Boris Johnson named as Ex Prime Minister who had a Threesome with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

GALLOWAY DROPS POLITICAL NAPALM: “GRUSOME THREESOME” CLAIMS DRAG FORMER PM INTO SEX SCANDAL STORM.

The world of tickle tackle was set ablaze today after former MP George Galloway detonated what he called a political “truth bomb,” alleging that sealed Epstein-related material refers to a British prime minister participating in a sexual encounter “a gruesome threesome’ with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The claim was first touted by the writer behind The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Andrew Lownie, who said: "I have heard lots of talk about threesomes - including a threesome between Ghislaine and a British Prime Minister." When asked by the Daily Mail if it was a recent PM, Lownie responded: "A former Prime Minister, but it's not Winston Churchill."

READ MORE - 

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/uk-prime-minister-had-threesome-36685069

Speaking to his audience in trademark theatrical style via a video posted to YouTube, Galloway claimed a monologue, equal parts provocation and performance, dismissing various former leaders as unlikely candidates, name-checking Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak, Theresa May, Gordon Brown, and Tony Blair.

Galloway then made clear where his own suspicions lie.

“I am certain,” he told viewers, “that this gruesome threesome was completed by none other than Boris Johnson.”

Boris Johnson

The allegation was delivered without evidence, sourcing, or corroboration — and, as of publication, no document, court filing, or verified testimony has emerged linking Johnson to Epstein, Maxwell, or any such event.

Sex Addict?

Johnson has previously denied any improper connection to Epstein, and no law enforcement body in the UK or US has accused him of wrongdoing.

Still, the comments have ignited fierce debate online, with critics accusing Galloway of reckless defamation, while supporters frame the remarks as “asking questions” about elite power networks and historical proximity to Epstein.

Legal experts would note that repeating unproven allegations about identifiable individuals carries significant risk, particularly when framed as fact rather than opinion or commentary.

Whether this episode proves to be another fleeting internet firestorm or the opening salvo in a larger political and legal battle remains to be seen.

For now, what is undeniable is this: George Galloway has once again reminded Westminster — and YouTube — that in the age of clicks, outrage travels faster than evidence.