Saturday, 24 December 2016

Christmas is a Time of Mischief.

Guerrilla Democracy News loses all credibility due to misinformation attacks.


With Christmas generally accepted as the most rowdiest time of the year, when even Church and State endorse a licence to misbehave and lie to the kids; to act in a way you couldn't get away with the rest of the year; it isn't surprising that Guerrilla Democracy News should find itself victims of Christmas 'Misinformation' Mischief.







Taking information at face value and accepting no responsibility over the information received, (due to time and resource restraints) I am unable to verify with third parties the news I publish.















Dogman denies posting the comment below.
























Which then invalids, the comment below, believed to be from Danielle La Verite.









Of-course my suspicions were confirmed after getting a message from Stacey Spivey (Chris Spivey's daughter) offering me a BJ for £3.









By then it was too late. I had released the news and it was being shared across Facebook.
I was left with no other choice but to publish a 'Disclaimer,' justifying publishing 'Fake News'.

DISCLAIMER

Guerrilla Democracy News processes news hot of the press. Due to the lack of resources news cannot always be verified through third parties, confirming the authenticity of the information.
All news is processed at face value.
Guerrilla Democracy News has published 'Fake News,' but has never done so intentionally.
For example:








Guerrilla Democracy News accepts no responsible for 'mis-information agents' assuming on-line identities of others, to deceive Guerrilla Democracy News, it's readers and supporters.













Since then the Christmas Mischief has become Ridiculous.


























Thank you for reading... and please share...

c0227-guerrilla-democracy-news-part123

available now from lulu.com

fc683-guerrilla-democracy-view

Wednesday, 14 December 2016

Alun Palmer - Exposed as a McCann sponsored Troll.


Read more:

Alun Palmer - The Sickness at the Heart of the British Press



Chris Spivey found not guilty of possessing child pornography

Controversial writer Chris Spivey has been found not guilty on all counts of possessing child pornography, distributing child pornography and possessing extreme pornography.


Chris Spivey, 52 from Rochford in Essex has endured two years of rumour and speculation, after his trial started at Basildon Crown Court for possession of 70 images of child pornography and bestiality.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the British Justice System, Castle Point Council Social Services Department and Essex Police, all face serious questions after the case was thrown out of court, after it was revealed that all the images were sourced from a Google search and are all perfectly legal.

Legally owned by Sir Elton John


Having wasted millions of pounds of tax payers money bringing the case against Spivey, the charges were dropped after it was revealed the images had once been on display at London’s Tate Modern as part of a set of iconic images from the 1920s and 1950s. In fact a Nan Goldin’s photograph, titled 'Klara and Edda Belly Dancing', is a legal image owned by Sir Elton John, of which the Essex Police backed by the CPS decided was a Class C indecent image of a child.

A leading writer in the Alternative Media, Spivey intends to sue the CPS, the Essex Police force and the Essex Chief Constable Stephen Kavanagh, for false arrest and imprisonment.

He said in defiance, “Indeed, these Minions believe that they are above the law whilst grossly underestimating my patience, bottle and tenacity.”

Found guilty of harassing the family of murdered soldier Lee Rigby in 2015, claiming his murder was a hoax to ignite hatred against Islam, his appeal against the harassment charge is finally going ahead on the 17th of January 2017, two and a half years after he was illegally arrested and his property illegally taken by the Essex Police force.

Malicious Prosecution


Arrested in a 2am raid on the 30th of July 2014, during which the police battered down his front door, kicking down his garden gate and smashing his bedroom window, all the while his 18 year old daughter and 1 year old grandson were in the house, Spivey claims images of child pornography and bestiality were planted on his computer by Essex police, after his computer was illegally seized by the police in an illegal search and arrest.

Princess Diana was a fictional character



Cleared of all charges, conspiracy researcher Spivey continues to court controversy by publishing ground-breaking articles in which he claims Princess Diana was a fictional character made up by MI5 and that royalty, celebrities and politicians, play numerous other personalities, with the help of prosthetics backed up by photo-shopped photographs.

Following the news that all charges have been dropped Spivey said, “Indeed, there is no celebration to be had from being found not guilty for something that I have not done. Especially as the charges relate to a crime that is one of the most abhorrent an innocent man can find himself charged with.”

 







FURTHER READING



Monday, 12 December 2016

Alun Palmer - The Sickness at the Heart of the British Press.

Poisonous Palmer

Freelance journalist to the Fleet Street's newspapers Alum Palmer, illustrates perfectly the sickness that lays at the heart of the British Press, having posted a vile and disturbing rebuke to my question as to why the mainstream British press isn't reporting the news that a respected statement analyst in the US, has concluded the McCanns are lying about their daughter Madeleine.


He wrote: “Please fuck off and get cancer you click bait cunt.”


In response to my question:

"Dear Journalists; Please excuse me but I don't understand why the mainstream press isn't reporting this breaking news, that a statement analyst from the US, has concluded the McCann's are lying about the disappearance of their daughter. Shouldn't this be splashed across the front page news? I'm really confused. I'm not a journalist but I seem to be having to write the stories which professional journalists are either told not to or aren't interested in. Will you please take a look at the link and I would greatly value your feedback. http://uk.blastingnews.com/opinion/2016/11/madeleine-mccann-is-dead-says-expert-001261943.html"


I like to think I'm polite and that I wrote a polite question; it appears Palmer is rather polite too.

He continues:

"Apologies for the intemperate message that I sent that appears as if it was directed at you. It wasn't. It was directed at the man who spammed us all accusing us of ignoring an article he had written on Madeline McCann. Reading it, it was such a dreadful pack of lies I looked a little closer. It was posted on the Breaking News, a site where anything can be published as long as it promotes clicks. You get between £8 and £12 per 1000 people who click on your link so the more incendiary your article the more clicks you get. I find it morally disgusting that you can write such awful, dehumanising lies just to get a few clicks and earn a few quid. As journalists, we are the last bastion in this post truth world. And for that, I will get a bit sweary."


Palmer & Bon Jovi
Palmer & David Bowie
Palmer & Carol Vorderman
Palmer & Charlie Watts
Let's break it down shall we; to illustrate perfectly the sickness at the heart of the British press.

First and foremost I'm did not spam anyone; I asked a legitimate question. The recognised definition of spam is irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to large numbers of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc.

The question which I sent to about 20 journalist on LinkedIn was relevant and was asked with sincere intentions.

"Please excuse me but I don't understand why the mainstream press isn't reporting this breaking news, that a statement analyst from the US, has concluded the McCann's are lying about the disappearance of their daughter."

As any right minded reader can tell, I wasn't accusing anyone of “ignoring” my article I wrote, but rather, why isn't the main stream press are reporting the news published by Richard D Hall? I receive my news in the same manner as anyone else and its ludicrous to think professional journalists would miss this news about Madeleine.

Pathetic Palmer calls the article a "dreadful pack of lies."

But where are the lies? A US based statement analyst, Peter Hyatt, who is respected within the world of forensic investigation, used by law enforcement agencies including the FBI, and who trains police officers in statement analyst, put his reputation on the line by stating that he believed both Gerry and Kate McCann are lying about their daughter's disappearance.

UK Blasting News

To further spread his sickness, other than wishing me to “Fuck off and get Cancer,” he lambasts UK Blasting News calling me “morally disgusting” for writing “such awful, dehumanising lies just to get a few clicks and earn a few quid.”

Let's get one thing straight, I did not post the article to get a few clicks and earn a few quid.

As he rightly points out, you do get between £8 and £12 per 1000 clicks.

So far the Madeleine McCann article has earned me £8.86. I trust you will appreciate that I'm certainly not doing it to earn a few quid.



I've posted 15 articles on UK Blasting News since February 2016. The biggest pay out was £111.37 for an article I wrote about Theresa May, a sizeable amount not to be scoffed at.




Working out at £15.39 a month, I can confidently say that I'm not posting these articles to earn a living. I have a day job and post these articles because the mainstream news aren't reporting the news I want to read.

As I wrote in my original message,  “I'm not a journalist but I seem to be having to write the stories which professional journalists are either told not to or aren't interested in.”

I use the UK Blasting News platform because I can reach a wider audience than my own blog platforms. The fact I can earn a few quid is a bonus but not the over-riding incentive to do so. I suppose like all creative people, we want our works seen by as many people as possible, and I'm no different.

I make no secret that I'm an amateur journalist... (Please see public apology) But to wish I get Cancer for writing an article reporting the facts of a situation, perfectly illustrates the sickness at the heart of the British press.

"I will get a bit sweary."

Pious Palmer self-rightly puts himself on his own pedestal by saying, “As journalists, we are the last bastion in this post truth world. And for that, I will get a bit sweary.”

Really!

We are the last bastion in this post truth world.”

Poisonous Palmer couldn't recognise the truth even if it came up and smashed his teeth out.

Post Truth World,” what the fuck is he on about?

I asked a straight forward question and in response I get told to “Please fuck off and get cancer you click bait cunt.”

Is this really becoming of a freelance journalist who contributes to all the Fleet Street newspapers? 

Lets get one thing clear; UK Blasting News employs a strict vetting process to ensures fake news isn't published on their website. The article I wrote about the embedded confession from Gerry and Kate McCann is based on facts and truth. Documentary maker Richard D Hall really did travel to the state of Maine in America and interviewed respected statement analyst Peter Hyatt.

Peter Hyatt really did stake his reputation on the conclusion that Gerry and Kate McCann are lying about the disappearance of their daughter.

Puppet Palmer is a vile and disgusting individual who cannot handle the truth. Telling me to “Fuck off” is one thing, but to wish I “get Cancer” is another. I'm a father to two beautiful children and unlike Gerry and Kate McCann, would never leave them alone when we go on holiday.

Its a statement which will stay with me forever and which has enraged my wrath to the extent of writing this blog and splashing it across the internet.

Fuck you Alun Palmer! And may you live happily ever after!




Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Madeleine McCann is Dead.

Gerry and Kate McCann find themselves under the spotlight of guilt, following the release of Richard D Hall's latest documentary "McCann's Embedded Confessions," in which he interviews renowned statement analyst Peter Hyatt, who in his professional opinion, concludes the McCann's have lied about their daughter's disappearance.







US based Hyatt analysed a 2011 interview, which the McCann's gave an Australian network in which an embedded confession reveals Madeleine accidentally died from a fall, that the McCann's hid her body and that the possibility of sexual child-abuse must “be further explored.”

Having enjoyed an easy ride by British police and a compassionate UK Press, the McCann's must now be fearing the worse with the release of this latest and most damaging documentary yet.

She fell and died

During the interview the Australian host asked Gerry, "Did you kill your daughter?" to which Gerry replied, "No, that's an emphatic no. Why would we cover that up?"

To which Hyatt replied, "The answer is very simple. We are professional people, with two other children, unintentional death, you are going to lose custody of your children."

Hyatt explains further, “When a guilty person asks questions, they're floating out alibis. Looking to see what sounds plausible. Will it be ridiculed, be accepted, would it sound sane, would it help get them off the hook.”



Portuguese Police Know

Having refused to answer 48 questions by Portuguese detectives and never questioned by British police, the McCann's are waking up to the reality that a highly respected and professional statement analyst, (who teaches other professionals and who assists law enforcement on criminal cases), has staked his career and reputation on the conclusion that the McCann's covered up the accidental death of their daughter.

Hyatt said, "If you asked me, as a matter of public record your conclusion that the McCann's are showing guilty knowledge in the death of Madeleine, how sure are you of that, I am able to answer that knowing that my career is looked at, and say, I'm certain."

“I'm certain”

UFO researcher Richard D Hall has courted controversy with the McCann's before, having braved the threat of libel action with his previous documentary 'The True Story of Madeleine McCann. Buried by Mainstream Media;" which concentrated on the FBI sniffer dogs who alerted their handler to the presence of a cadaver in  the front room, in a cupboard and the boot of their hire car. The findings of the sniffer dogs collaborate Hyatt's conclusion that Madeleine died in the flat.

Promoting his 2017 UK wide tour, Hall once had his own TV show, but was taken off the air-waves by Ofcom, following a complaint about its content. Hall has explored many areas of contention including the 7/7 terror attacks, the Didcot murders, the cover-up of ancient British history, animal mutilations, crop circles, free energy and the 9/11 Twin Tower's collapse.



“Ludicrous”

Many famous and prominent people now find themselves in the uncomfortable position of supporting a couple, who are alleged to have maliciously covered up the accidental death of their daughter.

Amongst many celebrities and politicians, David Beckham made a televised appeal for her safe return, Richard Branson donated £100,000 to kick start a legal fund to clear the McCann's of being suspects in her disappearance, Prince Charles is on record supporting the McCann's and Pope Benedict even gave them his Papal Blessing.

It's only a matter of time before the McCann's face justice and Madeleine can finally rest in peace.




Please show your appreciation with a donation.