The Nightmare of False Accusations.

Coping with the Horror and Trauma of Being Wrongly Accused of Paedophilia.

Being falsely accused of being a paedophile is a harrowing experience that can shatter lives, reputations, and relationships. 

The mere accusation carries a stigma that is difficult to shake, leading to profound psychological trauma and social ostracism. 

Join me as I delve into the horror and trauma faced by individuals who find themselves unjustly accused of such a heinous crime.

The Horror of False Accusations:

The accusation of paedophilia is one of the most damaging allegations one can face in society. It evokes strong emotions of disgust, fear, and revulsion, often leading to immediate condemnation and isolation. 

The mere suggestion of such a crime can trigger a visceral reaction in people, causing them to distance themselves from the accused individual. 

This sudden loss of social support can be devastating, leaving the accused feeling abandoned and alone in their struggle to prove their innocence.

Moreover, false accusations of paedophilia can result in legal repercussions that are equally traumatic. 

Being subjected to investigations, interrogations, and court proceedings can be emotionally draining and financially crippling. 

The burden of proving one's innocence in the face of such serious allegations can feel insurmountable, especially when the presumption of guilt weighs heavily against the accused.

The Trauma of Stigma and Ostracism:

Beyond the legal implications, the psychological impact of being falsely accused of paedophilia is profound. 

The stigma attached to such accusations can lead to severe mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. 

The constant fear of being labelled as a predator can erode one's sense of self-worth and identity, causing long-lasting emotional scars.

Furthermore, the social ostracism that often accompanies false accusations can compound the trauma experienced by the accused. 

Friends may turn away, colleagues may distance themselves, and even family members may struggle to support someone facing such serious allegations. 

The isolation and alienation that result from being branded as a paedophile can deepen feelings of shame, guilt, and hopelessness.

Coping Strategies and Support:

In the face of such overwhelming horror and trauma, it is crucial for individuals falsely accused of paedophilia to seek out support and resources to help them navigate this challenging ordeal. Counselling and therapy can provide a safe space to process emotions, address trauma, and develop coping strategies for managing the psychological impact of false accusations.

Legal assistance is also essential in defending against baseless allegations and safeguarding one's rights throughout the legal process. 

Working with experienced lawyers who specialise in defending against false accusations can help ensure a fair trial and protect one's reputation from irreparable damage.

Additionally, building a strong support network of trusted friends, family members, or support groups can provide much-needed emotional support during this difficult time. 

Surrounding oneself with understanding individuals who believe in one's innocence can help counteract the isolation and stigma that often accompany false accusations.

Conclusion:

Being falsely accused of paedophilia is a nightmare scenario that no one should have to endure. 

The horror and trauma experienced by individuals facing such baseless allegations are profound and far-reaching. It is essential for society to recognize the devastating impact of false accusations and work towards creating a more just and compassionate system that protects the innocent from unwarranted harm.

By shedding light on the psychological toll of false accusations of paedophilia and advocating for greater support for those who find themselves unjustly targeted, we can begin to address this pervasive issue with empathy, understanding, and resilience. 

Together, we can strive to create a more just society where innocence is presumed until proven otherwise, and where those falsely accused are given the opportunity to reclaim their lives and rebuild their shattered reputations.

The Boys in the Woods Hoax

The Boys in the Woods hoax sheds light on the complexities of abuse allegations, especially those involving children. This case involved three teenage boys falsely accusing a father of inappropriate acts after being exposed to disturbing content. The lack of evidence following a thorough investigation by Sussex Police highlighted the dangers of false accusations influenced by external factors like satanic extremism.

Instances like the Boys in the Woods hoax and historical events such as the Elite Parliamentary Paedophile Rings underscore the need for scepticism and rigorous scrutiny when evaluating abuse claims. The manipulation of individuals, like in this case where a well-known satanist allegedly coerced false accusations, emphasises the importance of critically assessing allegations before drawing conclusions.

While it is crucial to take all abuse allegations seriously, these events serve as reminders that not all statements, especially from children, should be accepted at face value. They emphasise the necessity of thorough investigation and critical analysis to distinguish between genuine claims and falsehoods.

The Emotional and Psychological Impact of False and Malicious Allegations

It is difficult to overstate the emotional and psychological impact that a false and malicious allegation can have on someone's life, especially if it is made to the police and prevents them from visiting a whole county in the UK. Such an allegation can be soul-destroying and can lead to feelings of helplessness, anger, frustration, and even depression.

The stigma associated with being accused of a crime can be devastating, particularly when the allegation is based on false information. Being labeled as an evil monster who must be locked up in prison immediately can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and despair. It can also cause other people to treat you with suspicion and fear, leading to a sense of social exclusion and ostracism.

The impact of a false allegation can extend beyond personal relationships and social interactions. It can also affect a person's professional life and career prospects. Employers may be hesitant to hire someone who has been accused of a crime, regardless of whether the accusation is true or false. This can lead to financial difficulties and further exacerbate the psychological toll of the allegation.

The legal process itself can also be extremely stressful and traumatic for the person who has been accused. They may have to endure a lengthy and costly legal battle to clear their name, even if the evidence against them is weak or nonexistent. The experience of being questioned, investigated, and potentially prosecuted can be deeply unsettling and can leave lasting emotional scars.

In summary, being the target of a false and malicious allegation can be an incredibly traumatic experience that can have a profound impact on a person's life. It can damage personal relationships, undermine professional prospects, and cause immense psychological distress. It is essential that allegations are thoroughly investigated and that people are not unfairly stigmatized or punished based on false information.

It is understandable that anyone may feel frustrated or upset if someone is expressing fear or discomfort around them without any clear justification. It is important to remember, however, that people's perceptions and feelings are not always based on rational or objective criteria.

Fear and discomfort can be influenced by a variety of factors, including past experiences, cultural or social conditioning, and personal biases or prejudices. It is possible that someone may be expressing fear or discomfort around you based on factors that are unrelated to your actual behaviour or history.

That being said, it is important to take people's feelings seriously and to try to understand where they are coming from. Even if you believe that their fear is unfounded, it is important to be respectful and empathetic towards their perspective. It may be helpful to have an open and honest conversation with them to address their concerns and try to find a way to move forward.

In the end, it is not productive to dismiss or invalidate someone's feelings, even if you believe that they are based on inaccurate information. Instead, it is important to approach the situation with an open mind and a willingness to listen and understand.

German Official Leaks Report Denouncing Corona as ‘A Global False Alarm’

Written by Daniele Pozzati dated May 29,2020

Germany’s federal government and mainstream media are engaged in damage control after a report that challenges the established Corona narrative leaked from the interior ministry.

Some of the report key passages are:

• The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.
• The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).
• Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18.
• The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
• A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.

So far, so bad. But it gets worse.

The report focuses on the “manifold and heavy consequences of the Corona measures” and warns that these are “grave”.

More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus.

The reason is a scandal in the making:

A Corona-focused German healthcare system is postponing life-saving surgery and delaying or reducing treatment for non-Corona patients.

Berlin in Denial Mode. The scientists fight back.

Initially, the government tried to dismiss the report as “the work of one employee”, and its contents as “his own opinion” – while the journalists closed ranks, no questions asked, with the politicians.

But the 93-pages report titled “Analysis of the Crisis Management” has been drafted by a scientific panel appointed by the interior ministry and composed by external medical experts from several German universities.

The report was the initiative of a department of the interior ministry called Unit KM4 and in charge with the “Protection of critical infrastructures”.

This is also where the German official turned whistleblower, Stephen Kohn, work(ed), and from where he leaked it to the media.

The authors of the report issued a joint press release already on Mai 11th, berating the government for ignoring expert advise, and asking for the interior minister to officially comment upon the experts joint statement:

“Therapeutic and preventive measures should never bring more harm than the illness itself. Their aim should be to protect the risk groups, without endegearing the availibilty of medical care and the health of the whole population, as it is unfortunately occurring”

“We in the scientific and medical praxis are experiencing the secondary damages of the Corona-measures on our patients on a dialy basis.”

“We therefore ask the Federal Ministry of the Interior, to comment upon our press release, and we hope for a pertinent discussion regarding the [Corona] measures, one that leads to the best possible solution for the whole population”

At the time of writing, the German government had yet to react.

But the facts are – sadly – vindicating the medical experts’ worries.

On Mai 23 the German newspaper Das Bild titled: “Dramatic consequences of the Corona-Measures: 52,000 Cancer Ops delayed.”

Inside, a aeading medical doctor warns that “we will feel the side-effects of the Corona crisis for years”.

Shooting the Whistleblower. Ignoring the Message.

As Der Spiegel reported on Mai 15th: “Stephen Kohn [the whistleblower] has since been suspended from duty. He was advised to obtain a lawyer and his work laptop was confiscated.”

Kohn had originally leaked the report on May 9th to the liberal-conservative magazine Tichys Einblick one of Germany’s most popular alternative media outlets.

News of the report went mainstream in Germany during the second week of Mai – but already in the third week media and politicians alike stopped discussing the issue by refusing to comment upon it.

Emblematic was the approach taken by Günter Krings, the representative for Interior Minister Horst Seehofer – the whistleblower’s boss:

Asked it he would treat the document seriously, Krings replied:

“If you start analyzing papers like that, then pretty soon you’ll be inviting the guys with the tin foil hats to parliamentary hearings.”

Men in tin foil hats – Aluhut in German – is a term used to describe people who believe in conspiracy theories.

Indeed one article by Der Spiegel adressing the Corona protest movement and the consequences of the leaked report contained the word “conspiracy” no fewer than 17 times!

And no discussions of the issues raised by the report itself.

Outside Germany the news has virtually gone unreported.

The Protest Movement – or “Corona-Rebellen”.

Germans begun demonstrating against Lockdowns as early as April.

And thousands of citizens keep showing up at demos every week-end, even as the government is easing the restrictions.

The demos are not merely against restrictions, which have actually been comparatively mild compared to many other Western countries.

The demos question the entire Corona Narrative, and even more its principals, especially the role Bill Gates is playing, as the WHO second biggest donor (the first one since Trump suspended U.S. contribution).

Indeed the biggest such demos took place in Stuttgart on May 9th, where tens of thousands people assempled to say no – to the NWO.

Germans are saying no to any orwellian solution the government might one day impose out of a questionable “emergency status”, from mass surveillance Apps to mandatory vaccinations.

The leaked report has proved their fears to be well founded.

At least as far as the fake nature of the “Corona pandemic” is concerned.

The rest might soon follow.

Sourced from https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/05/29/german-official-leaks-report-denouncing-corona-as-global-false-alarm/

Public Notice - We are being lied to about the Coronavirus...

CHRIS SPIVEY DECLARES WAR ON EVERYONE!

Chris Spivey the popular alternative media journalist has appeared on Conspiracy This Week Radio, being interviewed by Canadian DJ Dave Boyle, where he launched into a tirade against the British and American governments and specifically the Windsor Royal family, and pretty much everybody else in the world.

Chris Spivey first got involved with conspiracy related media after the 9/11 terror attacks, though confesses to having a feeling of ‘something not right with the world’ since a child.

After originally writing for the Sovereign newspaper, about subjects which ‘pissed him off’, a neighbour created www.chrisspivey.co.uk as a birthday present and readership numbers soon increased month after month; reaching today’s number of 500,000 readers a month.

Asked about the state of the country and people’s attitude to conspiracy, Spivey answers, ‘People have got their heads so far up their arse; there’s no hope left.’

Spivey on the Royal Family

‘They could end world poverty ten times over and still be trillionaires.’

Before going on to ridicule that man who handed over a £10 voucher to Prince Charles to buy his grandson a present.

Spivey goes on a tirade saying that it’s pure madness to give a £10 voucher to a boy who will want for nothing during life, while other children are dying of malnutrition.

Spivey on the Queen

He says ‘She’s fucking evil, and there is nothing gracious or graceful about the cunt’, having said ‘The Queen is fabulously wealthy and could end poverty and not even notice the money gone.’

Spivey on Prince George

‘He will grow up to despise us (the British peasants) by the time he’s 5 years old.’

Spivey on the BBC

‘It’s a paedophiles paradise.’

Chris Spivey and the Canadian DJ go on to discuss why the Windsor royal family allow such damaging rumours of their private life to be circulated.

As they point out, They don’t defend themselves against damaging and libellous allegations of murder, adultery, paedophilia and Satanism. If they never come out to challenge such vile rumours, it implies guilt.

Spivey says ‘They dismiss me and others as the tin foil hat brigade.’

He then goes on to repeat allegations published in his Monsters Inc article, which must be read to understand who the Windsor royal family really are.

• He says the Queen is Winston Churchill’s secret child (quoting from Greg Hallet)
• He calls into question the parental illegitimacy of the Queen’s children, Anne, Andrew and Edward
• He says the Queen vowed never to sleep with Prince Philip again because of his extramarital affairs, and goes further in agreeing with the DJ that the reason the Queen doesn’t share his bed is because he’s a paedophile.
• Calls the film ‘The Kings Speech’ bollocks and propaganda
• Calls the Queen’s father, King George ‘a border-line retard’, adding credence that Winston Churchill is the Queen’s father.
• Says Prince George will become the first (openly) Jewish King on the throne, following the Jewish faith of passing down the bloodline through the mother.

Spivey on David Cameron

‘A wanker’

Spivey on the Cabinet

‘David Cameron and Nick Clegg and all the cabinet are Zionists and take their orders from Israel’, quoting from John Hamer’s book ‘The Falsification of History’ which he is still reading.

Spivey on William Hague

‘William fucking Hague bragging about his £200 bottle of wine paid by us, while kids are left eating jam fucking sandwiches.’

Spivey on Tony Blair

‘He’s a psychopath, a fucking psychopath.’

Spivey on Politicians and Royalty

‘Depravity holds them together.’

‘And what not’

Spivey on David Icke

‘If it’s not in the mainstream media then it isn’t believed and put down to the ramblings of a mad man.’

Spivey on the Woolwich hacking attack

‘The Woolwich incident is a typical false flag event and that people can’t see through it, is sickening’.

In retaliation to the abuse he got for calling Lee Rigby a ‘dog’, he challenges anyone to take apart the evidence he’s put forward in his ‘Drummer Boy’ article.

‘As far as the main evidence is concerned is the act itself and I defy anybody to take my evidence apart or explain what I point out.’

He maintains the Woolwich incident is a typical false flag event and it was all scripted and played out by actors.

He said ‘The daily Mirror video evidence was their biggest mistake.’

• Pointing out in particular the role of the reported pub land-lady, Tina Nimoy (correct spelling unknown), who controlled the crime scene and placed weapons on the ground.

• The bus that blocked the road brought the actors to the stage.

• Pointing out the glaring fact that no police officers went to check Lee Rigby’s body, even though at that point they wouldn’t have known whether he was dead or alive.

• That a uniformed police officer is witnessed to speak to a random bloke, who walks to a paramedics bag and takes something out, before picking something up from the ground and putting it back in the paramedics bag.

• As Spivey reminds us; interfering with a crime scene carries a 7 year sentence.

He claims the evidence he puts forward in the Drummer Boy article is indisputable.  ‘Indisputable’ he repeats, ‘anyone who can say any differently, please do.’

With plenty of funny moments, he lambastes the world leaders across the globe who joined united in their condemnation of the terrorist attacks within hours of the incident.

Calling it ‘total bollocks,’ when David Cameron cut short his French visit, and Ed Miliband cut short his German visit.

Spivey on the Boston Bombing

Telling us he’s working on a new article about Jeff Bauman, who had his legs blown off in the bomb, he says ‘If he lost his legs in that bomb I’d cut my legs off because the whole thing is bollocks.’

Before going on to reiterate his extraordinary pledge of putting his legs where his mouth is.

‘I’m going to expose Jeff Bauman, (and his partner in crime, Carlos the Cowboy) who by his own admission has received $3.85 million in donations. The cunt is laughing at them. If that cunt lost his legs in that bomb, I’d cut my own legs off.’

He goes on to ridicule the bomb which resulted in 12-17 people having amputations, ‘it’s a powerful bomb that concerns who it injuries and doesn’t’, pointing out that a person could have their legs blown off, while the picket fence they stood in front of didn’t suffer even a ripple.

Responding to criticism from others who say that he wouldn’t say what he says in his articles to their faces, Spivey categorically answers-

‘If they pay my plane fare, I would love to meet them face-to-face. I would love to confront these people because they are fucking wankers and they are following a government agenda that wants to kills us all. They are scum.’

Chris Spivey left the listener in no doubt- He’s ready for war…

He’s called the Establishment’s bluff and we can only wait and see how the Palace and 10 Downing Street react.

Make no mistakes about it. With a readership of 500,000 a month and figures rising due to his recent radio appearances, Chris Spivey is a power to be reckoned with.

With a critical mass achieved, the Royal family can no longer simply hold a dignified silence.

This man is making allegations which, not true, would land him in a dark prison cell for 100 years.

In his defence he says ‘With 500,000 a month reading my stuff, its research, research, research; everything I put my name to is correct.’

Chris Spivey is shouting from the roof tops in rage and frustration ‘Do the fucking research, like I have. Read the fucking articles, like I have. Then come back and call me a cunt.’

Leaving the last word to Spivey-

‘People are so stupid they cannot see what’s going on before their eyes and if they can see, they don’t care, because it ain’t happening to them, but they will be coming for them too, that’s for sure.’

Spivey is booked to appear on Conspiracy this Week on 16 August 2013. You can book yourself a seat here.

Listen to the radio interview here. 

and what not...

JOIN THE REBELLION & FIGHT THE EVIL EMPIRE

THANK YOU

CHRIS SPIVEY WAGES WAR AGAINST GOVERNMENT

Drummer Boy by Chris Spivey

Chris Spivey, the popular blogger and voice of the alternative media, has waged war against the British government by publishing an article exposing the Woolwich hacking incident as a Government false flag operation.

Having posting his allegations across a number of articles such as ‘This is not anadvert’, ‘Tears for a Clown’ and ‘Drummer Boy’, he accuses Prime Minister David Cameron, Home Secretary Theresa May, London Mayor Boris Johnson and London Metropolitan Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, amongst many more, of being instrumental in the fake incident at Woolwich where a serving soldier is said to have been hacked to death.

He goes on to use language which could never to repeated on mainstream news outlets, but here at Guerrilla Democracy, we are more than happy to repeat.

He says ‘Now, I am absolutely positive that the reason this pantomime (The Woolwich Hacking) was played out was in order to turn our great nation of half witted fucktards against the Muslim population.’

‘The fact that the Cunt Cameron and his bunch of perverted thieves have taken part in this amateur dramatic production is absolutely unforgivable. The cunts need hanging.’

In no uncertain terms, Chris Spivey has proved beyond reasonable doubt, that the Woolwich incident is indeed not what it seems.

By meticulously studying every frame of the video and pictures released, Spivey has managed to prove that actors participated in the incident and that the narrative the Government put forward is nothing more than wishful thinking and utter nonsense.

Some high-lighted points:

1. The released footage is an amalgamation of two sets of footage.
2. The area of Woolwich in which the incident happened was a closed set, full of actors.
3. That Lee Rigby is not what he seems.
4. The eye witnesses and so called heroines who came to comfort the alleged dead body were actresses.
5. That high placed politicians, military chiefs, Police chiefs and newspaper editors are instrumental in the false flag incident, intended to incite radial hatred against the Muslim communities.

We at Guerrilla Democracy couldn't agree more…

Daily Mail Front-page

Remember the Daily Mail newspaper front page of 1st July 2013? NO' 10 ROCKED BY SECRET LOVE AFFAIR.

The article goes on to state the stunned PM held crisis talks, fearing the scandal would damage his political agenda.

Interestingly that article goes on to reveal that the scandal could ‘blow out of the water any major political set pieces planned by No 10.’

‘Major Political set pieces’, possibly like the Woolwich set piece? We at Guerrilla Democracy think so, yes.

Having highlighted only 5 points raised in the articles, it’s fair to say that Spivey raised dozens more points which prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Woolwich incident was a government false flag operation.

Take the most obvious for example.

Lies, lies and more lies

‘BEHEADED ON A BRITISH STREET’, shouts the Daily Mirror newspaper.

As Spivey points out:

British newspapers were promoting this inaccuracy two days after the incident, fully in the knowledge that no one was beheaded.

As the article states: The entire national press have broken the first rule as set out by the press complaints commission:

1 Accuracy

i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and – where appropriate – an apology published. In cases involving the Commission, prominence should be agreed with the PCC in advance.

iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.

iv) A publication must report fairly and accurately the outcome of an action for defamation to which it has been a party, unless an agreed settlement states otherwise, or an agreed statement is published.

Commenting on the apathy of the public towards the Woolwich false flag incident, Spivey says ‘When those who refuse to – or can’t – accept that the Woolwich murder was a government hoax, but can no longer explain the many anomalies surrounding the fiasco, they adopt a “move on/just let it go” approach.

And therein lays the fucking problem.

Apathy at best, complete, and utter insanity at worst.

Why the fuck should it just be allowed to drop?  Those who say it should may not care about their children and grandchildren, but I’m fucking dam sure I care about mine… So bollocks to just letting it go.

To my way of thinking, there should not be a single adult in this country prepared to just let it go.

Therefore, those of you who do care about your children’s future need to demand answers to the questions that I will raise throughout this investigation into the Woolwich hoax… For a hoax, it surely is.’

But make no mistakes, not everyone is convinced of Chris Spivey’s credentials.

Take Dave Alexander for example, who left a comment on the ‘Who the Fuck is Chris Spivey?’ blog published by Guerrilla Democracy and which is repeated here to maintain journalistic balance...

The reason no-one goes after him is because that's exactly the sort of reaction he wants. When someone makes unfounded ludicrous accusations, often the best thing is not to give them the oxygen of publicity.
Chris Spivey is just an abusive, ranting, homophobic, paranoid egotist who loves having his followers fawning over him telling him how clever he is to be so in-the-know about what's really going on in the world. Whilst he may occasionally come up with something approaching reality, he mostly peddles fear and paranoia on many subjects which really don't stand up to scrutiny.
He should spend less of his time rubbishing the Daily Mail (not something any sane person would waste their time doing; it's a fascist rag not worthy of the term "newspaper") and more time considering how hare-brained his theories about Boston, Woolwich, "chemtrails" etc really are.
Anyone remotely taken in by him should try doing a search for whatever his latest conspiracy is and putting "debunked" on the end of it. You might find that however convincing his arguments are; the evidence he sites is very selectively chosen and everything to the contrary is omitted.
Alternative media are just as guilty of misleading the public for their own ends as the mainstream media are.
I'm not religious but there's a quote which bears repeating; "Beware of false prophets":

With a following of 30,000-40,000 hits a day on his website, Chris Spivey can feel confident of galvanizing the support he’ll need to win his war against the government.

His latest weapon, other than his explosive articles, is refusing to pay his Council Tax bill. If 30 to 40 thousand people were to copy his example on a daily basis, local authorities across the country would be in trouble.

As Chris Spivey says, ‘C’mon people, get a fucking grip. Time is running out. Definitely for me it is anyway, if not for all of us.

Let’s go to war. I’m sick to death of these queer cunts.’

CALL FOR ACTION BY GUERRILLA DEMOCRACY

If you think a British Revolution is the only option for the British People, join us and tell a friend.