suffering child sexual abuse, or being mercilessly gang stalked by a satanic sex cult, aided and abetted by the Police.
"In 2021, when making another complaint to the police about Jeanette Archer, I accidently triggered another child abuse investigation when I mentioned in the complaint that I had been physically abused by a family member, and was triggered by a video that Archer had posted showing the physical abuse of a child. I did not want to proceed with that second child abuse investigation."
No comment!
"In the aftermath of my complaint to the police over sexual abuse, I was haunted by questions: why was I abused? what did I do wrong? why did the person abuse me?
Now this is very interesting and very revealing! He wants us to believe that between 35-40 years after the low scale sexual abuse he suffered aged 6, he was triggered by the testimony of two individuals, which went onto leave him "haunted" with questions.
According to the time scale given, Hind first reported child abuse to the police in 2018, and again in 2021, after group and individual therapy sessions, where you thought these questions would have been answered.
Why was I abused? What did I do wrong? Why did the person abuse me?
To supplement group and individual therapy sessions, he felt it prudent and necessary to go above and beyond, and pretend to be a 12 year old boy in a notorious paedophile/teen online chat-room.
As a victim of child abuse myself, I wouldn't need either group or individual therapy to answer these questions.
Why was I abused? You were abused because you were the easy option, and weakest link.
What did I do wrong? You did nothing wrong, you are the victim and its not your fault you were abused. The fault lies 100% with the abuser and NOT the abused.
Why did the person abuse me? They abused you because it turned them on, and their own sexual satisfaction, meant more to them than ownership of your own body, virginity, dignity, freedom and choice.
"These questions resulted in a period of intense research into scientific studies on paedophiles, media interviews with paedophiles, paedophile stings, crime reports; anything that would answer these questions."
Now we have Hind elaborating, or rather, embellishing his story.
Let's recap:
1. Abused aged six, alongside his younger brother. Described as low level on the scale of sexual abuse.
2. Was triggered in 2014 by the testimony of two individuals.
3. Submitted report to police about his own child abuse in 2018.
4. 2018 (or sooner) Went undercover as a 12 year old boy in a notorious paedophile/pre-teen/teen online chat-room.
5. Group therapy sessions in 2019 and individual therapy sessions in 2020 and 2021.
6. 2021, started a period of intense research into scientific studies on paedophiles, media interviews with paedophiles, paedophile stings, crime reports.
7. In 2021 was triggered when reporting Jeanette Archer to police, that he was physically abused by a family member, but choose not to pursue the complaint with police.
"Anything that would answer these questions."
"During this period, an opportunity came up where I could serve on the moderator/admin team of a social media site."
Interesting he used the words "opportunity," and "serve." "Opportunity" because it means he had been looking forward to becoming the site's moderator/admin), and "serve," because it implies he is doing something for the 'Greater Good', and that he is contributing to a 'Worthy Cause,' to which he is happy to sacrifice his time and attention, without expecting any monetary reward.
If he wasn't getting a monetary reward, he would have been getting a reward of some kind, to keep him coming back for more!
"Armed with the tools of a moderator, that included the ability to delete content, and suspend people, I dealt with users and content that included spammers, racists, hackers, flamers, trolls, and paedophiles."
Wow, this is very revealing too! He mentions "a social media site," which to me means Facebook. I agree it could also apply to Instagram, Twitter and YouTube, but Facebook is the most likely social media platform who allow moderator and admin teams.
Whatever social media platform he had the "opportunity," (again, an interesting choice of word, because it means he had been looking forward to becoming it,) to delete content and suspend people on, he admits that he dealt with paedophiles.
It takes one to know one, (or as Hind himself describes it, "horses running together.") Hind would be better placed than anyone to know a paedophile, seeing as he's been hanging out with them online, pretending to be a 12 year old boy since 2018, and no doubt long before too.
"Part of my role was to identify and remove paedophiles from the site; which was where a team of two moderators worked together, one as a “child”, the other to deal with any paedophile that was discovered and communicated to them by the “child”."
Now was he doing this to fight the paedophiles, (which he evidently didn't do, when he failed to report the paedo/groomer from Kent in 2018), or was he doing it to answer the three questions, which in all honesty should have been answered in 2019, during his group therapy sessions.
He says that part of his "role was to identify and remove paedophiles from the site."
Which begs the question, what type of social media site are we talking about? By the way Hind talks about having to identity and remove paedophiles from the site, to me, implies its a children friendly social media site?
Why else would there be a role to identity and remove paedophiles from a social media site, other than for the reason that children visit and use the said social media site in question?
Which then begs the question, why is a 35-40 year old man, moderating for a pre-teen/teen social media site?
Hind saw it as an "opportunity," to moderate and "serve" as part of the admin team, of this certain social media site, which catered for pre-teen/teenagers, because otherwise, why else would there be a need for two moderators (one to play a decoy child) to identify and remove paedophiles?
Why hasn't Hind named the said social media site, when in 2018 he was inviting readers of the Hoaxtead Research community to contact him via his Twitter account, so that he could send them the link?
Which in my eyes is distributing paedophile friendly information.
"During my early months as a moderator it was frustrating with the lack of tools and freedom to do our job against a heavy workload."
What more "tools and freedom" did Hind need to do this job, against what the reader can only assume is a "heavy workload," of having to "identify and remove paedophiles", from a certain "social media site", that he was fortunate to have the "opportunity," to "serve" in his "role" as "moderator."
Can no-one else see the satanic twist of play, staring the reader straight in the face? He is the paedophile hiding in plain sight, pretended to the the anti-paedophile hero, here to save the world from paedophiles!
Is anyone really buying this bullshit?
"It was during this time that I posted comments to Hoaxtead about my experiences with paedophiles on that site, but due to fears of Satan Hunters being a nuisance I did not say I was a moderator or identify the site."
"but due to fears of Satan Hunters being a nuisance I did not say I was a moderator or identify the site," what the fuck does that mean?
Have no fear, Hind is here, but just don't tell the Satan Hunters!!! This man is loony. While he says he did not reveal he was "a moderator or identify the site", he was more than willing to pass on the site's address to the Hoaxtead Research readership. And what does it matter whether Hind tells us now in 2021, what he didn't tell his audience in 2018?
It is an irrelevant piece of information, that he felt he had to drop into the narrative, because he knows his story doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
"It is these Hoaxtead comments that Matt Taylor has jumped upon to make more false allegations against me."
I haven't made any "false allegations" against anyone, let alone James Hind or anyone else. If anyone has been making false allegations, it's James Hind, by saying I am a "three times convicted stalker", that there are "three police complaints against me", that I am "a predator", "a danger to women and children", and the ridiculous suggestion that I'm "a Satan Hunter".
Which is particularly offense to me because I've always treated Santa like a father, and Santa has always treated me like his favourite son...
"In the weeks after my comments on Hoaxtead, the site improved rapidly: we had a new team leader; we gained more powers; had more liberty to make decisions; the moderator team was increased in number; the rules added and improved."
Whoopee, the pre-teen/teen social media site is saved, by the heroic endeavors of the heavy workload of identifying and removing paedophiles, to make a safe online space for pre-teens and teenagers to chat and exchange pictures and videos, free from the prey of the dirty nonces, who prowl the internet looking for vulnerable children to exploit.
"I served for nearly two years until my studies, work and other real life factors meant I no longer had the time to continue, and I retired as moderator."
Do you think the admin team gave him a farewell party. A little something for all the hard work he put in, identifying and removing paedophiles from a social media site, geared for pre-teen and teenagers?
"As a moderator I was good at what I did, and no doubt through my efforts of kicking scores of predators from the site, some users did not suffer abuse at their hands."
Does he mean, he was good at being the child decoy? Yes surely. They worked a two man moderator/admin team, where one acted as the child. We know as a fact, because Hind told us.
He boasts and takes credit for, (through his own "effort," he hastens to add,) that he "kicked scores of predators from the site."
"Some users did not suffer abuse at their hands," tells us equally, that some did.
It also makes you wonder why Hind saw it as an "opportunity" to moderate and "serve" on this particular pre-teen/teen social media site, and how thrilled he was when "the site improved rapidly", as he said it,"we had a new team leader; we gained more powers; had more liberty to make decisions; the moderator team was increased in number; the rules added and improved."
It makes sense he "kicked off scores of predators," leaving the playground free for himself.
"As a moderator I had to abide by the protocols of the site, which had its own processes for dealing with law enforcement."
According to Hind himself the police were all over the chat-room, and were only there to collect the evidence they needed to make arrests and secure convictions.
"The site works closely with law enforcement, and will hand over information on users on request. "
But James Hind failed to pass on information about a Kent paedo/groomer to the police, when he had the "opportunity," to do so. And it is this which lays at the centre of this scandal which Hind now finds himself at the centre of.
Notice how he says he "could have ended in their life being ruined", but it is not in his "nature to be the cause of the ruin of the lives of others."
Which means he is happy to ruin the lives of innocent women by reporting them to the police for child-abuse at the most lesser of extremes (namely saying a name,) where as Hind fails to report dangerous paedophiles who ruin children's lives, while purporting to be an anti-paedophile crusader!
"Unlike the hunters, I don't like that on my mind," proves his loyalty, compassion and mercy towards paedophiles.
"I learned a lot about paedophiles: their strategies; character; and the harm they cause."
In 2018 James Hind wanted us to believe he went undercover as a 12 year old boy, in a notorious paedo/teen online chat-room because he wanted to, quote:
“For personal and business reasons I want to learn more about the paedophiles, their process of grooming in chatrooms, the impact they have on their victims, what the police and paedophile hunters are doing, and what the children feel, experience, think and act with regards to these paedophiles.”
In 2021, when held to account for saying what he said in 2018, Hind's reason for pretending to be a 12 year old boy in a notorious paedo/teen online chatroom changed to, quote:
"I was haunted by questions: why was I abused? what did I do wrong? why did the person abuse me?"
His story has changed since 2018.
"I learned a lot about the challenges of sites in dealing with paedophiles."
I bet he learned a lot, but did he answer those fundamental questions, that really should have been answered in group therapy sessions in 2019.
"Matt Taylor has an obsession with throwing around accusations of paedophilia at people."
I wouldn't describe it as "an obsession," but yes I do have a history of "throwing around accusations of paedophilia at people."
Read more:
Is Prince Charles a paedophile?
Russell Brand Exposed as a paedophile!
Was Colonel Gaddafi a paedophile too?
I've called Fanny Bones one, and even named Queen Elizabeth II as being part of an international paedophile ring. Click here to watch a short Bitchute promotional video.
We've all been called a paedophile by at least a dozen people, at least a dozen times a day on the internet.
James Hind likes to call me a "Satan Hunter," "a predator," "a danger to women and children" , I can go on and on, but its boring now!
"Taylor was one of the horde of Satan Hunters who relentlessly pursued the children and families of [CENSORED] with false allegations of SRA; activity that earned him a court conviction."
Bullshit and more lies from Hind that sums up my problem with him and his supporters.
I have never spread any "false allegations of SRA", and my "court conviction" is my business which I am forbidden to talk about due to Court Order A20200067.
With all the bravado of reporting innocent women to the police for what he believes is a "form of child-abuse," Hind is activity in contempt of a Court Order preventing anything to be said online about my conviction.
How ironic!
"Taylor was investigated for possession of indecent images; he most recently says he is under police investigation over activities with boys in a wood."
Where as I have been 100% transparent with my case, and have published all the documents and supporting evidence, Hind has yet to address the heart of the scandal which he is at the centre of, that he failed to report a paedo/groomer from Kent to the police, while today reports Sharon Gale and others for saying a name on YouTube, to a minimal audience, who would do nothing else with the information, but forget about it.
"Taylor is subject to at least three police complaints against himself, and is very much at risk of having his suspended prison sentence activated if he is convicted in relation to these police complaints."
Three people may have indeed made a complaint against me, but it doesn't mean those complaints are being investigated.
I am at zero risk of having my "suspended prison sentence activated", and the fact that he was put this information into the public domain, now means James Hind has broken Court Order A20200067, and now finds himself in contempt of court.
Be rest assured, I will notify the Police, Lewes Courts and the Attorney General.
The court order restrictions placed against my trial is NOT for my benefit, but for benefit of the children, of whom danger, James Hind has now put them into.
"Matt Taylor is in no position to be throwing stones at people considering his history."
I beg your pardon James Hind; I am perfectly positioned to be throwing stones, because I'm picking up the stones you've thrown at me, and throwing them back at you.
"Paedophiles like the ones I kicked out of that site, and Satan Hunters such as Matt Taylor, are horses that often run together; they share the same traits such as aggression, lack of empathy and obsession; and they keep coming back to prey on innocent people."
I wish James Hind stops talking about himself, superimposing himself onto others.
He says he "kicked paedophiles off the site", when the evidence suggests he actively protected the paedophiles he identified on the site.
He told us he wanted to learn more about being a paedophile. He is right, paedophiles "are horses that often run together."
James Hind has shown aggression to many many people, as with a lock of empathy and an obsession bordering on fanatical. It's all projection. Hind comes back to prey on innocent people, while protecting the guilty.
"If there is anything I learnt from fighting paedophiles and Satan Hunters, the answer to curbing them is through tools such as artificial intelligence, which can act in the background and identify these predators, stopping them in their tracks before they do damage to the innocent."
Yeah yeah yeah; James Hind's Ai project, has got just as much a chance to see reality as the construction of a new £200 million King Arthur II Film/TV Studios in Brighton! (Which to be fair, has good odds of succeeding!)
The only reason he wants to develop an Ai product is for "sinister purposes", and nothing to do with the welfare and "wellbeing of children", as he himself accuses of others.
Remember, its all Projection.
"This is the road I am interested in, by using the experiences I learned from encounters with paedophiles and Satan Hunters, and turning that into viable information technology products, that will permanently curb the activities of paedophiles and Satan Hunters on the internet."
I don't know about you, but Hind's parting remark that he is "interested" in "permanently curbing the activities of paedophiles and Satan Hunters on the internet", sounds very hollow and very creepy.
He hasn't convinced me of anything, and failed to address the central issue of the scandal he finds himself in, namely that he protected a paedo/groomer from Kent, all the while pertaining to be a paedophile hunter, grassing up innocent women for breaking court orders, while he's broken Court Order A20200067.
James Hind is a paedophile hiding in plain sight, and I believe I have successfully proved that, using his own words against him.
Stayed tuned to Shellie May's Statement Analysis coming soon....
FURTHER READING
Read how it all started: Is James Hind a paedophile?
I will keep a close eye on Matt Taylor vows James Hind
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)