Report by Neelu Berry dated 15th March 2024
Mr Justice Bourne Friday 15th March 2024
Not before half past 11
Court 37
KB-2024-000705 Nkrumah v Ministry of Justice
MS Teams or Court 37
For details on accessing the hearing, please email kbjudgeslistingoffice@justice.
https://www.11kbw.com/
https://about.me/charlesbourne MJ Bourne is a Direct Access Barrister.
I arrived outside court 37 at 12:25 PM for the hearing of Akwasi Nkrumah.
I noticed a security guard with intent to stop me going inside the courtroom.
I pretended to walk towards the fees office then did a U-turn as he walked past me. As I entered the courtroom I heard a voice but I continued to enter.
The same security guard then came and sat inside the court hearing for the whole duration, which was very odd. He remained inside court 37 even after we had been locked out at the end. The fact that he was outside court 37 as I approached it, but otherwise remained inside, proves that facial recognition was used in the rear entrance, to warn him that I was inside the building.
Sandra Riley was the Usher, Maryam Qureshi was the admin and a lady called Danielle with blonde hair was the judges Clerk. The judge and the 3 ladies were active on their laptops. Sandra’s laptop had a camera facing the courtroom and was recording a video or live-streaming because the red light next to the camera was “on” throughout the proceedings as if being live streamed to third parties.
Maryam walked over to me and asked if I was related to the parties and if I was a Litigant in person. She probably wanted to exclude me if I was a reporter.
At 12.37 Edward Ellis gave a summary of the case of baby Sunaina. That it was related to the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, there was research into genetic defects of organs. There was destruction of hospital records and protection frauds by courts. The family got the baby’s body to India after receiving the 28 day destruction of body notice. The mother made a claim in the High court in India, which was referred to the law commission of India, which issued a baby body preservation order and proper investigation.
12.46 the judge bizarrely asked Mr Ellis regarding the restraining order, suo motu, which was not a subject matter pleaded in the court proceedings by any party.
12.49 the judge maliciously and predeterminedly asked whether the claimant was an interested party or a “vehicle” for Edward’s claim
1.04 p.m. The judge expressed shock that the claimant had been jailed for driving without insurance but did not make any Injunctive Orders for Protection from Police and Court Perversions.
1.07 p.m. The judge was surprisingly not surprised that Akwasi was framed by Met Police with a class A drugs possession and his children stolen on a false premise, which proved bias against the judge and his unfitness to preside. The judge mocked the Claimant’s oral evidence that his documentary evidence in the case was destroyed by Snaresbrook Crown Court coupled with unexplained delays in his appeal being heard.
1.10pm The judge summarised the case as allegations of generalised corruption against the authorities and adjourned until 2.10 PM
AFTER LUNCH
2.10pm we asked the Usher to explain why the Crown coat of arms was not displayed on the wall but was standing upright on the floor.
The usher lied that it had fallen off the wall. The security guard with Badge 15 RCJ, stated that it had fallen a month ago. The Usher stated it was 2 weeks ago. When questioned about the plaster and the screw holes appearing intact, implying that it had been removed professionally, and the court proceedings being null and void in the absence of the Crest, they finally admitted that court 37 had been used for training during the lockdown and had only reopened for interim applications two months ago. We need to make DSAR enquiries why the Crest has not been erected over the last 2 months.
Court 37 had requirements to complete attendance slips, prior to lockdown, but these were not visible
There were usually jugs of water and cups provided on each bench, prior to lockdown, but these were missing too, suggesting this was a privately hired venue.
When I asked the usher for blank paper to make notes, she offered me a scrap of half an A4. When Akwasi pointed an open filing cabinet with 2 packets of A4 paper, the usher stated that the contents of the cabinet were nothing to do with the court 37, confirming suspicions that the courtroom 37 is not the new Interim applications court but hijacked by the AG and SC to target whistleblowers using the pretence of Interim Applications.
2.19 p.m. The claimant pleaded the disappearance of the evidence, delays of over one year in hearing the appeal, nondisclosure, framing with possession of class A drugs, reputation was damaging his family, he had been jailed and habeas corpus was denied in jail.
2.30 p.m. The claimant pointed out that the defendants in his 2 claims were not present and therefore his claim must be allowed
2.34 pm the judge, did not take on board anything the Claimant stated, again repeated question about the Civil restraining order to Edward, asking for any reasons why he should not renew CRO against Edward Ellis. This was bizarre, bias, evidence of bribes, blackmail or control of Judiciary by the Government Legal Advisors
Edward responded by stating that the Sussex police had given a firearms license to someone who had a statutory prohibition on firearms, Winston Leachman including a rifle which could shoot a president dead from a mile away.
At 2:50 the judge bizarrely asked if there was “recruitment” of the claimant by Edward
2.53 p.m. The claimant stated that under the rules of natural justice Edward was acting as a good Samaritan
2:55 PM Neelu Berry stood up and said “I am Neelu Berry. Edward Ellis is protected by the 18th Law commission of India Report 206”
2.56 The judge stated that the evidence given by by Edward Ellis, a former solicitor was incomprehensible and that he would be giving a judgement
The judge started the judgment by ridiculing the allegations that babies were stolen during caesarean sections and the mothers injected with cancer, which was a contempt of Criminal Law Act 1967 s4 and Law Commission of India’s Report 206.
The Judge repeatedly referred to his laptop, as if he was instructed by other judges, online, citing Lord Justice Coulson, Mrs Justice May and M J Ayre, GCRO by Soole, para 5 – 13, and The expiry of the GCRO on 8th of March 2024, stating that Mr Ellis was not to replicate the conduct.
There must be full disclosure of all computer activity within the courtroom 37 for the entire day 15th March 2024, on grounds of evidence that Court 37, is not on any listings for Monday 18th March 2024, see attached, and is being used for private hearings hijacked by the corrupt leaders within the UK Government, using Direct Access barristers.
The listings for 15th March 2024, see attached, stated that Court 37 would be presided by MJ Bourne, but the Notice pinned outside Court 37 had a female judge sitting at 10am, confirming a double booking to conceal the presence of MJ Bourne.
The judge cited information from his laptop, provided by Unknown third parties, who were not in the proceeding so there was a breach of security and privacy. This was evidence of predetermination and a conspiracy between the other judges.
The judge also mocked the claimant’s allegations that his evidence had been withheld, by Snaresbrook Crown Court.
The judge threatened the claimant with a civil restraining order, for being the latest recruit of Mr Ellis’ beliefs.
The judge then proceeded to make renew civil restraining order for two years against Mr Ellis due to his Litigious activity, for persisting in making claims via others, and Failing to give any reasons for not issuing it except that it was impossible.
Mr Ellis asked leave to appeal CRO and a GPI certificate for the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court
Permission to appeal was refused by the judge
Maryam Qureshi stated that she would email the order to Mr Ellis and that he could pick up a hardcopy from the court.
It was obvious from the Proceedings that Mr Ellis was framed by Mr Justice Bourne, clearly a new recruit, in a predetermination, overseen by the Ex-Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox, Ex-solicitor general Mr Michael Ellis, cabinet, Ministry of Justice, Home Office and metropolitan police.
During lunchtime, I looked at the listings in the main hall and was surprised to see a Notice that the County Court at Central London was not part of Royal Courts of Justice, but part of Gov.uk. This needs investigating as to why the Counter of the Central London County Court was moved to WG07, from the first floor in St Thomas More, if it is independent of RCJ. Also why there is no longer a drop box for the Central London County Court in the main hall whilst its counter requires appointments. This implies that CLCC is not access to justice, only private hearings and bribed judges hijacking the RCJ.
We, the victims of long-term State Terrorism hereby note that the Attorney General's office is continuing with this tradition of denying fees to those who are fees exempted by use of CRO's, Extended CRO's and General CRO's, in a Criminal Cover-up of Civil courts impersonating Criminal Jurisdiction in State Terrorism of whistleblowers, the poor and vulnerable. The UK has the highest turnover of population in the whole world (whereas the population of Palestine is doubling every 10 years in comparison).
A criminal case must be filed against the contempt of the Crown in the Fallen Crest Fake Hearing.
What is stated above is true
Neelu Berry
 |
| Romola D - Edward Ellis - Neelu Berry |
No comments:
Post a Comment