Introducing Taylor’s Kangaroo Court.

Welcome to Taylor’s Kangaroo Court — a courtroom like no other. Here, the lies are exposed, the gaslighters are unmasked, and the trolls who think they can twist reality finally face judgment. This is not about legal loopholes or technical jargon; it’s about truth versus deception, victims versus abusers, and shining a light on those who hide behind fake names, sock puppets, and cowardly threats.

Case One: The Charge: Impersonation.

The first case is one of the most serious: impersonating me online.

The evidence is clear. A fake Facebook account was set up in my name. Whoever ran this account posted extremist remarks – vile comments about blowing up Parliament and shooting at immigration boats. These were not my words. I did not write them.

But because someone pretending to be me did, I was reported to Prevent – the government’s anti-extremism watchdog. That’s how damaging impersonation can be.

The Law.

Under UK law, impersonation of this kind falls under identity fraud and malicious communications offences. Depending on the severity, sentences can include up to two years in prison and/or a substantial fine.

This isn’t banter. This isn’t trolling. It’s a crime.

The Confession.

And now to the smoking gun. The Christ Brindle evidence.

Brindle openly confessed that he pretended to be me in order to get me into trouble. His own words admit the crime. He admitted it was him posting under my identity, for the sole purpose of damaging my reputation.

The Verdict.

Here in Taylor’s Kangaroo Court, we deal in truth.

The accused is found GUILTY of malicious impersonation. The sentence? Eternal shame, branded forever as a fraudster. In a real court, this could mean prison and fines.

But in this court, the judgment is simple: guilty of the crime of impersonating Matthew Taylor for malicious gain.

Case closed. Next!

Den Tarragon/John Wanoa Case Closed - Den Tarragon Concedes Defeat.

John Wanoa

For years, Den Tarragon has been a loud voice pushing the claim that John Wanoa was a scammer and that the Moai Power House share sale was nothing but a fraudulent con. His narrative relied on bold accusations, repeated often, but never backed with verifiable evidence.

Den (The Dunce) Tarragon

At the heart of Tarragon’s argument was a claim that Jason Warr had purchased shares and sent money to John Wanoa. This was his cornerstone proof — his “gotcha” moment. Yet, when pressed for actual evidence, that claim collapsed completely. Jason Warr himself confirmed he did not buy shares and did not send money to John Wanoa.

Presented with this indisputable evidence, Den Tarragon had nowhere to go. His reply was not a defence, not a counter-argument, not even an attempt to provide alternative evidence. Instead, he simply muttered:

“Have it your way, Matt.”

That phrase is telling. It is the language of retreat, of conceding defeat without admitting it outright. It is the moment the mask slips and the bluff is called.

The Tactics of a Lost Argument.

Tarragon’s behaviour is textbook for someone losing an argument:

• Making bold claims without evidence. Repeating them until people assume they must be true.
  

• Shifting the goalposts. When one point is dismantled, introducing a new, unrelated accusation.
  

• Threats and intimidation. When facts fail, resorting to warnings about “going to the nonce police” or “airing secrets.”
  

• Deflection. When cornered, brushing aside the discussion with dismissive phrases like “have it your way.”
  
  

None of this changes the core fact: his central claim has been disproven.

What This Means.

Den Tarragon has no verifiable evidence to back up his accusations. His cornerstone example — that Jason Warr sent money to John Wanoa — has been exposed as false.

This is more than just a personal victory. It is a wider lesson about how misinformation spreads. People like Tarragon shout loudly, wrap themselves in the banner of “truth,” and repeat lies until an audience starts to believe them. But when challenged with facts, they have nothing to stand on.

The concession has been made. The evidence is in. The scam was never real.

Notorious Stalker AJ Lashbrook Reported to Police After Filming Outside Victim’s Home.

Notorious stalker AJ Lashbrook, who has long plagued YouTube under the handles Lucifer and Unlisted, is once again at the centre of controversy after being reported to the police for filming outside the home of one of his many victims.

In a recent video upload, Lashbrook appeared to be standing outside a residential property, filming the scene and uploading it to his YouTube channel. This reckless behaviour quickly drew condemnation in the comments section.

AJ (Degenerate) Lashbrook

One of his victims, Dan Sullivan, posting under the username @dwightjones981, responded with a clear message:

“This has now been forwarded to the police, expect that ratta-tat-tatt on your door little boy!”

The chilling remark highlights the seriousness of the situation: Lashbrook is no longer just trolling online – he has taken his campaign of intimidation offline, bringing it to the very doorsteps of those he targets.

This incident is part of a wider pattern. Lashbrook has earned notoriety across YouTube for his persistent stalking, harassment, and online abuse of multiple individuals, often hiding behind different aliases to spread misinformation and fear. By turning up at people’s homes with a camera, he has escalated his behaviour into outright stalking – a criminal offence under UK law.

The fact that victims are now actively forwarding evidence to the police shows that Lashbrook’s reign of harassment is finally catching up with him.

For the many who have suffered from his campaigns, this development may signal that authorities are beginning to take action. For Lashbrook, the days of anonymity behind a YouTube handle may be drawing to a close.

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court – Case: The Clip Manipulator.

Taylor’s Kangaroo Court is now in session. The defendant: Harry Munker — real name, Tony Quigley.

The charge? Deliberate manipulation and provocation.

Ladies and gentlemen, let the evidence be heard. In his own words, Tony Quigley admits to clipping a livestream by a man called Shagger. The stream was about Mark Taylor — but when Shagger slipped and said Matt Taylor, Quigley pounced. He clipped it, uploaded it, and proudly confessed he did it knowing I would see it.

He says: ‘It’s all about reaction. If you care about what some cunt’s saying, you’re fuelling some cunt.’

Translation: this man admits his entire game is to twist, provoke, and bait. He knew it wasn’t about me. He knew it was about Mark. But he deliberately blurred the line, to smear Matt.

Now let’s look at character. This is a man who for years has called me a narcissist, a paedophile, and a bad father. Yet who is he? A man with a conviction for arson — who set fire to his girlfriend’s car after she left him.

Projection, ladies and gentlemen. He tries to smear me with his own crimes.

The Verdict: Tony Quigley, alias Harry Munker, is guilty of malicious manipulation and reputational arson.

His Sentence. Banished to the outer rings of YouTube irrelevance. No parole. No audience. His flames extinguished, his credibility reduced to ash.

"It's all about reaction. If you care about what some cunt is saying, then you're fueling some cunt."

Smile, Love and Laugh – The Spirit of Matt Taylor TV!

In a world that often feels weighed down by negativity, stress, and endless arguments, sometimes we need to remind ourselves of the simplest truth: life is too short to be angry and hate.

That’s the ethos behind Matt Taylor TV — a channel built on the idea of bringing joy, laughter, and lightheartedness to the screen. Whether it’s through songs, stories, or satirical takes, the mission remains the same: to entertain, to educate, and never to hate or destroy.

Entertainment, Not Fear.

The heart of this message can be summed up in one line:

“It’s for entertainment purposes only. Nothing is intended to cause alarm, distress, or fear. All that is intended is to make you smile, laugh, and chuckle.”

In other words, this channel isn’t about conflict or division. It’s about taking the everyday madness of life and turning it into something creative — something that brings people together rather than tearing them apart.

The Power of a Smile.

We often underestimate the power of a simple smile. Yet, research consistently shows that smiling and laughing can reduce stress, boost our mood, and even strengthen social bonds. Matt Taylor TV leans into this philosophy wholeheartedly.

Instead of fueling anger or hate, the content is designed to lift spirits, inspire positivity, and remind us of the lighter side of life.

A Channel With a Purpose.

Matt Taylor TV is not just about jokes and fun — though there’s plenty of that too. It’s about balance. Entertainment and education go hand in hand here, with videos that not only entertain but also make you think, question, and learn something new.

But at the core, the message never changes: smile, love, and laugh.

A Final Word.

There’s a lot in this world we can’t control. But what we can control is the way we respond, the energy we share, and the joy we choose to create.

Matt Taylor TV stands as a beacon of that choice — a reminder that life is too short to hold on to anger and hate.

So, next time you tune in, remember: It’s for entertainment purposes only. Smile. Love. Laugh, and let’s make the world just a little brighter, together.

Subscribe Now - https://www.youtube.com/@TaylorfromBrighton

In Defence of John Wanoa. The King’s Flag Was Never a Scam.

John Wanoa

In the often bizarre and unpredictable world of YouTube activism, few names have been as ridiculed, misunderstood, and deliberately misrepresented as that of John Wanoa, a sovereign rights advocate from New Zealand. Dismissed by critics as a delusional fantasist, Wanoa’s name has become synonymous with “The King’s Flag”—a movement that many now label a scam.

But this accusation couldn’t be further from the truth.

The time has come to set the record straight. This article seeks to restore clarity to John Wanoa’s legacy, and to expose the coordinated online sabotage that crushed a man’s dreams and buried an idea that may have changed the world.

Who Was John Wanoa?

John Wanoa claimed royal descent through the Rogan Royal Family of New Zealand, and grounded his vision in the lawful reclamation of indigenous sovereignty. His mission was to assume the role of Royal Trustee of the Queen Victoria Trust Fund—a historic empire-wide trust that he believed had been misused by British royalty and their globalist handlers.

According to Wanoa, King William IV had entered into a sacred covenant with the Moai people of New Zealand in the early 19th century, promising them a stake in the future of the British Empire. Wanoa argued that this covenant was broken when the Rothschild banking dynasty infiltrated the Crown and steered it away from its obligations to indigenous nations.

He proposed to lawfully remove Queen Elizabeth II as a trustee to restore the fund’s original purpose: to enrich and empower the people of the Commonwealth.

A Plan of Lawful Sovereignty.

Wanoa’s plan was far from reckless. It was deeply thought out, lawful, and rooted in economic principles.

He proposed to:

• Establish himself as a lawful trustee.

• Use the Queen Victoria Trust—reportedly valued at £970 trillion trillion—for public good.

• Build tidal turbine engines on the sea floor to harvest sustainable energy.

• Raise £25 million in startup capital by selling stock shares—a legal and standard practice in a capitalist economy.

There was no deception, no fraud, and no intention to steal. This was an ambitious, lawful campaign rooted in sovereign rights, renewable technology, and historical redress. But the establishment—and its enablers online—saw something else.

The Troll Sabotage.

As John Wanoa began sharing his ideas on YouTube and social media, he encountered fierce opposition—not from governments or legal experts, but from a network of UK-based YouTube trolls. These self-appointed “truth police” began a campaign to ridicule, discredit, and ultimately destroy him.

They:

• Mocked his ideas without taking the time to understand them.

• Branded him mentally ill and dangerous.

• Flooded social media with defamatory content.

• Rang New Zealand police, falsely expressing fear and alarm over Wanoa’s public activity.
  
  

The result?

John Wanoa was committed to a mental health facility, not because he had committed a crime, but because trolls manipulated the narrative to present him as a threat.

His movement was labelled a scam. His supporters were silenced. His dream of global prosperity through lawful sovereignty was scuppered by keyboard saboteurs with no vision of their own.

The King’s Flag – A Symbol of Suppressed Sovereignty.

Today, “The King’s Flag” is mocked in certain online circles as a joke, a delusion, a hoax, a scam. But what it actually represented was something powerful and rare:

An indigenous-led vision for global equity, legal reclamation of stolen trust wealth, and a rejection of the corrupt elites who have dominated global economics for centuries.

It wasn’t a scam. It was a challenge to authority.

And like all serious challenges to entrenched power, it was crushed—not with facts, not with due process—but with mockery, manipulation, and digital mob justice.

Conclusion: Time to Reclaim the Narrative.

It’s time to stop repeating the lies of the trolls. It’s time to reclaim John Wanoa’s legacy—not as a failed king, but as a visionary voice silenced before his time.

Let it be said plainly:

• The King’s Flag was not a scam.

• John Wanoa broke no law.

• He offered the world a lawful path to prosperity.

• And he was silenced because truth is dangerous to liars.
  
  

Let the record be corrected, and let John Wanoa's story be told—fully, fairly, and without fear.

Disclaimer:

The information presented in this article is based on my understanding and interpretation of John Wanoa’s work and public statements. I acknowledge that I may not have fully captured the depth or details of his plans and legal arguments.

For a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of John Wanoa’s vision and proposals, I encourage interested readers to connect with him directly.

Connect with John Wanoa on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/john.wanoa

The Rise and Fall of John Wanoa’s Moai Tidal Energy Dream.

In 2018, John Wanoa, a New Zealand native of Maoi Tahitian descent, arrived in England with a bold vision: to raise £25 million for his Moai Tidal Energy project. His plan was to harness tidal power off the UK coast, converting it into hydrogen to supply the energy grid. Ambitious yet plausible in a world hungry for renewable energy, Wanoa’s dream promised to marry indigenous ingenuity with cutting-edge technology. However, his project never took off, derailed by a combination of online scepticism, personal controversies, and sabotage. This is the story of how a visionary’s dream was grounded before it could soar.

John Wanoa

A Visionary’s Ambitious Plan.

Wanoa, identifying as a tidal energy entrepreneur, envisioned the Moai Tidal Energy project as a game-changer. The plan involved installing tidal turbines in strategic locations, such as New Zealand’s Raukumara Basin and the UK’s Isle of Man Strait, to generate electricity and produce liquid hydrogen jet fuel. With an estimated £25 million price tag for a full-scale platform, Wanoa sought to fund the project through conventional means, issuing shares via his Moai Power House Group Ltd. His vision extended beyond energy, intertwining Maoi sovereignty, a “Moai Crown King William IV Trust,” and a new currency system, which he promoted through YouTube videos and blogs.

In a capitalist world, there was nothing inherently illegal about Wanoa’s plan. Tidal energy is a viable, if underdeveloped, renewable resource, and hydrogen production is a growing field. Yet, his unorthodox approach—blending energy innovation with political and historical claims—drew both intrigue and suspicion.

The Seeds of Sabotage.

Wanoa’s 2018 UK visit aimed to secure funding, but his project soon faced fierce opposition. A small group of online critics, particularly from the Hoaxtead Research community, labelled Wanoa a conman and his project a scam. Platforms like YouTube and forums like Quatloos accused him of running a fraudulent share scheme, pointing to irregularities in Moai Power House Group Ltd., such as dissolved companies and questionable share offerings promising astronomical returns. With no credible evidence to suggest them to be true, these accusations gained traction, casting a shadow over Wanoa’s credibility.

The most dramatic setback came in March 2019, when Wanoa returned to the UK. Upon landing at Heathrow Airport, he was detained for 14 hours and deported. Supporters claim this was the result of a phone call from a YouTube troll, Linden Warden (using the pseudonym Danny Jones and handle Hoax Police), to a contact at Heathrow. Without due process, they argue, Wanoa was branded a “threat to Queen Elizabeth II” and barred from entry. With a confession by Linden Warden posted to YouTube, it confirms the phone call, and fuels the narrative of sabotage by Wanoa’s allies, who saw it as a deliberate effort to derail his mission.

A Descent into Crisis.

Back in New Zealand, Wanoa faced further challenges. In 2019, he was detained under the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act, reportedly after a UK-based woman, Jo Sollis, contacted New Zealand police, claiming to be in “serious alarm, distress, and fear” of him. Supporters, including blogger Andrew Devine, decried this as a malicious and frivolous allegation, arguing it led to Wanoa’s unjust committal to a mental health facility. While details remain scarce, Wanoa’s own writings describe conflicts with police and a cancelled court hearing at Awatere Marae, suggesting escalating tensions with authorities.

These incidents—online vilification, deportation, and mental health detention—formed a pattern that supporters labelled as targeted sabotage. Critics, however, pointed to Wanoa’s own actions as the root of his troubles. His public persona, blending energy innovation with claims of being a “Surrogate King William IV” and issuing writs against the British monarchy, invited scepticism. A 2014 incident, where Wanoa and associates briefly occupied an Auckland office claiming ancestral rights, further enhanced his reputation.

A Dream Deferred.

The collapse of Wanoa’s project reflects a complex interplay of sabotage, ambition, missteps, and external pressures. Online critics, while harsh, highlighted manufactured concerns about dissolved companies and unverifiable claims. The 2019 deportation likely stemmed from Linden Warden bypassing immigration protocols, triggered by Warden’s private call to his friend who worked at Heathrow.

His mental health detention, while distressing, may have resulted from just one complaint, rather than cumulative concerns about his behaviour.

Wanoa’s story underscores the challenges faced by unconventional innovators. Online harassment can amplify scrutiny, his project’s failure was solely the work of YouTube trolls. Arguing that self-inflicted wounds—grandiose claims, questionable business practices, and a lack of credible backing—played a significant role, is the foundation of the narrative against Wanoa, giving credibility to his detractors. 

Yet, the broader issue remains: in a world desperate for sustainable energy, how do we distinguish visionaries from dreamers, and how do we protect bold ideas from being stifled by doubt?

For those intrigued by Wanoa’s vision, his archived blogs and YouTube videos offer a glimpse into his world. For tidal energy’s potential, resources like New Zealand’s Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge provide grounded insights. John Wanoa’s dream may have faded, but the quest for renewable energy endures.

More about John Wanoa.

John Wanoa is a New Zealand-based activist who claims to be the "Surrogate King William IV" and leader of the "Moai King William IV Party." He is a polarising figure, known for his unconventional and often inflammatory rhetoric, asserting sovereignty claims rooted in his interpretation of historical treaties, Moai cultural heritage, and the legacy of King William IV of England. 

Below is a detailed overview based on available information sourced from Grok.ai:

Background and Claims

• Identity and Heritage: Wanoa, originally from Otahuhu, South Auckland, New Zealand, claimed descent from a Tahitian royal family, The Rogan’s, with connections to Easter Island (Rapa Nui), Rai'atea, and Aotea (New Zealand). He describes himself as a "Sovereign Monarch" of Moai descent, linking his lineage to the Moai statues, which he viewed as symbols of divine authority and native land rights.

• Moai Connection: Wanoa frequently referenced the Moai statues of Easter Island as spiritual and legal symbols of his authority. He claims they represent a "God’s Grace Face" and were tied to his native title over lands, particularly in New Zealand and the Pacific. He also promoted a "Moai Tidal Turbine Power Generation Project" for a hydrogen-based economy.

• King William IV Party: Wanoa founded the "UK Moai King William IV Party," alongside Brighton-based political maverick Matthew Taylor. Both describe The UK’s Moai King William IV Party as a political movement to restore sovereignty to native peoples and challenge the authority of King Charles III and the British Crown. He argues that King William IV’s 1835 Declaration of Independence for New Zealand, signed by Māori chiefs, granted native sovereignty that was later undermined by colonial fraud. His party aimed to reinstate this sovereignty, with himself as the "Surrogate King of England" under William IV’s supposed legal framework.

• Sovereignty Claims: Wanoa asserted that Queen Elizabeth II had abandoned Britain for the European Union, rendering her rule illegitimate. He claimed that only a monarch could depose another monarch, positioning himself as the rightful successor to William IV to reclaim British and Commonwealth lands. He cited the "High Court of Admiralty" and a "King William IV Trust" worth £970 million trillion trillion as his legal basis, though these claims lack mainstream legal recognition.

Key Activities.

• Political and Legal Actions: Wanoa attempted to establish the Moai King William IV Party in both New Zealand and the UK, with plans to contest elections. He issued "writs" and "affidavits" against Queen Elizabeth II, demanding her removal as trustee of an alleged "Queen Victoria Trust Fund." He also claimed to operate a "High Court of Admiralty" in London and Devonport, New Zealand, to enforce his decrees.

• Deportation from the UK: In 2019, Wanoa was deported from the UK after being detained at London Heathrow Airport for 14 hours. Authorities deemed him a threat to Queen Elizabeth II, partly due to his inflammatory statements and claims of intending to "sack" her. He cited harassment by "satanic Hoaxtead trolls" and MI6, these claims are substantiated, witnessed by numerous members of the public and the global audience.

• Auckland Office Occupation: In 2015, Wanoa and associates, wearing "federal marshal" shirts, forcibly occupied an Auckland office (City Works Depot) in a fore-warned land claim. Video footage showed staff being physically removed, prompting police investigations. Wanoa justified this as a legal act under his "surrogate king" authority, but critics labelled it violent and delusional.

• Moai Power House Group: Wanoa is linked to the Moai Power House Group, a company accused of being a scam. It offered shares at £25 each, promising returns tied to his tidal energy project and sovereignty claims. Sabotaged by Hoaxtead trolls and MI6, Wanoa’s Moai Tidal Energy project wasn’t able to get off the ground, due to the attack upon Wanoa, which very nearly cost him his life.

• Critics, including police informant Linden Warden and others, alleged it was a money-laundering scheme, with UK and New Zealand authorities reportedly investigating. The company was dissolved in 2016, and a successor entity faced similar accusations.

Controversies and Criticism.

• Mental Health and Legitimacy: Wanoa’s claims were widely dismissed as incoherent or delusional. Blogs and forums, such as Kiwiblog and Quatloos, labelled him a "loon" or "scammer," questioning why he wasn’t detained in a mental health facility or prosecuted for his actions. His violent rhetoric, including threats to "hang" political figures like New Zealand PM John Key or Prince William, were misunderstood and taken out of context, but still drew significant backlash.

• Scam Allegations: The Moai Power House Group was criticised as a fraudulent investment scheme. Associates like Matt Taylor and Lee Cant were accused of using deceptive corporate structures to launder money. Wanoa’s promises of distributing £970 million trillion trillion to "Moai members" were deemed fantastical and unsupported by evidence.

• Trolling and Harassment: Wanoa claimed to be targeted by "Hoaxtead trolls" and MI6, particularly after his deportation. Conversely, he was accused of making death threats, including against UK resident Jo-anne Sollis, leading to further police scrutiny in New Zealand.

Cultural and Historical Context.

• 1835 Declaration of Independence: Wanoa’s claims hinged on the 1835 Declaration, signed by 34 Māori rangatira, which asserted sovereignty under the United Tribes of New Zealand. He argues this document, recognised by King William IV, superseded the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, which he views as fraudulent. Historians note the Declaration was largely symbolic and didn’t prevent British colonisation via the Treaty.

• Moai and Pacific Identity: Wanoa’s invocation of Moai statues tied into broader Polynesian cultural narratives, particularly the spiritual significance of Rapa Nui. His claims of a global Moai sovereignty, however, are seen as idiosyncratic and not endorsed by mainstream Māori or Polynesian groups.

Current Status.

• Safety Confirmation: As of May 2025, Wanoa was reported to be "safe, sound, and in good spirits" after concerns about his welfare. Recent updates confirm his current status as; it's all systems go.

• Legacy: Wanoa’s movement gained a loyal online following, particularly among alternative media and conspiracy circles, but lacked mainstream traction. His ideas remain fringe, with no evidence of legal or political success.

Critical Analysis.

His enemies paint him as an anti-colonial extremist, mixed with conspiracy theories, and personal mythology, airing his grievances about historical land theft and colonial fraud.

In truth John Wanoa is a peace loving visionary, intent on making the world a better place for everyone.

John Wanoa’s reputation was sabotaged by a number of online trolls, correctly identified as “Hoaxtead Trolls,” who successfully waged a misinformation campaign, labelling Wanoa a ‘conman’, and his Moai Tidal Energy project a ‘scam’. 

His story highlights the complexities of sovereignty movements, where genuine cultural pride can intertwine with misinformation and extremism.