"Pope Francis, this is a notice of warning against you the third party illegal alien person and all persons as fraudsters in your Jesuit Order Catholic Church. Usurping King William IV Admiralty Court Martial Law while we are his main Contract Partner Inheritor of his Kings Bench Royal Revenue and Laws on England Soil Land Laws of England that Moai King William V Surrogate King of Hanover has the first Claims of King William IV Admiralty Court Martial Law as his Private Contract and Commercial Trading Bank of England Britain UK Legitimate Legal Authority Common Law and Moai Crown Gods Lore Business Partner."
John Wanoa: Moai King William V Surrogate King of Hanover 22 September 2015
Fantasist Matt Taylor, claiming to be the Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner has publicly declared that if elected the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner in 2016, he would sack the Chief Constable of Sussex Police force Giles York with immediate effect.
Labelled a “self serving snake” and “court jester” by Nailtown Slim aka Snerper, Matt Taylor, once considered a leading writer in the alternative media has come under sustained criticism for publicly deriding the work of granddad Chris Spivey, himself recently found guilty of harassment against the family of murdered solider Lee Rigby in a Chelmsford court last month.
Tory grandee Ann Widdecombe has slammed
conspiracy theorists in her weekly Daily Express column.
With the title- 'Take it from me,
conspiracy theorists will never change their mind,' the
overweight spinster ridicules those of us who believe that Dr David
Kelly was murdered by secret forces, that Lady Diana was killed on
the orders of the Royal Family and that Neil Armstrong ever walked on
the moon.
Specifically targeting Grand-dad Chris
Spivey, who having been convicted of harassing the family of Lee
Rigby, Widdecombe writes:
“Christopher Spivey is a
conspiracy theorist who has made the lives of Lee Rigby’s family
hell. He believes, without any foundation, that the murder was a plot
to whip up anti-Islamic feeling. He even claimed that the soldier
never existed and his harassment of the relatives landed him in
court.
The exasperated judge rightly
said that nothing would ever convince Spivey that he was wrong. Every
MP knows the type: the constituent who in the teeth of evidence will
insist there is a conspiracy. I had one who believed I was a
Freemason conspiring with the police to persecute her!”
“WITHOUT FOUNDATION.”
Ignoring a wealth of inconsistencies in
the official narrative, Chris Spivey isn't the only notable
conspiracy theorist who believes not everything was what it seems.
Take Nick Kollerstrom and The Kent
Freedom Movement for example; having published his ground breaking
book on the London 7/7 Bombing 'Terror on the Tubes,' he too has
visited Woolwich and has roundly disproved the official narrative of
the day.
This latest snippet of footage asks the
obvious question; WHERE'S THE BLOOD?
For Ann Widdecomb to imply there is no
'foundation' to the Woolwich incident, illustrates perfectly
the 'Madness of Widdecombe.'
Mind you in fairness to journalistic
impartiality, a comment posted by Lilly Bing states:
“I was there. I can tell you
now I saw that poor man and there was blood all over the place
including the 2 who carved him up. He was covered in blood and that
was not photoshopped at all. The sad thing is, there are many cover
ups going on but if people like this organisation disbelieve and pick
apart every event, when something real actually happens they just
assume you're wearing tin foil hats and have nothing better to do.
The government cover up some god awful events but you're making it
worse. People think you've lost the plot and you're all loonies so if
you ever find a REAL truth nobody will believe you. I'm not naive I
know there are many fabricated stories out there 911 being
orchestrated by Bush, Haute de la Grande cover up etc but this WAS a
real event. R.I.P Lee Rigby.”
Someone is lying. If someone had his
head nearly hacked off, there would be an awful lot of blood, but as
the video shows, no blood at all.
Its interesting Lilly refers to the
“many fabricated stories of 911” & “Haute
de la Grande” but gives credence to the Woolwich incident
by stating she was an eye witness who saw with her own two eyes
“blood all over the place,” contradicting the video
evidence shown above and the many pictures published in the
newspapers.
Mind you since joining in August 22,
2012 Lilly Bing has had no activity across the board, which suggests
whoever Lilly Bing is, she created a Google + profile just to leave
that specific comment.
We are continuously warned about MI5
operatives engaged in Social Media manipulation and this comment
seems to confirm he scaremongering often spread in Conspiracy
Theorist circles.
Ann Widdecombe continues:
“People deny the Holocaust.
They deny Armstrong walked on the moon. They believe CIA agents were
hiding in the bushes to murder Dr David Kelly or that the late
Princess of Wales was killed on the orders of the Royal Family. They
think UFOs have landed.”
Funnily enough Nick Kollerstrom has published a book about the
Holocaust; Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality.
A quote taken from the foreword by James H
Fetzer.
“Dr. Kollerstrom concludes that
the history of the Nazi "Holocaust" has been written by the
victors with ulterior motives and that this history is distorted,
exaggerated and largely wrong.”
Then we have former Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker's book about Dr.
David Kelly's alleged murder; The Strange Death of David Kelly
published in 2007.
He writes with conviction, “I
am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this could not be
suicide. The medical evidence does not support it and David Kelly's
state of mind and personality suggests otherwise. It was not an
accident so I am left with the conclusion that it is murder."
Once a collation MP in the Lib/Con
government first as a Transport Minister, then the First Minister for
Crime Prevention and responsible for Britain's equivalent to the FBI;
The National Crime Agency; the Madness of Widdecombe knows know
bounds as she tramples the reputation of a respected member of
parliament.
She continues:
“Such people all function
perfectly normally in everyday life and before the birth of the
internet most conspiracy theorists were harmless and caused no
greater sensation than incredulous laughter in a pub. Now they can
disseminate their views sufficiently widely to hurt survivors or
families and even attract others to their causes.”
“Wrong again you old witch,”
Chris Spivey might say. Research out of University of Winchester,
conducted by psychologist Michael Wood suggests the label “Conspiracy
Theorist” no longer implies an idea worthy of immediate dismissal.
“It is possible that the
conspiracy-theory label has simply lost some of the power it once
had,” Wood writes in the journal Political Psychology.
I'd go so far to suggest the label of
Conspiracy Theorist has lost its negative connotations, for the
simply reason the researches like Nick Kollerstom, Chris Spivey and
Richard D Hall (amongst many many more) have put forward such
convincing hypothesises of national and international events, that
the Powers That Be, simply cannot explain their actions away.
THE PEOPLE REALLY ARE WAKING UP!
After-all a You Gov poll in 2013
revealed a whooping 38% of British people didn't believe Princess
Diana died in an accident. 33% were bold enough to say outright they
believed she was assassinated.
Even Queen Elizabeth II, upon hearing
the news of her death, is alleged to have commented:
“Someone must have greased the
brakes.”
Now even the Queen is a Conspiracy
Theorist.
DID MAN WALK ON THE MOON?
With extraordinary footage like the
clip below reveals; the question of whether Neil Armstrong really
stood on the moon is a question worth asking.
The Madness of Widdecombe really does
know no bounds.
“It is right that Christopher
Spivey should have been prosecuted if only in order to protect Lee
Rigby’s family but he will go to his grave believing the rot he
promulgates.”
I dare her to say that to his face.
Taking into consideration the nightmare Chris Spivey has endured at
the hands of Essex Police and the Social Services, I find it
incredulous that a retired Tory grandee can condone an illegal
prosecution, an affront to British justice and an abuse of a man's
human rights, for doing nothing else but flagging up a false flag
events which has enormous repercussions to the British people and
Britain's way of life.
“It makes me wonder whether
there is still anybody around who believes Earth is flat.”
While Grand-dad Chris Spivey is under
the impression he's done much to bring the Alternative Media
together, the truth couldn't be further away from the reality.
“It is in fact fair to say that
this disgraceful court decision has achieved a bit of unity in the
Alternative Media and that is surely a good thing?”
A hero to his loyal fans, an internet
troll to the ignorant man in the street, and a loving father and
Grand-dad to his daughter Stacey and his grand-son Clayton; Chris
Spivey doesn't impress me very much!
Reaching new levels of respect for his
journalistic investigative skills with his judicially fatal article
'The Drummer Man,' Chris Spivey travelled further down the fabled
'Rabbit's Hole' than any other journalist has dared to go so far.
Taking nothing away from what he's
already achieved; I'm disappointed in what he's failed to address,
namely the Hampstead case.
ITS HARD WORK BEING A SPIVEY READER.
To be a Chris Spivey reader, you need
at least three special qualities:
A tolerance of bad language and
vulgarity.
Patience to read really really
really long articles.
Imagination to suspend reality.
More often than not readers just had to
take what he said at face value and trust that Chris Spivey had done
the thorough research he claimed to have undertaken.
As he keeps telling us:
“For obvious reasons there has
been no major articles added of late as they take time and a lot of
research to compile.”
I've personally lost all my friends
over his Drummer Man article:
I expect many of his readers had to
stretch their imagination of reality when Chris Spivey claimed:
Jade's Goodie's mum – Jackie
Budden was Brenda Leyland, the McCann troll who was alleged to have
committed suicide.
There is a comment on The Tap News Wire
which reads:
Is Chris Spivey losing the plot?
A few days ago he posted an
article suggesting the possibility that the ‘McCann troll’ Brenda
Leyland, who was outed by Sky News and subsequently went on to commit
suicide allegedly was or might have been played by Jackie Budden! JB
is the mother of the late Jade Goody and looks nothing like Brenda
Leyland.
When a number of his devoted
followers attempted to put him right in a sensible and helpful way,
he went bl**dy mad, as he always does when even mildly criticised.
Though in all fairness, he didn't claim this to be fact, but only an
theory worthy of discussion!
Then the contention that the Prime
Minister's wife Sam Cameron, doubled as Elizabeth Owen, a witness to
the 7/7 London Bombing.
That Jimmy Jone's wife Jane
Russell is actually Sonia Poulton, a journalist on David Icke's now
defunct TPV television station.
That all the family photographs of
Prince William and Princess Kate, with their son Prince George are
photoshopped.
To his most famous claim to date
that Lee Rigby didn't actually exist, and was actually fictional
creational based on three individuals, Karl Whittle, Robert Sarjeant
and Chris Amos.
Beware that these are just five
examples of many many more extraordinary claims Chris Spivey makes on
his website www.chrisspivey.org.
Chris Spivey could be right! But then
again he could be barking up the wrong tree. It's hard work having to
plough through the thousands of words and dozens of pictures he pus
forward to validate his claims.
Only his most loyal supporters stick
with him, without voicing any criticism. While Spivey appears to have
lost support from the more mainstream reader, his most staunch
supporters band closer together to ensure any criticism of him is
roundly pounced upon, smeared and ridiculed.
I USED TO BE HIS MATE.
Once mentioned as 'Matt My Mate,' I've
lost my position as being one of Spivey's most trusted allies.
“The slightly eccentric, but a
fucking nice fella all the same, Matt Taylor.”
Now I don't even get a mention.
Following Spivey's most recent blog,
'“Spiv
is a wrong-un look you, is it.”' in which he derides The Outlaw
Jimmy Jones for being a troll and reiterates his claim that Jane
Russell is actually Sonia Poulton; a reader called Lesley left a
comment in jest which could just as well be levelled against me!
“I understand how he feels.
When Chris doesn’t pay me any attention I feel rejected and
frustrated as well especially as I am his #1 fan. Its hell!”
To which Chris personally applauded her
with the message:
“Excellent comment Lesley.
Chris xxx”
I'll happily admit to feeling rejected.
When mentioning Alternative Media news sources in his blog, Chris
Spivey omits to mention Guerrilla Democracy News, of which I am
always boasting is a big hitter in the Alternative News media.
I feel frustrated that when I ask him a
question, all I get is Lisa Peabody answering on his behalf.
I considered myself his number one fan
and always beamed with pride if he ever mentioned my name in one of
his articles.
Ego aside, I knew he had given me a
mention because the readership numbers for Guerrilla Democracy News
would always spike whenever he did.
“DO ONE! OTHERWISE I WILL.”
It all went wrong between Chris Spivey
and I when the Hampstead case broke... And its this case which has
compelled me to write this blog publicly voicing my disappointment in
him.
Now you have to understand that up
until this time, Chris Spivey would pounce upon any and every example
of false flag government wrong doing and anything else that twanged
his bullshit antennae for that matter.
Any Daily Mail news report that
reported bullshit, Spivey would be on it.
Any news about the aftermath of
the Woolwich incident, Spivey would be on it.
Any news about paedophiles getting
away with it, Spivey would be on it.
This made it all the more frustrating
that when the Hampstead case broke, nothing was forthcoming.
I'll readily admit that up until this
time I had become reliant on Spivey's opinion. I know the likes of
Ian R Crane would encourage us to do our own research rather than
taking their word for it, but I had come to take Spivey's word for it
because I simply never had the time to do my own research and relied
on people like Spivey, Richard D Hall and James Corbett for doing the
research for me.
When the Hampstead case broke my jaw
dropped to the floor as much as everyone's else. Chris Spivey and
Bill Maloney had been telling us for years that Satanic Worshippers
ruled the world and this was the first time we were getting first
hand testimony of what was happening from within the sick satanic
cults.
I would have bet my month's wage that
Spivey would cover it; but he didn't and my frustration grew and
grew.
The new darling of the Alternative
Media Danielle La Verite, in conjunction with her handler Thomas
Sheridan were quick to publicly renounce and discredit the Hampstead
kids testimony.
I simply couldn't understand why people
wouldn't believe them and turned to Chris Spivey for guidance and
advice.
As far as I was concerned, Danielle La
Verite was abusing her new found fame to discredit and renounce the
testimony of two kids, who in my humble opinion should be praised for
telling their story.
In a moment of frustration I sent Chris
Spivey the following message:
“Get off the fucking fence
Chris. You owe it to your fans.
One way or the other; do you
support DLV or not?
As far as I'm concerned she is
dragging the Truth Movement through the mud and I'm very disappointed
and disillusioned.
Get off the fence Chris and tell
it like it is.”
To which he readily replied:
“Have a word with yourself
Matt, you are losing the plot.
You are becoming a figure of fun,
and from where I sit the only people dragging the truth movement
through the mud are the likes of you & Catshit... Why the fuck
should it matter to you what Danielle believes or doesn't?
She is entitled to her opinion
and just because it differs from yours is no reason to spit your
dummy out.
And lets face it Matt, you have
made some awful errors of judgement of late... Like apologising to
that drug addicted paid troll in the jungle for one... What the fuck
has that self obsessed soppy cunt ever done to help further the
movement that you are so concerned about being dragged through the
mud?
My advice to you is worry about
your own shop before trying to put other peoples in order... And that
most definitely includes mine, because right now you are coming
across as an egotistical, spoilt brat, with fuck all to brag about.
Who I support and who I don't has
fuck all to do with you or anyone else... However, now you have
brought the subject up, I don't remember seeing you at my court case
last month... Course, shouting your mouth off at me is a sure fire
way of losing mine.”
LIKE A KICK TO THE
HEAD!
I had never been
on the receiving end of Chris Spivey's wrath before and in all
honesty it hurt.
While I thought he
was way of the mark, I was willing to take his remarks on the chin
and carry on.
After all:
Tom Cahill
had up until that point attacked nearly everyone in the Alternative
Media. While Spivey choose to react by calling him names, I choose
to extend my hand of friendship. Keep your friends close but keep
your enemies closer!
I believed it
did matter what Danielle La Verite believed. She was targeting the
Alternative Media audience and was using her fame to discredit
testimony which I believed and still believe to be trustworthy.
Being called
“an egotistical, spoilt brat, with fuck all to brag about,”
was hurtful but I could
handle it. Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never
hurt me.
Though what stung me the most was his comment, “I don't
remember seeing you at my court case last month...”
Yeah, I don't remember him coming to my defence when I was arrested
for saving an OAP's life too.
We know from his blogs that Spivey hasn't got time to read anyone
else's blogs because he's too busy writing his own. Its a shame,
because if he had read shadowsussexpolicecrimecommissioner he would have known that I was tied up fighting Sussex Police
corruption and spending all my time, effort and money helping a very
scared old man fight of dangerous thugs, who were in partnership with
a corrupt Sussex Police force.
But either way; I let it go because I knew Spivey was under
considerable pressure from Essex Police himself.
I've been in the same position. When I left the Army following the
death of my mother, I returned home to discover my sister was a
heroin addict and that my two nieces, aged 6 and 9 at the time, were
living in a heroin den, in danger from the weirdos and drug users my
sister was letting in.
I contacted the
Social Services myself, only for them to goto my sister for
clarification, where my sister manipulated the facts and turned them
around calling me the mad one, whose information was unsound.
I fought hard,
tooth and nail for the next 6 months to get my nieces away from
danger and my sister the help she needed to kick her heroin habit.
I knew what he was
going through... While Spivey had no idea what I was going through!
LISA JANE PEA aka LISA PEABODY.
Time went by and Spivey's blog became
more prolific and his claims more bizarre and strange.
Take for example his article 'Double
Crossed' which is a good place to start.
I challenge anyone to read through this
without scratching their heads. It ends with his contention that
“Brenda Leland – the so called McCann troll who topped
herself – who in turn is the late Jade Goody’s mother, Jackiey
Budden… Just sayin’.”
He started to back up his claims of
various crisis actors being one and the same, by introducing a face
comparison application, which matched the likeness of each face in
percentage terms.
Father & Daughter
Any scientist who makes a claim usually
publishes their methods to allow other scientists to re-create their
experiments to determine whether their claims are sound or not.
Pryce is the Pope & I'm Barry from Eastenders
I became interested in what face
comparison application Spivey used because someone made the bizarre
claim that the actor Jonathan Pryce was actually Pope Francis and I
wanted to test the comparison myself. So I asked him what face
comparison application he used via Facebook messenger.
To which I receive a message from Lisa
Peabody telling me I should “ask him personally.”
And here's me thinking sending him a
Facebook message was asking him personally.
What I found most amusing was her
comment, “I could easily find out and perhaps would, if it
was someone else asking, however I am very loyal.”
I should have expected it really, after
all, Lisa Peabody doesn't like to be questioned!
THE TRUE FACTS.
I reached the end of my tether when
Spivey posted his last blog before his sentencing on 27th
August 2015.
The first line read:
“Ahead of Thursday’s
sentencing, here are THE TRUE FACTS of what has really taken place
since July 30th 2014, ALL OF WHICH CAN BE EVIDENCED. Please share
this report far and wide because next time it could be you caught up
in a nightmare from where there appears to be no escape.”
I was particularly interested in
reading this because I wanted to know how my name was mentioned twice
during his court date. Apparently I had been accredited with creating
and posting the mock Sun Newspaper front page which had gotten Spivey
in so much trouble.
Taken from the Court's transcript:
“The Sun 'mock headline'
was posted by a Matt Taylor as anybody can post on Spivey's Facebook
account. Spivey had been threatened with violence regarding various
posts and subjects on Facebook in the past.”
“The Prosecution suggested
that the 'mock' Sun posting on his Facebook page, even though posted
by Matt Taylor had then been 'adopted' by him by not deleting it,
and asked if Spivey agreed with its content. Spivey replied that he
had, "No feelings one way or the other".
Surprised that Spivey promised to lay
out “The True Facts,” I was disappointed he never addressed how I
was apportioned blame for posting the mock Sun newspaper front-page.
After-all Lisa Peabody had already
admitted it was her.
I was simply interested as to how it
happened; especially considering everything I posted on Chris
Spivey's Facebook page never stuck and was always refused with an
error message.
I asked one more time in the comment's
section of Spivey's 'Harassed' article:
“Good recap of the facts, but
from a personal point of view, it doesn’t answer how my name came
to be mentioned in court?”
To which Pongo was kind enough to
reply:
“Matt – your name was
mentioned because of the `screen grab` on Chris` Facebook page when
you posted it, that was in the `legal bundle`.”
And that was fine... My question was
answered and while I was still confused as to why they could 'screen
grab,' something I had never posted, I was willing to let bygones be
bygones and leave it be.
But little old Lisa Peabody just had to
add her penny's worth...
And its for this reason and this reason
alone that I am so disappointed in Chris Spivey.
If I had wanted Lisa Peabody's opinion
I would have asked Lisa Jane Pea. The reason I ask Chris Spivey's
opinion is because I want Chris Spivey's opinion, not someone I've
never met and know nothing about.
And still Chris Spivey remains silent
on the Hampstead case... I've come to realise that Spivey isn't all
he's cracked up to be!
Leaving the last word to Lisa Peabody:
“Yes we know what issue you
would like everyone to address Matt, unfortunately the reasons you
want them addressed seem to be more about "you" than
anything else... how you feel, blah blah blah..... You feel let
down, after all you gave bill 20 kwid once.. I gave the peoples
voice a fiver and iI'm not still banging on about it. You have a
blog, write what you want on there, find the time to do your own
research instead of making demands from everyone else. I see you
feel so strongly about this that you have unfriended me and yet not
Chris.... I think you are somewhat deluded and confused x”
