Thursday, 26 May 2016

Matt Taylor's Political Column - Thursday 26th May 2016

Is David Cameron a Necrophile?
Brexit: to Stay or Go?

As far as I'm concerned its all academic whether we stay in the EU or not.

Having taken a keen interest in politics since 1997, and being a wide awake member of the Alternative View/Truth Movement, I've come to look upon this "life changing" referendum in a different light, than the average Joe in the street.

We're doomed if we do and doomed if we don't.

I live by a simple rule when it comes to politics. Whatever politicians say is good, I know its bad. Whatever they say we should do, we shouldn't and whatever they say is bad, I know is good.

Alas, the catch 22 of the EU Referendum is that we have politicians telling us to do one of two things. Either way I don't trust them.

David Cameron is telling us to stay and Boris Johnson is telling us to go. Its with this in mind that I've come to the conclusion that whether we stay or go, its all academic.

Its a set piece of political theatre.

Without knowing the bigger picture, I reckon the hidden powers behind the curtains are using this referendum for a more nefarious purpose than what we are being led to believe.

We must always remember that nothing done by the politicians is done for the benefit of Mankind. Everything is done to promote their own interests and not the interests of the average man or woman in the street.

This EU referendum is nothing more than political theatre designed to set us up for the next big set play.

I imagine that with a looming financial collapse on the horizon, the powers that be are using this EU referendum to placate a hostile population in the event that their bank balances are wiped clean.

I imagine David Cameron is secretly working to get the country to vote out, while publicly campaigning to stay in. He knows his time is up and the referendum is the perfect excuse to manufacture his exit.

Ultimately its going to be a win-win for the politicians.

If the country votes to stay in, the financial collapse comes and can be blamed on the European Union. The solution will come from the European Union and the British Politicians can claim their hands are clean of blame because the collapse was yet another world-wide event, of which they had no control or involvement in.

If the country votes to leave, then when the financial collapse hits, they can assure the people that all is well because due to the separation from the European Union, Britain is perfectly placed to try something new and introduce a brand new monetary system that takes cash out of the equation and brings in a monetary system based on the chip you've implanted into you rear end.

Either way the politicians win.

The referendum will reaffirm the population's faith in democracy. People will think that they do have a choice. People will be thankful for whatever decision is made and will believe that the status quo is fantastic and that any ideas of a British style revolution or up-rising simply isn't desired or required.

We are doomed if we stay or go.

We know that David Cameron won't serve a third term (though that could be up for change). If he wins the vote he'll no doubt stay on and hand over to his best mate George Osborne in 2020.

If the country decides to leave, Dodgy Dave will graciously step aside and a Conservative leadership election may well see Boris Johnson step in as PM.

Either way we are doomed.

Britain comes out of the European Union and a bunch of privately educated Conservative psychopaths will have free rein to rewrite our Human Rights and Law books.

Out of the frying pan into the fire.

Though having said all that; what will I be doing with my 'irrelevant' vote?

Its a good question I've been asking myself...

I sincerely believe that whether I vote for in or out, a predetermined outcome has already been decided.

We all remember Ireland voting to stay out, only for them to be given another vote and told to vote in.

Now if the Queen were to give the British public a referendum as to whether cannabis should be legalized or not, then perhaps I'd have faith in the democratic system. But considering this in or out referendum is the brain child of David Cameron, and ultimately for the benefit of the Conservative party, I'd most probably give the whole thing a miss actually.

Mind you if I was to have my arm twisted to vote, I'd definitely vote out only to watch the circus of watching David Cameron be pushed out of 10 Downing Street and the pantomime of the Conservative party deciding who to put back in.

God I hate Politics...

Madeleine McCann Found Alive and Well.  

With the decision by the Home Secretary Theresa May to inject a further £95,000 of tax payers money into the search of world famous Madeleine McCann, its makes you wonder whether the script writers behind the scenes of world events, are planning to have her found alive and well...

After-all it'd be the perfect way to squash the tiresome conspiracy theorists who claim Madeleine McCann was sold off to some global paedophile ring by her parents, or that she's dead,( as Richard D Hall contends) or buried under Murat's driveway or that she died at the hands of her mother and dumped out at sea.

Mind you, number one conspiracy theorist Chris Spivey has even gone as far to suggest Madeleine McCann never even existed and is a media creation; an actress played by the same person who played the role of murdered school-girl Sarah Payne.

Having Madeleine McCann be found alive and well would be the perfect way to put all these troublesome theories to bed.

Just imagine the headlines and the worldwide euphoria!

As Chris Spivey would no doubt report if it did ever happen; all they will need to do is employ an actress to play the part. Ensure she has the custom made contact lens put in (matching her unique eye structure - which come to think about it, I've been seen on any other human being I've known) and Bob's your uncle.

Madeleine McCann Found Alive and Well.  

Gerry and Kate McCann vindicated and conspiracy theorists never believed again...

King Arthur is Alive & Kicking
The Golden Cube by Matt Taylor

The Hampstead Heath Satanic Cover-up

Katy Bourne SPCC in Expense Scandal

Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films

Chris Spivey Saved by his Fan Base

Saturday, 14 May 2016

King Arthur is Alive and Kicking.

One day King Arthur will return in our nation's darkest hour, or so the prophecy says.

The legend of King Arthur has endured for centuries and rightly so. The reason the King Arthur legend has endured is because it’s actually true.

Unlike the fables of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Abominable Snowman, the true story of King Arthur can be found written in the annuals of the Ancient Khumry manuscripts, better known as the ancient historical manuscripts of British history.

Rediscovered by the historical detectives Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, there have actually been five King Arthur's throughout British history, of which the first two were the most famous.

King Arthur I, who lived from 355AD to 388AD fought the Romans, son of Magnus Maximus, who himself was son of Constantine the Great. The second King Arthur was born in 503AD and died in 579AD, famed for fighting the Saxons, son of King Maurice, who himself was the son of King Theoderic.

Separating fact from fiction, no sword was ever pulled from a stone and Merlin wasn't a wizard, but instead King Arthur II's mentor and teacher. Both King Arthur I and II were directly related to each other, both in a long line of Kings reaching back to the first King of Britain, King Brutus and further back to the Holy Family, descended from Anne, sister of Mary, mother of Jesus Christ himself.

Written in the Coelbren language of the ancient British, (Welsh to be exact,) Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett contend that ancient British history is the most well recorded and chronicled history in the world.

It would appear that throughout history the tales and deeds of both King Arthurs, first recounted by 12th historian Geoffrey of Monmouth, had been rolled into one.

Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films.

A growing movement of historical enthusiasts are calling for the boycotting of Guy Ritchie's new King Arthur movie set for release in 2017, criticizing it for being based on the romantic rubbish of 15th Century French writer Chretien de Troyes, and peddled on behalf of a German royal dynasty.

A growing band of patriotic Brits are claiming the real British history has been covered up since 1066, by a succession of foreign royal dynasties.

Read more: Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Films.
Read more: The King Arthur II Movie 'Voom' Pitch.

Richard Branson 'Vooms' to the rescue.

Just as there were two versions of the Robin Hood movies released at the same time, the 'Boycott Guy Ritchie's King Arthur Movie's community' have turned to Richard Branson's £1 Billion 'Voom' initiative to finance a new King Arthur II movie to rival Guy Ritchie's. With a budget of two million, movie producers hope to convince Richard Branson to invest his money in three blockbuster movies which tell the real story of King Arthur II, and what really happened during the Dark Ages.

From King Arthur II's birth in Wales, to his epic battles against the Picts and Saxons, which unified Britain, to his Summer Games, to the catastrophic asteroid debris which hit Britain in 562AD, to King Arthur II's escape to America in 575AD which a fleet of 700 ships, to his tragic assassination by a Red Indian in 579AD, its sure to be a fantastic trio of films which will rewrite history forever.

Please show your appreciation with a donation.