Boris Johnson named as Ex Prime Minister who had a Threesome with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

GALLOWAY DROPS POLITICAL NAPALM: “GRUSOME THREESOME” CLAIMS DRAG FORMER PM INTO SEX SCANDAL STORM.

The world of tickle tackle was set ablaze today after former MP George Galloway detonated what he called a political “truth bomb,” alleging that sealed Epstein-related material refers to a British prime minister participating in a sexual encounter “a gruesome threesome’ with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The claim was first touted by the writer behind The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Andrew Lownie, who said: "I have heard lots of talk about threesomes - including a threesome between Ghislaine and a British Prime Minister." When asked by the Daily Mail if it was a recent PM, Lownie responded: "A former Prime Minister, but it's not Winston Churchill."

READ MORE - 

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/uk-prime-minister-had-threesome-36685069

Speaking to his audience in trademark theatrical style via a video posted to YouTube, Galloway claimed a monologue, equal parts provocation and performance, dismissing various former leaders as unlikely candidates, name-checking Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak, Theresa May, Gordon Brown, and Tony Blair.

Galloway then made clear where his own suspicions lie.

“I am certain,” he told viewers, “that this gruesome threesome was completed by none other than Boris Johnson.”

Boris Johnson

The allegation was delivered without evidence, sourcing, or corroboration — and, as of publication, no document, court filing, or verified testimony has emerged linking Johnson to Epstein, Maxwell, or any such event.

Sex Addict?

Johnson has previously denied any improper connection to Epstein, and no law enforcement body in the UK or US has accused him of wrongdoing.

Still, the comments have ignited fierce debate online, with critics accusing Galloway of reckless defamation, while supporters frame the remarks as “asking questions” about elite power networks and historical proximity to Epstein.

Legal experts would note that repeating unproven allegations about identifiable individuals carries significant risk, particularly when framed as fact rather than opinion or commentary.

Whether this episode proves to be another fleeting internet firestorm or the opening salvo in a larger political and legal battle remains to be seen.

For now, what is undeniable is this: George Galloway has once again reminded Westminster — and YouTube — that in the age of clicks, outrage travels faster than evidence.

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court: AJ LASHBROOK IS GUILTY.

FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

READ MORE:

https://taylorskangaroocourt.wordpress.com/2026/01/31/aj-lashbrook-guilty-of-3-counts-of-spreading-lies-and-misinformation-with-intent-to-kill/

https://taylorskangaroocourt.wordpress.com/2025/09/17/taylors-kangaroo-court-degenerate-aj-lashbrook-exposes-his-own-perverse-mindset/

https://taylorskangaroocourt.wordpress.com/2025/09/04/taylors-kangaroo-court-the-case-of-aj-lashbrook-again/

https://taylorskangaroocourt.wordpress.com/2025/09/01/taylors-kangaroo-court-aj-degenerate-in-the-dock/

AJ of the Lucifer Family

There is a point at which online commentary stops being opinion and starts becoming something far more serious. Not because of tone, and not because of disagreement, but because of lies.

The issue at hand is not a single remark or isolated comment. In the online world, people say foolish things every day. What changes the nature of speech is repetition, amplification, and escalation.

Exhibit One begins with a crude and defamatory claim involving two adult men. It is sexualised, humiliating, and unsupported. On its own, some might dismiss it as online provocation.

But it did not stop there.

Exhibit Two saw the claim escalate into an allegation of sexual abuse involving a woman. At this point, the commentary moved beyond insult and into the realm of reputational destruction. Sexual abuse allegations are not rhetorical devices; they carry real-world consequences.

Then came Exhibit Three — the most serious escalation of all. The word rape was introduced. Once that word is publicly attached to named individuals, there is no rewind button. It alters perception permanently, regardless of whether evidence exists.

The Critical Contradiction

Here is where the matter becomes unavoidable.

The woman referenced in these claims was invited to comment publicly. Her response was simple and unambiguous:

“I’ve never come across AJ saying that.”

No outrage. No embellishment. Just a contradiction.

Following this, a direct question was put on the record:

"Will you take this opportunity to refute the claims being made that you were sexually abused and raped by Justin and I, on the night of your birthday in 2022?"

This was an opportunity for clarification. For confirmation. Or for denial.

What followed was silence.

False or unsubstantiated allegations do not exist in a vacuum. They isolate people, invite harassment, and can place individuals at real risk. Intent does not need to be proven for damage to occur.

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court Sentences AJ LASHBROOK to a Taylor Kangaroo YouTube Protection Order (TKYTO)

In the jurisdiction of Taylor’s Kangaroo Court — AJ Lashbrook has been found Guilty of 3 counts of spreading lies and misinformation, with intent to kill.

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court prohibits the Respondent, AJ Lashbrook (from the Fuckwit Family):-

1. Contacting by any means, directly or indirectly Kaley Einav, Jake Clark, Justin Pomeroy and Matt Taylor, or incite another person to do so; this includes but is not limited to contact in person, calls, letters, emails, messages, social media.

1. Entering West Sussex, East Sussex, Hampshire, Kent, Surrey, London, Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire, Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk and Cambridgeshire as defined by the exclusion zone on the attached map.

1. Attending any place you believe Kaley Einav, Jake Clark, Justin Pomeroy and Matt Taylor, is present, or remaining in that place once you are aware of their presence.

2. Posting or encouraging or inciting any other persons from posting on the internet or otherwise publishing or broadcasting any video, comment, opinion or other material which directly refers to Kaley Einav, Jake Clark, Justin Pomeroy and Matt Taylor. If directed to do so by your Police Offender Manager or other Police Office must remove any post under your control when requested to do so.

3. Having or using any Social Media, Social Networking, Gaming or Dating website unless with written permission of your police offender manager and having supplied username and emails associated with each site * The Oxford English Dictionary defines Social Media as “websites and software programs used for social networking” and Social Networking as “the use of dedicated websites and applications to interact with other users, or to find people with similar interests to one’s own”

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court requires the Respondent, AJ Lashbrook to be aware:-

This Order will last until 31 December 2039.

A person who, without reasonable excuse, breaches an YouTube Protection Order commits an offence. A person guilty of an offence is liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine or both, or on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine or both.

I've been Accused of Rape!

READ MORE - https://mttv.substack.com/p/ive-been-accused-of-rape