Wednesday, 26 June 2019
Tuesday, 25 June 2019
Time is Running Out for Queen Elizabeth II
In
news you won’t hear on the BBC’s Ten O’Clock News, a Moai King
on the other side of the world, is claiming to have dethroned British
Queen Elizabeth II, having sacked her as the Trustee of the Queen
Victoria Fund, bequeathed to the British and Common-Wealth people by
Queen Victoria’s predecessor, King William IV.
While most people will see 'Moai' mis-spelt, John Wanoa 69, born in New Zealand, claims the Moairi tribes of New Zealand, (made famous with the All Black’s Haka dance at their rugby matches), are a British made-tribe, forcibly introduced into New Zealand In the late 18th Century, to force out the indigenous people.
D-Day - 29 June 2019
 |
| Surrogate King William IV - John Wanoa |
While most people will see 'Moai' mis-spelt, John Wanoa 69, born in New Zealand, claims the Moairi tribes of New Zealand, (made famous with the All Black’s Haka dance at their rugby matches), are a British made-tribe, forcibly introduced into New Zealand In the late 18th Century, to force out the indigenous people.
Surrogate King William IV
Calling
himself the Surrogate King William IV Monarch, John Wanoa speaks like
a King, though doesn’t necessarily lives like a King, having been
forced to sleep in his car, having been denied entry into Britain,
deemed a threat to the Queen.
- Read more: Queen Elizabeth II in Danger
Part
of an ever growing subculture called the Truth Movement, King John
Wanoa, (as his followers call him,) regularly appears on Facebook and
Youtube, broadcasting hour long broadcasts, explaining his plans for
global domination and salvation.
“I’ve
sacked the Queen.”
Claiming
Queen Elizabeth II has abandoned her Kingdom, John Wanoa has issued a
Writ of Control and Possession, claiming higher authority over the
Queen Bench, by issuing his Writ in the higher authority of the
King’s Bench.
- Read more: King John Wanoa is Coming to sack the Queen…
D-Day - 29 June 2019
With
only 4 days left for Queen Elizabeth II to refute the claims made
within his Writ, its predicted a number of his followers with adopt
the 8 point star of St Patrick’s Star, giving the holder’s the
authority of King’s Sheriff's, tasked with arresting and detaining
Queen Elizabeth II.
 |
| Daryl Payan - King's Sheriff |
The
Veterans
Having
caused a split within the Truth Movement, 4.8 million veterans of the
British Army, represented by the maverick Simon Bean MBE, have
decided to align their allegiance with the Queen, accusing the King
Bench of John Wanoa, to be a scam and treasonous.
John
Wanoa will save the world
Leading
the fastest growing sector in the Truth Movement, more and more
people are joining John Wanoa’s King Bench, as a viable and
distinct alternative to the politics of the day.
With
disillusionment in our politician’s at an all time high, more and
more people are taking an interest in a King from the other side of
the world, who is promising to come to the UK and demolish the status
quo.
Promising
a cash injection of £970 million trillion trillion, a new tidal
energy/hydrogen power economy and relying on the Laws of King William
IV, John Wanoa envisages a world in which poverty, child-abuse and
war, are all things of the past.
Welcome
to the Andy Devine Show
Proudly
promoting John Wanoa, and a number of other prominent whistle-blowers
in the Truth Movement, the Andy Devine Show is becoming the focal
point for John’s followers to meet, plan and discuss the on-going
adventures of King John.
Broadcasting
on Facebook and Youtube, The
Andy Devine Show
can
be found here
on
Youtube. To learn more about the UK
Moai King William IV Party,
simply click here.
Links embedded
Top 10 Misconceptions about King Arthur
Introduction
King Arthur is the world’s best loved King, as popular as any other King in Human history, including King Tutankhamun, King Solomon or even the King of all Kings, Jesus Christ. What most people may not be aware of, is that what we know of King Arthur today, is based on a number of misconceptions from the Victorian era. Now for the first time in over 1500 years, historical detectives Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, have rediscovered the truth about King Arthur, and that there were in-fact two great King Arthur's, who have been mistakenly rolled into one. King Arthur II was a real historical figure, who’s life and times, has been well documented in the ancient Welsh Khurmic records. As the prophecy of King Arthur begins to come true, here are the top 10 misconceptions about King Arthur, based on the historical research of Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett.
 |
| Wildflower Mona Graphics 2015 |
Delivering
a steady and staple diet of Hollywood movies, the legend of King
Arthur has been told and retold throughout the ages. Prophesied to
return in the UK’s darkest hour, King Arthur’s myth has endured
throughout the centuries and has never disappeared from the British
psyche.
While
the main characters of King Arthur’s story are set in stone; namely
Excalibur, Merlin, Guinevere and the Round Table, there are a number
of common misconceptions about King Arthur which most people don’t
know. The first is that King Arthur didn't need to pull a sword from
a stone to become King. He was born to be King.
Rediscovered
by historical detectives Alan
Wilson
and
Baram Blackett, the legend of King Arthur is being retold, in a way
never heard before since the Dark Ages. Having published a number of
books on the subject, ranging from ‘Arthur The War King,’
‘Artorius
Rex Discovered,’
‘The
King Arthur Conspiracy’
and
‘Moses
in the Hieroglyphs’,
here are the top 10 misconceptions of King Arthur, based on the
historical research of Alan
Wilson and Baram Blackett.
 |
| Wildflower Mona Graphics |
10.
There was more than one King Arthur
There
were actually up to five King Arthur's in Britain’s ancient
history. The first King Arthur was the eldest son of Magnus Maximus,
grandson of the British Constantine the Great, Emperor of Rome. King
Arthur I lived between 355-388AD in Britain and according to the
ancient Welsh chronicles, (the
basis of Wilson and Blackett’s research),
in 383AD conquered Gaul, Spain, Southern Germany, Switzerland and
Italy; maintaining the royal dynasty, which would see the second King
Arthur born on Christmas day 503AD, nearly 125 years later.
King
Arthur II was born to Queen Onbrawst and King Maurice. Grandson of
the Paramount Pendragon King Theoderic, whose royal lineage was
claimed to go all the way back to the Holy family, to Anne, sister of
Mary, mother of Jesus Christ. King Arthur II united Britain and laid
the foundations for the King Arthur legend we remember today. An easy
way to differentiate between the two most famous King Arthur’s in
British history, is to remember that King Arthur I fought the Romans,
and King Arthur II fought the Saxons.
9.
King Arthur didn’t pull a sword from a stone to become King
All
the King Arthur’s throughout history were born into their roles,
and neither King Arthur I or King Arthur II, needed to pull a sword
from a stone to claim their right to rule. Royal inheritance was
passed down between father and son; though as was the custom in
ancient Celt society, if the son wasn’t fit to rule, then an uncle,
cousin or nephew would naturally take over the role. This happened to
King Arthur II, were upon his father King Maurice suffering an injury
that left him lame, found himself Paramount King of all Britain at
the age of 15-years-old. He would go onto win 12 decisive battles
against the Saxons, Picts and Scots; uniting Britain under one King,
and building the foundations of a nation we call ‘Great Britain’
today.
The
myth that King Arthur pulled a sword from a stone, from which only
the rightful King of Britain could pull; is based on the vivid
imagination of 15th-century-french-writer Chretien de Troyes, who
first wrote about the Arthurian adventures, probably based on the
12th-century-historian Geoffrey of Monmouth's book, 'The History of
the Kings of Britain.' Both Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett claim
Geoffrey of Monmouth, made the mistake of joining both the historical
King Arthur’s into one, and thus muddling ancient British history
for centuries to come.
8.
Merlin was not a wizard
Fictionalised
as a wise old wizard and reinforced by countless Hollywood and TV
films and shows, Merlin wasn’t actually a wizard, but a renowned
and respected war-lord in his own right, who taught a young King
Arthur everything he needed to know about being a great warrior.
Quoted from ‘King Arthur The War King’ book; here is a young King
Arthur’s school report; “Arthur
was not the biggest or the strongest of the youths at Merlin Emry’s
castle, yet he was by far the cleverest. In the mock fights and duels
which they thought out to practice with their weapons, he was quite
often beaten, but when tempers flared, and occasionally fought
angrily with each other as boys do, he always emerged the winner.”
Common
in 5th-6th century Celtic culture, boys from the nobility aged
7-14-years-old, were either sent into the clergy and taught to the
priests, or sent to military camp to become warriors. Luckily for the
future of Britain, a young King Arthur II was sent to the North Welsh
mountains, to be taught by the old war-lord Merlin and other warriors
of note, Moro and Tegid; who taught Arthur (and his peers), warfare,
military strategy, how to read and write, count, play guitar, dance
and win wars.
7.
Guinevere didn’t have an affair with Lancelot
 |
| Wildflower Mona Graphics |
Reinforced by Hollywood as a adulterous wife sneaking behind King Arthur's, back to sleep with his best friend; nothing could be further than the truth, (though with the Chinese Whispers, whispering throughout the centuries, it's easy to see why Guinevere was painted in such a ‘scarlet’ light.) Lancelot was a peer of King Arthur II called King Maelgwyn Gwynedd, and never had any sexual relations with Guinevere!
According
to ancient Welsh poems and stories the young Queen Guinevere (spelt
Gwenhwyfar in Welsh), did have trouble adapting to court life. (Much
the same as today with Meghan Markle's marriage to Prince Harry.)
It’s
said that Gwenhwyfar had tearful temper tantrums, and during one
particular meal the young Queen was deliberately polite and charming
to a particular young soldier, to arouse jealousy with her husband
for being excluded from state affairs and other such matters of Kings
importance. Its recounted that King Arthur wasn’t too happy and
banished her to the Queen’s quarters for the next three days.
Gwenhwyfar would soon become accustomed to role as wife of a
Paramount King of all Britain, and come to terms with her husband’s
responsibilities and needs. Gwenhwyfar and Arthur would go onto have
two children, Noe and Morgan.
6.
King Arthur created The Round Table
Muddling
ancient British history for centuries to come, 12th-century-historian
Geoffrey of Monmouth really has made a hash of ancient British
history, though to his credit, he did get some things right. For
example, King Arthur really did create the Round Table.
Breaking
tradition with the established seating plan of the most important
people at the top, with the less important people to the left, right
and below, King Arthur blew all that elitist tradition away, by
adopting a round table, at which everyone had an equal say and
presence. King Arthur heralded in an new era of equality, leadership
and innovation. Many of King Arthur’s innovations, laws and
principles, were copied by the Plantagenet
royal dynasty,
(who
reigned Britain from 1154 to 1485);
building the foundations of British life today.
5.
King Arthur invented the Summer 'Festive' Games
Having
driven the Saxon hordes from their lands, and united the Kingdom,
King Arthur had brought peace and prosperity to his people, but
needed something to keep his highly trained, battle-ready and
experienced army, busy and occupied. King Arthur’s Great Festival
Games was his answer. Every year to celebrate Easter, he would hold a
Summer Festive Games, in which everyone from his Kingdom, from young
apprentices, to Freeman, to Nobleman, to battled hardened veterans;
could compete against each other, across a wide and varied range of
competitions, including horse races, sword-and-shield contests,
hounds and falcon competitions, archery, you name it, you could
compete in it. It’s mentioned in ‘King Arthur The War King’,
that King Arthur himself, ‘laughed and congratulated the winners
when he lost, setting the correct example of the games’.
Attracting
Kings, Queen’s, Princes, Princesses, Noble-men, Free-men, and
travellers from across the nation, (and abroad from Brittany), the
Summer ‘Festive’ Games would last for 12 days, (one day for each
apostle), and end with an Easter parade lead by King Arthur himself,
carrying various Holy relics and his shield, (depicting
the Virgin Mary holding the baby Jesus in her arms),
through the city, followed by his priests and bishops.
4.
King Arthur’s son did not kill him
While
incest may have been a concern for 17th and 18th century Saxon and
Norman royal dynasties, no such issues were a concern during the
lives of the ancient Welsh royal families. Hollywood of the 21st
century, has always depicted the demise of King Arthur to be a sordid
and murky affair of family incest, betrayal and murder, but contrary
to modern gossip and rumour, there was no history of incest, murder
and betrayal in any of the Welsh royal dynasties of ancient Britain.
According
to the historical research of Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett
published in their book ‘Artorius
Rex Discovered’,
Modred was his nephew and his sons were called Morgan and Noe. King
Arthur died sometime in 567AD in Kentucky America. The truth is often
more amazing than fiction, and in the case of King Arthur II, that’s
definitely true. Keep reading and you’ll find out just how King
Arthur II really died; (no doubt the same way King Arthur I died
too!)
3.
King Arthur didn’t give Excalibur to the Lady of the Lake
King
Arthur didn’t return Excalibur to the ‘Lady in the Lake’,
fatally wounded. While the truth of King Arthur II’s death is even
more spectacular than most people would ever imagine; the notion that
a mysterious amphibious-type woman, lived in a lake, took custody of
a sword, is french romantic rubbish and obviously never happened.
The
hard truth about the King Arthur story, is that there was no ‘magical
sword’ called ‘Excalibur’, that mysteriously found itself stuck
into a stone. There was no quest for the Holy Grail, and there was
definitely never a ‘Lady of the Lake’, who regained ownership of
Excalibur upon King Arthur’s final demise.
2.
King Arthur didn’t die in battle
The
truth of how the legendary King Arthur II actually died is more
amazing than you'll ever imagine; though luckily for you you're about
to find out. He didn't die in battle at the hands of his son Mordred;
instead, he died having taken off his armour after a strenuous day
battling the red Indians of Kentucky USA. A solitary native Indian
boy had slipped through the medieval defenses and stealthily crept
up to him unseen, before plunging his spear into his heart, ending
the life of Britain’s greatest hero. Long live the King.
An
ancient Welsh poem recalls the story of his body and belongings being
wrapped in three deer skins sewn together, and sailed back across the
Atlantic, to return his remains to his birth land. Laid in a cave in
the Welsh countryside, King Arthur II’s bones were finally laid to
rest on the grounds of Christianity's first church, St Peter’s
Church in Glamorgan, South Wales. Until today, his remains lay
undisturbed.
1.
King Arthur’s Kingdom was destroyed by asteroid debris
King
Arthur II’s kingdom was destroyed by asteroid debris in 562AD. The
destruction has been remembered in history as the ‘Dark
Ages’.
With most of Britain devastated, the land toxic and unfarmable for
between 7-11 years, nothing could stop the Saxons pouring in once the
land became habitable again. King
Arthur II’s brother Madoc,
had just returned from across the Atlantic bringing back a black
skinned man, with stories of a great land without Kings. An ancient
Welsh poem recounts the dozens of questions King Arthur asked the
traveler about the new land. In this time of crisis and a last ditch
effort to save his people, King Arthur II salvaged what he could,
built 700 ships and sailed his whole army across the Atlantic ocean,
up the Mississippi river to Kentucky, before dismantling his ships to
build homes, discovering America centuries before Christopher
Columbus did.
Having
found a new land in which his people could settle and grow, he didn’t
take into account the ancient travel routes of the native Red
Indians, who regularly traveled through Kentucky, and who took
offence at being blocked, by this new arrival from across the great
sea. Ironically after the great battles with King Arthur’s armies
in Kentucky, they avoided the area, going around rather than through,
in respect for the many lives lost on both sides, fearful of the
fields of blood and the spirits which remained in torment. King
Arthur II died sometime in 569AD, assassinated by a native Indian
savage , and has been remembered as Britain’s greatest King ever
since. With Brexit dominating Britain’s politics, isn’t it any
wonder that the British hold an inbred hostility towards Europe, and
an independent spirit of self-rule. King Arthur II was a real
historical figure, and according to Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett,
was a King, from a long line of Kings leading all the way back to the
Holy family themselves. If you thought the news King Arthur was real
amazing enough; simply hold onto your hats, when you hear that
according to Wilson and Blackett’s research; Jesus Christ survived
the crucifixion and came to South Wales for sanctuary, where after he
was known as the Lame Fisher King!
Further Reading
Plantagenet
Royal Family
Artorius
Rex Discovered
HAIL
KING ARTHUR: THE REAL KING OF GREAT BRITAIN (PART 1)
http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/2014/05/hail-king-arthur-real-king-of-great.html
The Dark Ages
Alan
Wilson talks about two King Arthur's
Alan
Wilson and Baram Blackett talk King Arthur
About the Author
I’ve
been writing blogs since 2012, and have gained a controversial
reputation within the Truth Movement, as a maverick. As the editor of
the million hitting Guerrilla Democracy News, I’ve written the
headlines, the journalists from Fleet Street could only dream of
writing. Check out my latest articles at Mr.X Investigations,
reporting the news, mainstream media dare not report, and follow me
on Twitter @GuerrillaDNews,
Facebook on matthew.taylor.148116
and
Youtube channel at UCvmbftYJXF1b8LJRgqGa3FA.
Sunday, 23 June 2019
Subscribe to the :Andrew :Devine Show
CLASSIC DEVINE
SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDY DEVINE SHOW
BETTER THAN TV AND RADIO
Wednesday, 19 June 2019
Sunday, 16 June 2019
INSIDE COURT 16 - A GUERRILLA DEMOCRACY NEWS SPECIAL REPORT
GUERRILLA
DEMOCRACY NEWS SPECIAL REPORT
Who is Mr.X?
“I’m guilty of trying to save my country.”
Confirming to the court that Mr Paterson had reported serious crimes of government and judiciary to himself, and confirming that he is in possession of all the evidence Mr Paterson possessed, DC Grimwood was allowed to leave the witness stand.
Wrapped up by 11.45 am.
Fraud
investigator, Royal Commission Protected Witness and an all-round
Peaceful Warrior, 69 year old Sir John Paterson, was sentenced to 21
days in prison, suspended for 12 months, for being in contempt of
court.
A
packed public gallery heard how in April 2017, John Paterson secretly
recorded a court case at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, on a
small voice recorder.
Even
though all court cases are recorded and available to the public, and
whilst in some circumstances permission can be given to record court
proceedings, Mr Paterson was subjected to 2 years of state sponsored
torture, threatened with jail, and fines, for recording a public
event, for his own educational and personal reasons.
In-side
the Royal Courts of InJustice
Once
Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis kicked off the
proceedings, (with the latter doing all the talking), Citizen John
Paterson addressed the court, stating he has Crown Protection and for
his witness Equity Lawyer, Edward Ellis, to explain further.
Upon
being refused Mr Paterson said,
“It
is my right to do so,” after
which Edward Ellis said to the Judges, “You
have no jurisdiction,” to
which Mr Justice William Davis replied, “Having
heard what I’ve just heard, Mr Ellis, go and sit in the public
gallery.”
Judgement
of Court
Having
endured the stress and strain of having imprisonment, fine or both,
hanging over his head for the last two years, a packed public gallery
heard the Application by the Attorney General for the imprisonment of
Mr Paterson for contempt of court.
With
the verdict hanging in the balance, whispered chat throughout Court
16 was of a suspended sentence.
Who is Mr.X?
Mentioned
in the harassment case of Christoper D Spivey in 2015 (against the
family of the murdered soldier Lee Rigby,) and now again in Mr
Paterson’s contempt case, Mr.X was referred to by name; all further
information is REDACTED.
It
was explained by the Prosecution that at the time of the recording,
it wasn’t noticed, but came to light later when audio of the
REDACTED
CASE
was
uploaded to Youtube.
Having
hid the recording device in the base of a house plant, police
initially missed it when they raided his property in relation to the
REACTED
CASE,
on the 8th May 2017.
Mr
Paterson voluntarily surrendered the listening device which was found
to have 5 recordings of the REDACTED
CASE.
With
good support in the public gallery, loyal friend and supporter Neelu
Berry entered court late; having had herself a busy night, sparing
with the forces of Satan knocking at her door at a quarter to eleven,
protecting ‘Cure for Cancer’ whistle-blower, Lynda Thyer.
State Sponsored Assassination Attempt
Looking
relaxed, at peace and calm, Mr Paterson lent back against the
Queen's bench, as the Prosecution and Judges waffled on for 15
minutes, talking legalese between themselves.
Slowly
and surely a consensus was agreed upon;
- No one was aware of the recording
- Mr Paterson had offered it for transcribing, all offers were declined
- The recording was made for his own personal use
Citing
more evidence against him, via his emails, proving his contempt, the
Judge asked in no uncertain terms, “What
excuse do you have for recording a public event?”
“I
had to because I’m exposing the corrupt judiciary. I do not accept
it’s a contempt of court,”
Mr
Paterson answered.
Going
further, Mr Paterson said
“The
PM and Attorney General have provided protection frauds for organised
crime.”
No
witnesses from the Prosecution
Standing
before the Judges alone and without any legal representation, the
Prosecution called no witnesses, while Mr Paterson was allowed to
cross examine DC Grimwood.
Mr
Grimwood takes the stand
With
the Prosecution asking Mr Grimwood to open a number of bundles of
paper, and to confirm that the Statement of 19 June 2017, was a true
and accurate account of the events, and whether another statement on
24 May 2019, was also his own, the Prosecution wrapped it up and it
was Mr Paterson’s turn to cross examine him.
Mr
Paterson started by asking him to confirm whether he had received
information about serious crimes of State and Judiciary?
Looking
for guidance from Mr Justice William Davis to continue, DC Grimwood
confirmed that he had.
Pressed
by the Judge as to whether there were anymore questions, Mr Paterson
asked why he hadn’t done anything about the serious crimes he had
already reported?
“I’m guilty of trying to save my country.”
- Mr Justice William Davis - “Do you accept that you did record the proceedings?”
- Sir John Paterson - “Yes I did, I had to do it.”
- Mr Justice William Davis - “Do you accept its contempt of court?”
- Sir John Paterson - “No. I’ve had to do it, to bring the fraud to the attention of the public.”
Confirming to the court that Mr Paterson had reported serious crimes of government and judiciary to himself, and confirming that he is in possession of all the evidence Mr Paterson possessed, DC Grimwood was allowed to leave the witness stand.
- 10.37am The Fantastic Four arrive, and pile into the public gallery
- Frank McElheron, David Ellis, Bryn Real and Tony Livingstone.
The
Judges rose to reassess the situation at 10.50am.
Mr
Justice William Davis offers Mr Paterson a choice of taking the
witness stand or to remain seated. Either to give evidence or make
submissions.
(It’s
all legalese to me.)
As
the mis-trial continued unabated, Mr Paterson was denied legal
representation, and was left with no alternative but to defend
himself against the Attorney General, (who was costing the taxpayer
£19K a day)
A
Mistrial and an Injustice of Justice
Mr
Paterson read out the introduction of a prepared statement by Edward
Ellis, declaring he wanted the Equity Lawyer to explain further, but
is unable to.
"This
conduct
does amount to contempt of court,”
sneered
the Prosecution.
With
gasps from the public gallery, the Judges concluded that Mr Paterson
has been proved to be in contempt, and that the respondent knew he
wasn’t allowed to record but went ahead and did so anyway.
The
Judge summed up in disjointed language, “Your
defense of corruption has nothing to point.”
The
Judges have now moved onto working out how long to sentence him.
“This
is a set up, poor guy,”
said
a member from the public gallery.
The
facts established are as follows:
- He voluntarily submitted the listening device to police
- He hasn’t undertaken any recording since
- He’s never published anything online about the REDACTED proceedings
“Here's
hoping for a suspended sentence,”
said
one member in the public gallery to the other, “the
Judges appear to be considerate that John has been a good boy.”
Mr
Paterson’s previous Common Law lawyer and friend, Patrick
Cullinane is mentioned. Mr Paterson’s voiced his fear that what
happened to Patrick will happen to him.
“I
don’t think he’s going down, but will be given a suspended
sentence. I really hope so,”
said
one reporter to the other.
Whispering
between themselves like sly bullies at school, conspiring to cause
harm, loss and injury to the unfortunate souls they’ve chosen to
pick on, both Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis moved
onto discussing case studies, to determine how much time they can
legally sentence him to.
Citing
Mr Scarf, a 78-year-old pensioner, who received 28 days suspended for
2 years, for continually committing contempt of court, and Mr
Cullinane, (Mr Paterson’s Common Law Lawyer) for his alleged
crimes of contempt, both Judges were scratching around the bottom of
the barrel, to find the case law allowing them to enforce a
custodial sentence.
With
nothing against Mr Paterson’s character and good standing, the
Prosecution reverted to type and raised Mr Paterson’s previous
offence of obstructing a police officer.
With
a visible softening of the Judges, the packed gallery prayed for a
suspended sentence, and muttering threats of revolution if it wasn’t
given.
It
was acknowledged by the Prosecution of the real concern of living in
a world where it’s hard to enforce this law, with the technology of
listening devices, getting smaller and smaller.
“This
is a matter of importance for the public issue,”
declared
Mr Justice William Davis, climbing upon his moral high-ground, built
upon the crimes of generations of his predecessors, “Now
Mr Paterson, we have to decide what to do with you.”
Invited
to give his response to the litany of lies, twisted-truths and
allegations, leveled against his good character for the last 10
minutes, John was quick to explain what happened when the police
assaulted him at Seaford.
To
paraphrase;
“I
was standing with my friend waiting to collect my car after it’s
MOT. A police officer comes up to me and says he wants to search me
because I’m being suspicious. He pushed me and assaulted my
friend.”
During
a passionate defense of himself on the day in question, Mr Paterson
came coming across as a mild mannered gentlemen, unfairly treated by
the state, convinced he is fighting a corrupt government and
judiciary.
“That’s
when my story began.”
One
reporter was heard saying to another, “John
is giving an impassioned speech before the judge.”
Talking
about REDACTED
CASE.
Now
Mr Paterson is giving it to the Judges with both barrels, talking
about Patrick Cullinane, “In
a court of law there is no justice, because even if you are innocent
you are found guilty.”
With
mentions of Gordon Bowden and Brian Setchfield, referencing the
criminal frauds of the Finchley Road Boiler Room, and the police
crimes of Bohemia Police station in Hastings; Mr Justice William
Davis was keen to rein Mr Paterson in.
“I
do understand you have these concerns,”
he
said interrupting Mr Paterson’s tirade, to which Paterson replied
in astonishment, “Concerns.”
Mutterings
from the Public Gallery growing louder and louder.
“Is
there anything you want to add, that makes what you did less
serious,” asks
Mr Justice William Davies.
“Well
I would have loved to bring in more witnesses, but the last time I
tried to bring in a witness, they stopped me.”
“I'll
glad I’m here to explain myself to the public,”
declares
Mr Paterson, before stating for the purposes of the Court’s tape
- “David Joe Neilson is too scared to return to his home, because he fears he'll be killed by Sussex police.”
- “Institutions have been infiltrated by organised crime.”
To
which Mr Lord Justice William Davies, replied in defiance,
“That’s
for another day,”
before
standing up and declaring a recess.
John
Paterson is Smashing It.
Back
in Court 16 at 11.25, Mr Justice William Davies declared with puffed
chest and venom on his voice, “we
are here to sentence John Paterson for contempt of court.”
“It’s
been proved.”
The
Attorney General gave these aggravating and mitigating features;
- Previously recorded at another case
- Length of the recordings, over several hours
- Not significant but a recording of a sensitive case
- The nature of the proceedings that the recordings dealt with, could have aggregated matters
- The response to previous convictions of obstructing a police officer
- Mr Paterson has cooperated with the police operation fully
- He promised not to do it again, and he hasn’t for the last 2 years, honouring his statement
- Used the recording for his own personal needs, and hasn’t disseminated it further
- Mr Paterson is 67, (corrected to 69 by Mr Paterson)
- Mr Paterson is of good character
- Length of time the case has taken to come to court
- Mr Cullinane and Mr Scarf were given as case studies; on both occasions, the sentence was found to be excessive on appeal
Mr
Justice William Davies reiterates, “Recording
without permission is a serious matter, and the law must be fully
complied with.”
and
then adds, “In
appropriate circumstances, the proceedings can be allowed to be
recorded. What is not permissible is allowing the public to take
action into their own hands.”
This
is a sentence which is the basis of why Mr Paterson finds himself
facing imprisonment.
Let’s
put it into perspective; Over 2 years earlier, Mr Paterson recorded
the audio of a case, which was being recorded anyway, and made
available to the public, and that in ‘appropriate circumstances’
the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded.
The
Judge made it perfectly clear why Mr Paterson is in the dock.
“What
is not permissible is allowing the public take actions In their
hands.”
"The
Sentence is to imprison you for 21 days, suspended for 12 months. Do
you understand Mr Paterson. Keep out of trouble for 12 months and
that will be the end of it.”
Paterson
immediately asked permission to appeal, to which was instantly
refused.
“It’s
the discretion of the court,”
screamed
the Judge over the hissing from the public gallery.
Prolonging
the agony, the Attorney General caught the Judges attention to
hight-light two auxiliary matters.
“Forfeiture
of the recording device and destruction of it.”
“I
don’t think its lawful to destroy evidence in relation to my case,”
replied
Mr Paterson in response to the application of the destruction of
recording device.
“Charlotte
Wright from the BBC should be held in contempt too,”
said
Mr Paterson, complaining that she also recorded the same court case,
but was allowed to do so, because she was from the BBC.
After
a few moments of hushed whisper, the Judge’s decree that the micro
SD card will be destroyed, but not the actual recording device.
“If
you destroy that, you are destroying evidence,”
decried Mr Paterson, to which the Judge reiterated, “I
order the SD card destroyed.”
“Ordered
SD card destroyed.” - ‘Too sensitive of nature to be released to
the public.’
While
the Judge’s crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s, Mr Paterson
spent the free time, (and for the purposes of the tape) to again
speak about the 788-790 Finchley Road boiler room fraud.
- Costs claimed at £19,944.89
Wrapped up by 11.45 am.
As
the proceedings wrapped up and the public gallery emptied, the
Fantastic Four (Frank, David, Bryn and Tony) flew the International
Tribes flag for the first time in a British Court of law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)