James Hind the Tiresome Satanic Pest/Paedo Scum...

The constant, obsessed, fixated, relentless and merciless sniping of James Hind can become so tiresome, so quickly.

For some context before I carry on, I am reactionary on YouTube. I react to what is said about me, and am only proactive in promoting subjects which don't alarm, distress or harm other users. Namely the promotion of King Arthur II and Guerrilla Democracy News.

It's with this is mind, that I find myself, once again, having to react to the slander and misinformation being put out by the Satanic pest on a daily basis.

Here is his latest, released at approximately 06:01am today.

Firstly I am not a predator and take offence to being called one.

A predator is an animal that preys on other creatures for meat, to survive. Typically, a predator is a member of a higher trophic level in the food chain, who eats the animals from the levels beneath it. Predators have specialized characteristics, such as teeth and claws, that make them effective hunters.

In a recent tweet he said he'll start using the term "Predators," to refer to "QAnon extremists," having previously used the term"Satan Hunters."

It reminds me of a 2 year old, let loose on a computer with a dictionary.

Mind you, I'm not much better, because in response I've stopped calling him a "Project Paedo Watch Extremist", and started using the terms "Satanic Pest," and "Paedo Scum" instead.

But I've been distracted, back to the point!

The Satanic Pest, and Paedo Scum James Hind continues to peddle the myth that I was found with child sexual abuse images in my possession. This is a false statement and misinformation.

Whatever Surrey Police claimed they found, evidently turned out not to be.

Let's get this straight for the final time.

It was alleged that a Category C picture was found in my possession, on a disc, alongside a Simpson style cartoon picture depicting an orgy.

I was charged with making and possessing child pornography.

I endured three years of the case going through the court system.

On at least three occasions I turned up at court, believing I would be attending a trial during which 12 of my peers would determine, (based on the evidence,) whether I was guilty or not.

Guilty of the worst crime any man, or father, could ever be accused of.

On each occasion I was representing myself, without any legal representation.

After three years of kicking the can down the road, the Judge asked whether I wanted legal representation, to which I finally conceded, and said yes.

Once a third party looked at the evidence Surrey Police were presenting, their case fell apart, and it was thrown out of court, based on the lack of evidence.

Thus the facts of the case remain, no evidence was presented in court proving I was in possession of a single Category C picture.

I have never seen the pictures which I have been alleged to have had in my possession.

It was and always has been an allegation made by Surrey Police which has never been proven in a Court of Law.

So, when the Stanic Pest/Paedo Scum James Hind makes a public statement such as, "child sexual abuse images in his possession," is a clear lie, and a pathetic attempt at discrediting me, souring my reputation and twisting the narrative.

Which leads me onto the next point of contention.

Being accused of "stalking his Twitter account with multiple troll accounts."

It remined when the Editor of Brighton and Hove News Jo Wadsworth, tweeted something, to which the Satanic pest immediately jumped in implying it was me.

For the record, no! It wasn't me, and it's not me now!

What James Hind, the Satanic pest and paedo scum needs to realise, is that there are alot of people out to expose him.

Which brings me onto the last point of contention.

"Matthew Taylor who is also a convicted stalker of women."

Again, this is another factually incorrect statement, in the same vein as claiming child abuse images were found in my possession.

I have no convictions for stalking women. Fact!

A newspaper article may claim I was charged for stalking, but again, that is factually incorrect, and a mistake made by the journalist.

Other mistakes by journalists include I received a four year sentence for harassment, when it was four months, and another one was stating that I was charged for claiming a particular individual was a "satanic cult leader," when the court documents showed I said an "alleged satanic cult leader."

This proves that James Hind, (the Satanic pest and Paedo Scum, who claims to live in Brighton), is nothing more than a deluded fantasist.

All he can do is to lie, lie and lie some more.

James Hind Protects Paedophiles.

James Hind won't help anyone expose real paedophiles.

He only targets people who he knows for a fact who aren't paedophiles.

"We deal with a specific type of predator so would not be able to help in more general predator cases."

James Hind will do nothing to ruin the life of a real paedophile, because he doesn't like that on his mind; but will do anything in his power to ruin the life of an innocent man.

You have to ask yourself, why is James Hind obsessed with paedophilia?

The answer is staring you in the face, when you see the imagery he publishes.

Ditto!

The Satanic Predator James Hind who claims to be from Brighton, is a paedophile in my opinion: dangerous, because he is unable to admit he has a problem and take responsibility for addressing his sexual interest in children, and paedophilia in general. Hind poses a seriously high child protection risk to the safety of children, teenagers and adults alike.

Read more:

Ten Reasons why I believe James Hind is a paedophile...

Nobody knows exactly what James Hind says or shares with children, while pretending to be a 12 year old boy online.

It's all a big film for James Hind.

The Prevention and Investigation of Crime by Satanist James Hind.

AI depiction of Satanic Predator James Hind

Its all a big film for James Hind.

Suffering from Depersonalisation and Derealisation, James Hind abuses people as if he's watching it on a film.

He would say it to himself, as he gleefully abuses teenage boys and adults alike.

"It's not me who's doing it, it's him over there. He's got nothing to do with me. I'm innocent. How could it be me, when I'm here and he's over there, and i'm watching it on TV?"

James Hind feels entitled to monitor every aspect of my life. Being the moral compass to which I must lead my existence.

He's stuck himself to me like a tattoo.

I can't get rid of the satanic pest and paedophile scumbag.

The man has destroyed my life, well being and mental health, and continues to do so with every passing day.

I am a shadow of my former self, having been his constant victim since August 2021, after tweeting he will be keeping a close eye on me.

I was arrested on 04 October 2023, after being set up him and Plisko.

Plisko spamming a certain name onto my computer screen, while screen sharing during a YouTube live, of which James Hind recorded for prosperity, and passed onto Sussex Police, claiming I intentionally broke a certain court order, which prevents me from mentioning a certain name.

James Hind has destroyed my mental health, and continues to tread on it on a daily basis.

I can't even do a friend a favour in Algeria, who asked me to publicise his orphanage, without James Hind twisting the narrative and reporting me for it.

It can be argued that he's been responsible for orchestrating all my arrests since I first appeared on YouTube.

Having offered £300 to any member of the public to start legal proceedings against me. Having offered to underwrite payments to Shellie Mote to start legal proceedings against me, and having encouraged Paris Barrington to start legal proceedings against me, I can state with confidence that he enticed three teenage boys to make a malicious allegation against me, as he did so to Jamie Lofthouse, and most recently working with the YouTube porn bomber, Plisko, to set me up.

Of course he'll deny it.

He's mentally ill and suffers from Depersonalisation and Derealisation.

"That wasn't me, that was him. I watched him do it as if I was watching a film of him doing it."

James Hind complaining of the Mental impact of me responding to his bullshit, constant stalking and merciless harassment.

It's reminds me of the generic response I get from Sussex Police whenever I report crimes committed against myself.

“In some of your own productions on You Tube, you have made comments that are less than tasteful and one could argue that you have in some way courted controversy by making some of the statements / comments that you have in the past. It cannot be fair or reasonable on your part to then get upset and report matters to Police because the shoe now appears to be on the other foot”.

You only need to look at his most recent tweet, with reference to me.

Projection appears to be Hind's middle name. The only "serial allegation maker" around here is himself.

But of course he doesn't see that does he. Its not he who is many the allegations, its him over there, the person on TV!

After all, I'm a father and he's accused me of being a paedophile.

As I mentioned on a previous blog, and to which I can only assume he's referring to, taking into consideration the vagueness and ambiguity of his statements, I have never been accused of raping my own children.

I'm highlighting the factual reality of children accusing their fathers of serious sexual assault, and used two examples of which are in the public domain of children accusing their fathers of rape, as with the ex husband of Samantha Baldwin and the child in the Wilfred Wong kidnap case.

Contrary to how James Hind twists my words, I'm not accusing those fathers of those crimes, their own children did.

I raised these facts to illustrate that there are no child protection issues relating to me, except those in the mentally ill mind of James Hind.

My children have never accused me of all sexual impropriety towards them, and they certainly have never accused me of raping them.

But still, James Hind will continue to spew spiteful and harmful lies about me into the public domain, that I am a paedophile and a danger to children.

But to him, I am the one making the allegations against innocent fathers!

James Hind needs to look in the mirror and see himself and understand that he himself is ruining people's lives, not that character he thinks he's watching on TV.

Suffering from Depersonalisation and Derealisation he is able to distance himself from his own actions and in doing so absolve himself of all responsibility and capability.

I understand that he is mentally ill and unstable, but that doesn't lessen the terrible impact his stalking and harassment has on my life and the life of my friends, family and lived ones.

Which makes it all the more unsavoury of him to ask requests of me, while inflicting such alarm, distress and fear onto my mental health and well being.

Yesterday (31 January 2024,) I received a YouTube message imply James Hind's real name is Simon Just.

To which he was quick to refute, and to actually say, "we would appreciate that you do not post about false information linking anyone to Project Night Watch or our associates without proper evidence."

Again, you must read this message within the context of his mental illness of Depersonalisation and Derealisation.

Closely intertwined with the mental illness of Dissociative Identity Disorder (D.I.D), the mention of the plural "we," indicates that not only does he view his own actions as if watching a film, he also sees his split personalities as living and breathing human beings.

While he doesn't "appreciate," "false information," being spread about him, he feels perfectly entitled to spread "false misinformation" about me

AI depiction of James Hind

AI depiction of one of his split personalities

AI depiction of the 12 year old boy James Hind pretends to be while sharing very disturbing illegal content of the top level with other children as young as 11 years old

AI depiction of another one of his personalities

Tweets published from 28 December 2023, to Present Day, which mention me.

Disclaimer: The content portrayed within this blog is a commentary and critique of a public individual, and is presented within the legal framework of fair usage, personal expression and the prevention, detection and investigation of crime. It should in no way be interpreted as incitement or encouragement of any act of violence or other criminal conduct, and is meant for purposes of discussion only. Viewer discretion is advised, and all content is intended for mature audiences.