The 'E-mail' which forced Andrea Leadsom out of the Conservative Leadership.

Running scared having read Brian Setchfield's email

MRS ANDREA LEADSOM

HOUSE OF COMMONS,

LONDON,

SW1A OAA.

Dear Mrs Leadsom.

My name is Mr Setchfield and I have some very serious and alarming matters that I wish to reveal to you in relation to the RT HON Theresa May.

I have with the assistance of my team for a considerable amount of time now, repeatedly reported the most serious criminality to Mrs May and to her PA, Ms Jenny Sharkey, but, unfortunately, it has been met with the proverbial wall of silence, which as I am sure you will appreciate is most concerning to us, bearing in mind of course, the very serious nature of the matters that we have constantly placed before the RT HON Lady.

It is further the case, that we had again contacted Mrs May on Wednesday 29^th June 2016, at 17.14pm, which was of course before she had announced that she intended to be considered for the role of the position of being elected as the Prime Minister of the UK.

We have listed below for your convenience the very email letter that we had sent to the RT HON Theresa May and to all of the recipients copied into that email. Furthermore, the email below has also a revealing timeline of the events which had also been sent previously by us to Mrs May. We do believe you will find the information below self explanatory.

We do most sincerely trust that this email letter to you and that of its contents, will alert you to the fact, that it will of course naturally now be impossible for the RT HON Mrs Theresa May to continue to be in the running for the position of the Prime Ministers position, and, quite clearly, that once this matter has been exposed and revealed publicly by you as a trusted member of the Conservative Party, it will of course leave the clear pathway for you to be elected as the new Prime Minister of the UK, where the general public will be looking to you to negotiate the timely departure of the UK from the European Parliament. 

Finally, we would ask if you would please be kind enough to reply to us by return so as to bring about some kind of formal investigation into all of the very serious criminality that has taken place at the hands of the most vile “ORGANISED GANG OF CRIMINALS” that the Uk has ever had the displeasure of having to endure, thank you.

Yours sincerely

Team Setchfield.

(EMAIL TO THE RT HON THERESA MAY OF WEDNESDAY 29^TH JUNE 2016, AT 17.14PM)

To: mayt@parliament.uk  Cc: sharkeyj@parliament.uk ; corbynj@parliament.uk; sadiqkhanmp@parliament.uk; public.enquires@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; vazk@parliament.uk ; tom.watson.mp@parliament.uk ; tim.loughton.mp@parliament.uk; matttaylor2000@hotmail.com; reefboy60@hotmail.com  ; andrewpeacher2013@gmail.com; fieldmcc@yahoo.com; Peter Eyre <petereyreoz@yahoo.com>; sabine@globalnet.co.uk; Foxfield Management

THE RT HON THERESA MAY.

Dear Mrs May.

My name is Mr Setchfield and you will of course recall, that myself and my team had repeatedly reported serious “Fraud and Deception” to you and to your PA, Ms Jenny Sharkey, that is to say, with reference to the serious amounts of money that has been stolen from the “British Treasury” and, that the theft had been carried out by an “ORGANISED GNG OF CRIMINALS”. I have for your convenience listed below the email that we had sent to you on Wednesday 28^th October 2015, at 16.60pm.

Mrs May, I have to say that it was very disappointing to not have received any kind of acknowledgement form you and Jenny as we had truly expected you to have dealt with the matter as a matter of urgency.

I now feel that I should reiterate the very serious matter to you once again, because, to date the theft of the serious amounts of money that has been stolen, remains stolen. I also feel that I must further reiterate to you that the possible murder of a member of the Public at the hands of Police Sergeant Matthew Presland, Police No (CP 806) also still remains dormant.

I would ask if you would please be kind enough to reply to us by return as a matter of urgency, and, of course naturally, before you consider your own position to stand for the Prime Ministers position.

We look forward to hearing from you, thank you.

Yours sincerely

Mr Setchfield.

READ MORE: CRITICAL REDLINE ALERT BY TEAM SETCHFIELD
http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/critical-redline-alert.html

“CRITICAL REDLINE ALERT”

FACT (1)

TEAM SETCHFIELD SENT EMAIL TO THE CONSERVATIVE MP MRS ANDREA LEADSOM TODAY, MONDAY 11^THJULY 2016, AT 10.25AM. THE EMAIL WAS WITH THE SUBJECT HEADING “FRAUD AND DECEPTION” AND HIGHLIGHTING THE PROVERBIAL WALL OF SILENCE RECEIVED FROM, AND, WITH REFERENCE TO THE RT HON MRS THERESA MAY, AND, HER PA MS JENNY SHARKEY. 

FACT (2)

IT WAS REPORTED THAT MRS ANDREA LEADSOM STOOD HERSELF DOWN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT AND IN BLIND PANIC FROM RUNNING AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE POSITION OF THE UK’S NEW PRIME MINISTER WITHIN (1) HOUR OF RECEIVEING THE EMAIL FROM TEAM SETCHFIELD.

FACT (3)

IT IS NOW THE CASE THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY ARE NOW IN SERIOUS ROUND TABLE DISSCUSSIONS IN THE CABINET AT DOWNING STREET, WITH THE PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE ANDREA LEADSOM/TEAM SETCHFIELD EXPOSURE. 

FACT (4)

IT IS THE CASE, THAT AFTER THE ANDY PEACHER RADIO SHOW OF THURSDAY 7^TH JULY 2016, AT 19.00PM, IN WHICH, MR SETCHFIELD REVEALED TO THE LISENING AUDIENCE ON AIR THE REAL TRUE FACTS WITH REFERENCE TO MANY OF THE WORLDS PROBLEMS, IT HAS NOW COME TO LIGHT, THAT BECAUSE OF THE REVELATIONS REVEALED BY MR SETCHFIELD DURING THAT PARTICULAR RADIO SHOW, IT IS MORE THAN CLEAR THAT IT HAS CAUSED SERIOUS CONCERN TO THE UK PARLIAMENT AND EMBROILED THEM INTO A POSITION OF STALEMATE, WHICH WAS THEN FOLLOWED UP BY THE MOST SERIOUS EMAIL SENT TO MRS ANDREA LEADSOM WITH REFERENCE TO THE MOST SERIOUS CRIMINALITY THAT HAS EVER BEEN EXPOSED IN THE UK AND CRIMINALILITY THAT WAS ADMINISTERED AND THEN CARRIED OUT BY THE MOST VULGAR AND VILE “ORGANISED GANG OF CRIMINALS.

FACT (5)

WE FEEL IT IS IMPERATIVE TO ADVISE THE POWERS TO BE IN ABSOLUTELY NO UNCERTAIN TERMS WHATSOEVER, THAT MR SETCHFIELD IS NOW READY AND IN A POSITION TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE WITH HIS TEAM, TO RENEGOTIATE OUR SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH THESE PEOPLE, IN ORDER TO SET THE PATH FOR A FAIRER SYSTEM FOR THE CITIZENS AND TO BRING ABOUT TRUE VALUE, PURPOSE, FREEDOM AND OF COURSE, WELL-BEING FOR EVERYONE.

YOURS SINCERELY

TEAM SETCHFIELD. 

"CRITICAL REDLINE ALERT" "FRAUD AND DECEPTION".‏

From:	Foxfield Management (foxfield.management@talktalk.net)
Sent:	11 July 2016 20:12:58
To:	laura.kuenssberg@bbc.co.uk (laura.kuenssberg@bbc.co.uk)

Ms Laura Kuenssberg

BBC London.

Dear Laura.

We have been watching with much interest the sudden departure of Mrs Andrea Leadsom from the leadership race to be the PM of the UK.

We have to say that the announcement that she had made earlier today that she was standing aside, was as predicted by our team prior to her running away from the leadership contest. We did however note, that as she had finished her speech that you jumped straight in and asked the most vital but obvious question of her, which was, why are you really standing down, which was met with silence and absolutely no response whatsoever.

Laura, we can answer the vital but obvious question for you and all at the BBC, it is because we had sent an email to Mrs Andrea Leadsom at 10.25am of todays date, which was within (1) hour of her stepping aside. It is the case quite clearly, that had she stood her ground and remained strong to reveal the truth and the real reason of what had brought about the most damaging set-of circumstances that had been presented to her within our very important and serious email, then the most horrendous situation would have arisen where the RT HON Theresa May would have had no other option other than to have conceded the contest and stood herself down with immediate effect and in disgrace.

We have for your convenience and for the convenience of the BBC, and, also for the very convenience of every single citizen within the Uk, listed below the very email that had brought about the most sudden departure of Mrs Leadsom. The email listed below also contains the email timeline of events that the RT HON Theresa May is more than fully aware of, and, the very serious and dangerous set-of circumstances that have been repeatedly reported to Mrs May by Mr Setchfield and Team Setchfield.

We would ask if you would please be kind enough to acknowledge receipt of this email by return, and, to also advise us on what you feel is needed to open up the entire matter that the entire Conservative Government has allowed themselves to become embroiled in.

We look forward to hearing from you, thank you.

Yours sincerely

Team Setchfield.

The Downfall of New Labour

The Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) have sent out the message loud and clear, 'Parliament is no place for good and decent men or women.'

Jeremy Corbyn

I'm watching from the back back back benches in total shock and horror, as the Labour Party slaughter their leader for no other reason than being a good and decent man.

Call me naïve if you wish, perhaps I am; but I was always under the impression that the opposition party were in opposition to oppose the policies and ideals of the governing party.

Oh how wrong am I?

I used to joke that they are all in it together; both the Conservatives and Labour. Oh how right am I?

According to 'They Work For You' website, Angela Eagle; Jeremy Corbyn's rival for the Labour leadership voted for:

·  a stricter asylum system
·  university tuition fees increasing from £1125 per year to up to £3000 per year
·  the introduction of ID cards
·  90 days without charge
·  for the invasion of Iraq
·  against an investigation into the Iraq war
·  the retention of Trident nuclear weapons
·  air strikes on Islamic State in Iraq
·  air strikes on Islamic State in Syria 

I expect this voting record would mirror that of Hilary Benn too.

What is the use of having an opposition when their voting record matches that of their opposition?

This is the beauty of Jeremy Corbyn and the reason why 60% of grass-root Labour members voted for him. They voted for him because he walks the walk and talks the talks. He votes against the Nasty Nazi Conservative Government and does so consistently.

I find it incredible that the bully boys and girls of the PLP aren't letting him fight a general election. 

The evidence suggests that he'll win with a landslide.

I've personally voted for every political party (except the Liberal Democrats), during my 27 years of voting eligibility. I got so disillusioned with politicians breaking their promises, that I ran as an independent candidate in the Brighton Kemptown 2015 General Election, in which I came last with 69 votes! (This taught me a lesson, that honest men have no place in Parliament,) but even I'll vote Labour under Jeremy Corbyn, and I'm your Average Joe with the same mind-set as a million other Average Joe's in Great Britain.

The Travesty of Democracy

http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/the-argus-travesty-of-democracy.html

We are being taken for a ride, and the 172 Labour MP's who voted against Jeremy Corbyn in his vote of confidence are the culprits.

"For heaven's sake man, go!"

Watching the venom of David Cameron looking Jeremy Corbyn in the eye, and hollering at him from across the Common's dispatch box, to "for heaven's sake man, go;" gives the impression that its David Cameron leading the revolt and the Labour party following his lead.

My golden rule when it comes to politics is to say 'no' when a politician tells us to say 'yes'; that its 'bad' if a politician tells us its 'good', and to 'go' when a politician tells us to 'stay'.

It was for this reason that I didn't vote in the EU referendum. One nasty arse-hole telling me to 'stay' and another telling me to 'go'. Fuck that for a game of dominoes.

It’s with this in mind that when David Cameron says its "in my party's interest for him to sit there, it's not in the national interest," what he actually means is that "it's in the national interest for Jeremy Corbyn to be the leader of the Labour party because he'll win the next general election with a landslide and that it's in his party's interest that he goes."

 These politicians really are the lowest of the low; dirty rotten liars and back stabbers, paedophiles, fraudsters and murderers.

All this will come out.... It’s already common knowledge in the Truth Movement and once the news breaks on mainstream news there will be a revolution within 24 hours.

As I've already said, call me naïve, but I thought Jeremy Corbyn was a cunning plan by minions of Queen Elizabeth II to appease the British public and throw them a crumb to perpetuate the myth that democracy is alive and kicking in the United Kingdom.

After-all he appears to have done nothing about the child-abuse scandal in his North Islington constituency.

Jeremy Corbyn turns a blind eye to child-abuse

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3181783/Did-Jeremy-Corbyn-try-protect-fellow-Left-wingers-implicated-paedophile-scandal.html

David Cameron

I'm changing my mind now. Perhaps Jeremy Corbyn is the real deal; a good and decent man who slipped through the net of Parliamentary vice, perversion and immorality?

Either way, (and for what it’s worth), I wish Jeremy Corbyn stays the course and out-flanks his rebel MP's.

If you want to vote for austerity, join the nasty party. If you want to renew the Trident missile system, join the nasty party, if you want to perpetuate war, poverty and child-abuse; you know what to do - (All together now---) Join the Nasty Nazis Conservative party.

There is always a silver lining in everything and the silver lining in the Jeremy Corbyn rebellion story, is that the nasty conservatives masquerading as Labour MP's have been exposed.

We have all known that the Labour party has been infiltrated by the nasty Tories since Tony Blair came to power. That's why the Labour party was called New Labour.

Thankfully the downfall of the New Labour Party is in progress and out of the fallen bricks and mortar will rise the Old Labour. Proper opposition with proper values and principles.

Proper Labour, not this wishy washy bullshit; men with girl names, stabbing their bosses in the back...

The Rt Hon Theresa May

Dear Mrs May.

Theresa May

My name is Mr Setchfield and you will of course recall, that myself and my team had repeatedly reported serious “Fraud and Deception” to you and to your PA, Ms Jenny Sharkey, that is to say, with reference to the serious amounts of money that has been stolen from the “British Treasury” and, that the theft had been carried out by an “ORGANISED GNG OF CRIMINALS”. I have for your convenience listed below the email that we had sent to you on Wednesday 28th October 2015, at 16.60pm.

Mrs May, I have to say that it was very disappointing to not have received any kind of acknowledgement from you and Jenny as we had truly expected you to have dealt with the matter as a matter of urgency.

I now feel that I should reiterate the very serious matter to you once again, because, to date the theft of the serious amounts of money that has been stolen, remains stolen. I also feel that I must further reiterate to you that the possible murder of a member of the Public at the hands of Police Sergeant Matthew Presland, Police No (CP 806) also still remains dormant.

I would ask if you would please be kind enough to reply to us by return as a matter of urgency, and, of course naturally, before you consider your own position to stand for the Prime Ministers position.

We look forward to hearing from you, thank you.

Yours sincerely

Mr Setchfield.

_________________________________________________________

(EMAIL OF WEDNESDAY 28TH OCTOBER 2015, AT 16.50PM)

----- Original Message -----

From: Foxfield Management

To: mayt@parliament.uk

Cc: public.enquires@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk ; corbynj@parliament.uk ; StandardsCommissioner@parliament.uk ; vazk@parliament.uk ;sadiqkhanmp@parliament.uk ; tim.loughton.mp@parliament.uk ; tom.watson.mp@parliament.uk ; sharkeyj@parliament.uk ;mayt@parliament.uk

Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 4:50 PM

Subject: Fraud and Deception.

RT HON THERESA MAY

FAO JENNY SHARKEY

PA TO THERESA MAY. 

DEAR JENNY.

We request an update from Mrs Theresa May with reference to the very serious fraud that we have repeatedly reported to her through you. As you will recall, we did send through to you repeated emails with reference to all of the Government money that has been stolen by an "ORGANISED GANG OF CRIMINALS" but, to date, apart from an acknowledgement of receipt, we have had absolutely no response or reply from Mrs May or yourself with reference to this very serious ongoing fraud.

The emails that we had sent to you with reference to the very serious theft of the Government money that has been stolen, are dated below in timeline order.

(1) 3rd June 2014 at 09.44am.

(2) 9th June 2014 at 07.45am.

(3) 10th June 2014 at 09.42am.

(4( 18th June 2014 at 10.19am.

(5) 19th June 2014 at 16.59pm.

(6) 23rd June 2014 at 11.29am.

(7) 30th June 2014 at 15.47pm.

(8) 7th July 2014 at 07.26am.

(9) 16th July 2014 at 07.57am.

(10) You will of course also recall that there were also many telephone conversations that had taken place between us and Ms Jenny Sharkey, who is of course your PA, all of which have been logged.

We would ask respectfully for a reply by return please, bearing in mind of course, the enormous amounts of Government money that has been stolen by this vile "ORGANISED GANG OF CRIMINALS".

Yours sincerely

Team Setchfield.

Matt Taylor's Political Column - Thursday 26th May 2016

Is David Cameron a Necrophile?

Brexit: to Stay or Go?

As far as I'm concerned its all academic whether we stay in the EU or not.

Having taken a keen interest in politics since 1997, and being a wide awake member of the Alternative View/Truth Movement, I've come to look upon this "life changing" referendum in a different light, than the average Joe in the street.

We're doomed if we do and doomed if we don't.

I live by a simple rule when it comes to politics. Whatever politicians say is good, I know its bad. Whatever they say we should do, we shouldn't and whatever they say is bad, I know is good.

Alas, the catch 22 of the EU Referendum is that we have politicians telling us to do one of two things. Either way I don't trust them.

David Cameron is telling us to stay and Boris Johnson is telling us to go. Its with this in mind that I've come to the conclusion that whether we stay or go, its all academic.

Its a set piece of political theatre.

Without knowing the bigger picture, I reckon the hidden powers behind the curtains are using this referendum for a more nefarious purpose than what we are being led to believe.

We must always remember that nothing done by the politicians is done for the benefit of Mankind. Everything is done to promote their own interests and not the interests of the average man or woman in the street.

This EU referendum is nothing more than political theatre designed to set us up for the next big set play.

I imagine that with a looming financial collapse on the horizon, the powers that be are using this EU referendum to placate a hostile population in the event that their bank balances are wiped clean.

I imagine David Cameron is secretly working to get the country to vote out, while publicly campaigning to stay in. He knows his time is up and the referendum is the perfect excuse to manufacture his exit.

Ultimately its going to be a win-win for the politicians.

If the country votes to stay in, the financial collapse comes and can be blamed on the European Union. The solution will come from the European Union and the British Politicians can claim their hands are clean of blame because the collapse was yet another world-wide event, of which they had no control or involvement in.

If the country votes to leave, then when the financial collapse hits, they can assure the people that all is well because due to the separation from the European Union, Britain is perfectly placed to try something new and introduce a brand new monetary system that takes cash out of the equation and brings in a monetary system based on the chip you've implanted into you rear end.

Either way the politicians win.

The referendum will reaffirm the population's faith in democracy. People will think that they do have a choice. People will be thankful for whatever decision is made and will believe that the status quo is fantastic and that any ideas of a British style revolution or up-rising simply isn't desired or required.

We are doomed if we stay or go.

We know that David Cameron won't serve a third term (though that could be up for change). If he wins the vote he'll no doubt stay on and hand over to his best mate George Osborne in 2020.

If the country decides to leave, Dodgy Dave will graciously step aside and a Conservative leadership election may well see Boris Johnson step in as PM.

Either way we are doomed.

Britain comes out of the European Union and a bunch of privately educated Conservative psychopaths will have free rein to rewrite our Human Rights and Law books.

Out of the frying pan into the fire.

Though having said all that; what will I be doing with my 'irrelevant' vote?

Its a good question I've been asking myself...

I sincerely believe that whether I vote for in or out, a predetermined outcome has already been decided.

We all remember Ireland voting to stay out, only for them to be given another vote and told to vote in.

Now if the Queen were to give the British public a referendum as to whether cannabis should be legalized or not, then perhaps I'd have faith in the democratic system. But considering this in or out referendum is the brain child of David Cameron, and ultimately for the benefit of the Conservative party, I'd most probably give the whole thing a miss actually.

Mind you if I was to have my arm twisted to vote, I'd definitely vote out only to watch the circus of watching David Cameron be pushed out of 10 Downing Street and the pantomime of the Conservative party deciding who to put back in.

God I hate Politics...

Madeleine McCann Found Alive and Well.  

With the decision by the Home Secretary Theresa May to inject a further £95,000 of tax payers money into the search of world famous Madeleine McCann, its makes you wonder whether the script writers behind the scenes of world events, are planning to have her found alive and well...

After-all it'd be the perfect way to squash the tiresome conspiracy theorists who claim Madeleine McCann was sold off to some global paedophile ring by her parents, or that she's dead,( as Richard D Hall contends) or buried under Murat's driveway or that she died at the hands of her mother and dumped out at sea.

Mind you, number one conspiracy theorist Chris Spivey has even gone as far to suggest Madeleine McCann never even existed and is a media creation; an actress played by the same person who played the role of murdered school-girl Sarah Payne.

Having Madeleine McCann be found alive and well would be the perfect way to put all these troublesome theories to bed.

Just imagine the headlines and the worldwide euphoria!

As Chris Spivey would no doubt report if it did ever happen; all they will need to do is employ an actress to play the part. Ensure she has the custom made contact lens put in (matching her unique eye structure - which come to think about it, I've been seen on any other human being I've known) and Bob's your uncle.

Madeleine McCann Found Alive and Well.  

Gerry and Kate McCann vindicated and conspiracy theorists never believed again...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3546099/Madeleine-McCann-detectives-believe-youngster-disappeared-family-holiday-Portugal-2007-alive.html

King Arthur is Alive & Kicking

  

The Golden Cube by Matt Taylor

The Hampstead Heath Satanic Cover-up

Katy Bourne SPCC in Expense Scandal

Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films

Chris Spivey Saved by his Fan Base

Guerrilla Democracy News Part One

http://www.lulu.com/shop/matt-taylor/guerrilla-democracy-news-part-one/paperback/product-21896303.html

Guerrilla Democracy News Part Two

http://www.lulu.com/shop/matt-taylor/guerrilla-democracy-news-part-two/paperback/product-21896701.html

www.youtube.com/user/taylormotm

King Arthur is Alive and Kicking.

One day King Arthur will return in our nation's darkest hour, or so the prophecy says.

The legend of King Arthur has endured for centuries and rightly so. The reason the King Arthur legend has endured is because it’s actually true.

Unlike the fables of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Abominable Snowman, the true story of King Arthur can be found written in the annuals of the Ancient Khumry manuscripts, better known as the ancient historical manuscripts of British history.

Rediscovered by the historical detectives Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, there have actually been five King Arthur's throughout British history, of which the first two were the most famous.

King Arthur I, who lived from 355AD to 388AD fought the Romans, son of Magnus Maximus, who himself was son of Constantine the Great. The second King Arthur was born in 503AD and died in 579AD, famed for fighting the Saxons, son of King Maurice, who himself was the son of King Theoderic.

Separating fact from fiction, no sword was ever pulled from a stone and Merlin wasn't a wizard, but instead King Arthur II's mentor and teacher. Both King Arthur I and II were directly related to each other, both in a long line of Kings reaching back to the first King of Britain, King Brutus and further back to the Holy Family, descended from Anne, sister of Mary, mother of Jesus Christ himself.

Written in the Coelbren language of the ancient British, (Welsh to be exact,) Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett contend that ancient British history is the most well recorded and chronicled history in the world.

It would appear that throughout history the tales and deeds of both King Arthurs, first recounted by 12th historian Geoffrey of Monmouth, had been rolled into one.

Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films.

A growing movement of historical enthusiasts are calling for the boycotting of Guy Ritchie's new King Arthur movie set for release in 2017, criticizing it for being based on the romantic rubbish of 15th Century French writer Chretien de Troyes, and peddled on behalf of a German royal dynasty.

A growing band of patriotic Brits are claiming the real British history has been covered up since 1066, by a succession of foreign royal dynasties.

Read more: Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films.
Read more: The King Arthur II Movie 'Voom' Pitch.

Richard Branson 'Vooms' to the rescue.

Just as there were two versions of the Robin Hood movies released at the same time, the 'Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Movie's community' have turned to Richard Branson's £1 Billion 'Voom' initiative to finance a new King Arthur II movie to rival Guy Ritchie's. With a budget of two million, movie producers hope to convince Richard Branson to invest his money in three blockbuster movies which tell the real story of King Arthur II, and what really happened during the Dark Ages.

From King Arthur II's birth in Wales, to his epic battles against the Picts and Saxons, which unified Britain, to his Summer Games, to the catastrophic asteroid debris which hit Britain in 562AD, to King Arthur II's escape to America in 575AD which a fleet of 700 ships, to his tragic assassination by a Red Indian in 579AD, its sure to be a fantastic trio of films which will rewrite history forever.

Has Chris Spivey gone Totally Mad?

Christ Spivey aka Anna Prentice

The question on everyone's lips is whether or not Chris Spivey has gone totally mad?

Regarded as the Truth Movement's most influential writer, with a readership in its millions, Chris Spivey is well known for writing explosive and original articles blowing the lid on the nation's most evil and despicable people.

Going further down the rabbit's hole than anyone has dared to go before, Spivey's research has brought him to a conclusion which has resulted in an unprecedented level of ridicule and scorn from people who would have otherwise called themselves devoted fans.

Having promised to take down the British Royal family (on the proviso that enough people acted upon it,) Spivey's article about Princess Diana "The Night of the Living Dead," have left more people scratching their heads than marching to Buckingham Palace with their pick-axes.

The Night of the Living Dead

"All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts"

From claiming the Prime Minister's wife Sam Cameron, doubled as Elizabeth Owen, a witness to the 7/7 London Bombing, to claiming Lee Rigby didn't actually exist, and was actually a fictional creation based on three individuals, Karl Whittle, Robert Sarjeant and Chris Amos, Spivey goes further than ever before by stating that not only didn't Princess Diana die in the Paris car crash, but in fact she never ever existed and when she was seen in public, was a composition of Jill Dando, Selina Scott and others.

Its hard to keep up with the hundreds of face comparison pictures he publishes, and the statements he's made both past and present:

• Madeline McCann is Sarah Payne
• Jade's Goodie's mum – Jackie Budden was Brenda Leyland, the McCann troll who was alleged to have committed suicide.
• Jimmy Jone's wife Jane Russell is actually Sonia Poulton, a journalist on David Icke's now defunct TPV television station.
• That all the family photographs of Prince William and Princess Kate, with their son Prince George are photoshopped
• The only person to survive the Paris car crash (which didn't happen) Trevor Rees Jones is Sion Jenkins – the fella who spent time in prison for killing his foster daughter, Billie Jo Jenkins.
• Prince Phillip is Jimmy Savile
• Queen Elizabeth II is Prince Philip

Spivey would have us believe a Harry Potter style Ministry of Magic department is at work in which hundreds of people turn up to an inconspicuous building in London, and get to work following a preordained script written years in advance, sitting down at their desks spending their days writing news articles, manipulating photos and videos before cascading them out to the press to be shown on television and printed in the papers.

Summing up the frustrations of many of his loyal readers, Clem writes:

"Dear Chris

I have loved this site for ages and whilst I am aware you get things wrong from time to time, overall your heart is in the right place. The stuff you put out is very good, you are funny and insightful. Recently though, things have gone badly awry and I do worry about your mental health (this site must take its toll), or worse still that your work has been aquired to help promote an altogether sinister and silly agenda.

Chris, the facial comparison stuff leaves me cold and is at times ridiculous. More importantly it is pointless. It has no meaning. The Queen and Prince Philip do look alike, it is a common in marriage. Yes, you can join the two photos together, but what does that mean? Are you saying the images were doctored to make them look similar in the photos? Or that their images were blended to make one composite face? Or are you saying that the Queen and the Duck are actually one and the same?

Princess Diana was a real person. Yes, she may have disappeared to live another life but to suggest she was only a composite image of Sue Lawley etc is insanity and ultimately no – she is not whats-her-face Rothschild either, no matter how many photos are joined together. Diana was a descendent of the Rothschilds but she was not actually whats-her-face, they look entirely different. You appear to have crossed the border into flat-earth style theory. Are you going to say that Jimmy Hendrix is Morgan Freeman next? Or that Alex Jones is Bill Hicks?

Jimmy Savile is not the Duke of Edinburgh, nor is he Peter Sutcliffe. He was involved with them on deeply sinister levels but he is not them. I agree that photographs have all been tampered with, including ones of the Queen. I think that Prince Charles was only an inch taller than Savile but in photos Savile is always much smaller, why? What techniques did they use to doctor the images before photoshop? Savile was hugely and inexplicably involved with the royal family. Could he have somehow been related to them through blood? Or was he just the procurer and provider for them? Why don’t you do a full analysis of who Savile was and what he was connected to, especially his links to mass murder? Was he connected to The Moors Murderers or Fred West?

Please can you spell out what your theory is? Say it clearly, explain what you mean. Do you actually believe that the Duck and Savile are the same man, or that the images of them have been doctored so they look alike? I really struggle to follow the logic and it is so disappointing to have someone I like and admire going down a misleading path.

You have an amazing attention for detail and are so on the ball, but you need a fresh perspective. When I heard your interview and all your suspicions about the staff in the NHS being part of some plan to inject you with cancer or poison, my heart sank. A cannula is commonly inserted in a patient hours before they plan to use it. Yes, it is uncomfortable and yes it is questionable – but all part of normal practice. Just ask any pregnant woman or MIU patient? Coldness of staff and negligence and cruelty are endemic to the NHS and you only have to be involved with it for a very short period to find that out. Human beings are cruel and abusive in institutional circumstances. There is so much death at the hands of the NHS, so much iatrogenesis (surely that’s worth an article too?). I am sorry you were badly treated but it was just a bit of bad luck your finger got infected, nothing more.

Yes, all of history is made up to facilitate the satanic elite, yes they murder children, yes news stories are made up. Yes, all the photos in the news are photoshopped. But to what purpose? It is just too outlandish to suggest the cast is made up of a tiny group of actors playing multiple Bo Selecta roles. Crisis actors do exist. False flags are part and parcel of this bullshit. But really Chris, stop this nonsense. You are in danger of destroying the valuable contribution you have already made and we all need you fighting fit, mate!!"

While others like Johnny D get straight to the point:

"That's probably one of the most outlandish and ridiculous things I’ve ever read. I think you’re losing your grip Chris."

While yet more and more (once loyal readers like Nonny) believe Spivey has been 'got at' and is actively spreading misinformation on purpose:

"I started to wonder if his account had been hijacked, or in fact , Chris had been forced somehow to write this latest stuff."

Does this spell the end of Chris Spivey or the beginning of a whole new era of fame and fortune?

Only history will tell whether Spivey has hit on the Holy Grail of Conspiracy Theory or whether he's just gone mad, ranting uncontrollably as a madman would scrawl slogans on the padded wall of his asylum cell.

He is right in predicting his Diana article would bring down the British Royal family if believed and championed by enough people. To contend that there is a Ministry of Magic style department at work who manipulate local and world events by utilizing actors playing many parts is believable (to an extent.)

As with everything in life, the proof is in the pudding; and as of yet, Chris Spivey hasn't delivered a delicious enough pudding.

Its common knowledge that he thinks anyone who doesn't read his articles in full and who doesn't understand or believe his evidence at the first sitting, are "cunts", but perhaps this is where Spivey is failing.

As he makes clear in his latest article 'Site Update.'

"Whinging, whiny little voices popping up accusing me of losing the plot for [not] saying that The Duck & Savile are the same person and they then go on to ask a load of infantile questions, thus totally ignoring the fact that I have told you (in big thick letters) that there is a lot more to tell you (and by a lot more, I mean far too much to document in the post) on the subject… You really couldn’t make that shit up.

What is it with yous people? Why come here just to make yourself look fucking stupid? I mean why waste your time and efforts when you can do the exact same thing talking to a mirror – which would save yourself public embarrassment and me having to waste my time pointing out the fact that you are a cunt."

Let's be honest, its hard to read a Spivey article; they are lengthy, rambling and incoherent (But don't let Spivey hear me saying that.)

In essence he's asking his readership to believe the Earth is flat. He's demanding his readership believe something so profound and Earth shattering that it literally breaks a hole in the fabric of Time and Space.

Its no use him getting angry and calling us all cunts for not grasping his theory. Anyone can photoshop half a face with another and call it conclusive proof.

Here's a picture of me and Barry from Eastenders. If anyone accuses me of being the same person as Barry, they would be barking up the wrong tree.

Though to be fair; he does provide multiple examples of evidence which do call into question the official version of events. No one can deny this.

My argument is that for something so fantastic, fantastic proof needs to be presented.

But is it all a fantastic Red Herring?

Richie Allen is the latest Truth Movement celebrity to publicly complain of charlatan's within the movement smearing the truth and spreading falsehoods to fulfill their own agendas and nefarious ends.

Could Spivey be a Double Agent?

You can bet your bottom dollar that Ian R Crane is distancing himself from Spivey's latest theory. While he was the first to come to his rescue during Spivey's harassment trial, Crane has kept loudly quiet about his latest theory.

Likewise with the pin-up girl of the Truth Movement Danielle Le Verite, who wouldn't dare comment on Spivey's latest theory without first consulting her handler Thomas Sheridan.

***Its worthy of note that neither Ian R Crane or Thomas Sheridan even knew who Chris Spivey was until I told them during the AV5 conference in 2014.***

Its odds on favourite that considering Thomas Sheridan's view of anyone who believes the Earth is flat are "stupid cunts", he'll have nothing constructive to say about Spivey's latest theory either.

Keep in mind Spivey has never commented on:

• The Hampstead Kids
• The 788-790 Finchley Road fraud
• Chem-trials
• Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett's historical research on King Arthur II
• Aliens

It does make you wonder; what side is he on?

Of-course if Spivey's theory about multiple actors playing many different roles and the fact that not only didn't Princess Diana die in the Paris crash but that she never even existed; is proved to be true, then all would be forgiven and he'll be awarded the Nobel Peace prize.

The issue many have is that his research is turning the Truth Movement into a laughing stock and is making a mockery of the truth as we know it.

After all, if anyone comes searching about the Truth Movement, Spivey's name would be one of the first names which would spring up from Google.

How would anyone react to the proposition that the most famous car crash in history was in fact staged and that one of the most famous woman in history didn't even exist?

Perhaps one of Spivey's many gate-keepers could come to his rescue and present his research is a more pleasing and digestible manner?

Take Fabooka De Stait for example, a writer in his own right and someone who appears regularly on Spivey's site. Perhaps he could present Spivey's research in a new light?

Or how about John Hamer? Another writer who appears regularly of his site? Something needs to happen because as of now, Spivey is loosing his credibility with each new article published.

Which remains me of a Freedom of Information request I lodged with Sussex Police on the 22 March 2015.

Dear Sussex Police,

As part of your investigation into the Shoreham Airshow crash, have you investigated the claims made by Christopher D Spivey, published across three parts on his www.chrisspivey.org website?

The first part is linked below: http://chrisspivey.org/the-shoreham-airshow-crash-part-1/

Yours Sincerely,
Matthew Taylor

I've heard nothing back yet!