Fraud
investigator, Royal Commission Protected Witness and an all-round
Peaceful Warrior, 69 year old Sir John Paterson, was sentenced to 21
days in prison, suspended for 12 months, for being in contempt of
court.
A
packed public gallery heard how in April 2017, John Paterson secretly
recorded a court case at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, on a
small voice recorder.
Even
though all court cases are recorded and available to the public, and
whilst in some circumstances permission can be given to record court
proceedings, Mr Paterson was subjected to 2 years of state sponsored
torture, threatened with jail, and fines, for recording a public
event, for his own educational and personal reasons.
In-side
the Royal Courts of InJustice
Once
Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis kicked off the
proceedings, (with the latter doing all the talking), Citizen John
Paterson addressed the court, stating he has Crown Protection and for
his witness Equity Lawyer, Edward Ellis, to explain further.
Upon
being refused Mr Paterson said,
“It
is my right to do so,” after
which Edward Ellis said to the Judges, “You
have no jurisdiction,” to
which Mr Justice William Davis replied, “Having
heard what I’ve just heard, Mr Ellis, go and sit in the public
gallery.”
Judgement
of Court
Having
endured the stress and strain of having imprisonment, fine or both,
hanging over his head for the last two years, a packed public gallery
heard the Application by the Attorney General for the imprisonment of
Mr Paterson for contempt of court.
With
the verdict hanging in the balance, whispered chat throughout Court
16 was of a suspended sentence.
Who is Mr.X?
Mentioned
in the harassment case of Christoper D Spivey in 2015 (against the
family of the murdered soldier Lee Rigby,) and now again in Mr
Paterson’s contempt case, Mr.X was referred to by name; all further
information is REDACTED.
It
was explained by the Prosecution that at the time of the recording,
it wasn’t noticed, but came to light later when audio of the
REDACTED
CASE
was
uploaded to Youtube.
Having
hid the recording device in the base of a house plant, police
initially missed it when they raided his property in relation to the
REACTED
CASE,
on the 8th May 2017.
Mr
Paterson voluntarily surrendered the listening device which was found
to have 5 recordings of the REDACTED
CASE.
With
good support in the public gallery, loyal friend and supporter Neelu
Berry entered court late; having had herself a busy night, sparing
with the forces of Satan knocking at her door at a quarter to eleven,
protecting ‘Cure for Cancer’ whistle-blower, Lynda Thyer.
State Sponsored Assassination Attempt
Looking
relaxed, at peace and calm, Mr Paterson lent back against the
Queen's bench, as the Prosecution and Judges waffled on for 15
minutes, talking legalese between themselves.
Slowly
and surely a consensus was agreed upon;
- No one was aware of the recording
- Mr Paterson had offered it for transcribing, all offers were declined
- The recording was made for his own personal use
Citing
more evidence against him, via his emails, proving his contempt, the
Judge asked in no uncertain terms, “What
excuse do you have for recording a public event?”
“I
had to because I’m exposing the corrupt judiciary. I do not accept
it’s a contempt of court,”
Mr
Paterson answered.
Going
further, Mr Paterson said
“The
PM and Attorney General have provided protection frauds for organised
crime.”
No
witnesses from the Prosecution
Standing
before the Judges alone and without any legal representation, the
Prosecution called no witnesses, while Mr Paterson was allowed to
cross examine DC Grimwood.
Mr
Grimwood takes the stand
With
the Prosecution asking Mr Grimwood to open a number of bundles of
paper, and to confirm that the Statement of 19 June 2017, was a true
and accurate account of the events, and whether another statement on
24 May 2019, was also his own, the Prosecution wrapped it up and it
was Mr Paterson’s turn to cross examine him.
Mr
Paterson started by asking him to confirm whether he had received
information about serious crimes of State and Judiciary?
Looking
for guidance from Mr Justice William Davis to continue, DC Grimwood
confirmed that he had.
Pressed
by the Judge as to whether there were anymore questions, Mr Paterson
asked why he hadn’t done anything about the serious crimes he had
already reported?
“I’m guilty of trying to save my country.”
- Mr Justice William Davis - “Do you accept that you did record the proceedings?”
- Sir John Paterson - “Yes I did, I had to do it.”
- Mr Justice William Davis - “Do you accept its contempt of court?”
- Sir John Paterson - “No. I’ve had to do it, to bring the fraud to the attention of the public.”
Confirming to the court that Mr Paterson had reported serious crimes of government and judiciary to himself, and confirming that he is in possession of all the evidence Mr Paterson possessed, DC Grimwood was allowed to leave the witness stand.
- 10.37am The Fantastic Four arrive, and pile into the public gallery
- Frank McElheron, David Ellis, Bryn Real and Tony Livingstone.
The
Judges rose to reassess the situation at 10.50am.
Mr
Justice William Davis offers Mr Paterson a choice of taking the
witness stand or to remain seated. Either to give evidence or make
submissions.
(It’s
all legalese to me.)
As
the mis-trial continued unabated, Mr Paterson was denied legal
representation, and was left with no alternative but to defend
himself against the Attorney General, (who was costing the taxpayer
£19K a day)
A
Mistrial and an Injustice of Justice
Mr
Paterson read out the introduction of a prepared statement by Edward
Ellis, declaring he wanted the Equity Lawyer to explain further, but
is unable to.
"This
conduct
does amount to contempt of court,”
sneered
the Prosecution.
With
gasps from the public gallery, the Judges concluded that Mr Paterson
has been proved to be in contempt, and that the respondent knew he
wasn’t allowed to record but went ahead and did so anyway.
The
Judge summed up in disjointed language, “Your
defense of corruption has nothing to point.”
The
Judges have now moved onto working out how long to sentence him.
“This
is a set up, poor guy,”
said
a member from the public gallery.
The
facts established are as follows:
- He voluntarily submitted the listening device to police
- He hasn’t undertaken any recording since
- He’s never published anything online about the REDACTED proceedings
“Here's
hoping for a suspended sentence,”
said
one member in the public gallery to the other, “the
Judges appear to be considerate that John has been a good boy.”
Mr
Paterson’s previous Common Law lawyer and friend, Patrick
Cullinane is mentioned. Mr Paterson’s voiced his fear that what
happened to Patrick will happen to him.
“I
don’t think he’s going down, but will be given a suspended
sentence. I really hope so,”
said
one reporter to the other.
Whispering
between themselves like sly bullies at school, conspiring to cause
harm, loss and injury to the unfortunate souls they’ve chosen to
pick on, both Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis moved
onto discussing case studies, to determine how much time they can
legally sentence him to.
Citing
Mr Scarf, a 78-year-old pensioner, who received 28 days suspended for
2 years, for continually committing contempt of court, and Mr
Cullinane, (Mr Paterson’s Common Law Lawyer) for his alleged
crimes of contempt, both Judges were scratching around the bottom of
the barrel, to find the case law allowing them to enforce a
custodial sentence.
With
nothing against Mr Paterson’s character and good standing, the
Prosecution reverted to type and raised Mr Paterson’s previous
offence of obstructing a police officer.
With
a visible softening of the Judges, the packed gallery prayed for a
suspended sentence, and muttering threats of revolution if it wasn’t
given.
It
was acknowledged by the Prosecution of the real concern of living in
a world where it’s hard to enforce this law, with the technology of
listening devices, getting smaller and smaller.
“This
is a matter of importance for the public issue,”
declared
Mr Justice William Davis, climbing upon his moral high-ground, built
upon the crimes of generations of his predecessors, “Now
Mr Paterson, we have to decide what to do with you.”
Invited
to give his response to the litany of lies, twisted-truths and
allegations, leveled against his good character for the last 10
minutes, John was quick to explain what happened when the police
assaulted him at Seaford.
To
paraphrase;
“I
was standing with my friend waiting to collect my car after it’s
MOT. A police officer comes up to me and says he wants to search me
because I’m being suspicious. He pushed me and assaulted my
friend.”
During
a passionate defense of himself on the day in question, Mr Paterson
came coming across as a mild mannered gentlemen, unfairly treated by
the state, convinced he is fighting a corrupt government and
judiciary.
“That’s
when my story began.”
One
reporter was heard saying to another, “John
is giving an impassioned speech before the judge.”
Talking
about REDACTED
CASE.
Now
Mr Paterson is giving it to the Judges with both barrels, talking
about Patrick Cullinane, “In
a court of law there is no justice, because even if you are innocent
you are found guilty.”
With
mentions of Gordon Bowden and Brian Setchfield, referencing the
criminal frauds of the Finchley Road Boiler Room, and the police
crimes of Bohemia Police station in Hastings; Mr Justice William
Davis was keen to rein Mr Paterson in.
“I
do understand you have these concerns,”
he
said interrupting Mr Paterson’s tirade, to which Paterson replied
in astonishment, “Concerns.”
Mutterings
from the Public Gallery growing louder and louder.
“Is
there anything you want to add, that makes what you did less
serious,” asks
Mr Justice William Davies.
“Well
I would have loved to bring in more witnesses, but the last time I
tried to bring in a witness, they stopped me.”
“I'll
glad I’m here to explain myself to the public,”
declares
Mr Paterson, before stating for the purposes of the Court’s tape
- “David Joe Neilson is too scared to return to his home, because he fears he'll be killed by Sussex police.”
- “Institutions have been infiltrated by organised crime.”
To
which Mr Lord Justice William Davies, replied in defiance,
“That’s
for another day,”
before
standing up and declaring a recess.
John
Paterson is Smashing It.
Back
in Court 16 at 11.25, Mr Justice William Davies declared with puffed
chest and venom on his voice, “we
are here to sentence John Paterson for contempt of court.”
“It’s
been proved.”
The
Attorney General gave these aggravating and mitigating features;
- Previously recorded at another case
- Length of the recordings, over several hours
- Not significant but a recording of a sensitive case
- The nature of the proceedings that the recordings dealt with, could have aggregated matters
- The response to previous convictions of obstructing a police officer
- Mr Paterson has cooperated with the police operation fully
- He promised not to do it again, and he hasn’t for the last 2 years, honouring his statement
- Used the recording for his own personal needs, and hasn’t disseminated it further
- Mr Paterson is 67, (corrected to 69 by Mr Paterson)
- Mr Paterson is of good character
- Length of time the case has taken to come to court
- Mr Cullinane and Mr Scarf were given as case studies; on both occasions, the sentence was found to be excessive on appeal
Mr
Justice William Davies reiterates, “Recording
without permission is a serious matter, and the law must be fully
complied with.”
and
then adds, “In
appropriate circumstances, the proceedings can be allowed to be
recorded. What is not permissible is allowing the public to take
action into their own hands.”
This
is a sentence which is the basis of why Mr Paterson finds himself
facing imprisonment.
Let’s
put it into perspective; Over 2 years earlier, Mr Paterson recorded
the audio of a case, which was being recorded anyway, and made
available to the public, and that in ‘appropriate circumstances’
the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded.
The
Judge made it perfectly clear why Mr Paterson is in the dock.
“What
is not permissible is allowing the public take actions In their
hands.”
"The
Sentence is to imprison you for 21 days, suspended for 12 months. Do
you understand Mr Paterson. Keep out of trouble for 12 months and
that will be the end of it.”
Paterson
immediately asked permission to appeal, to which was instantly
refused.
“It’s
the discretion of the court,”
screamed
the Judge over the hissing from the public gallery.
Prolonging
the agony, the Attorney General caught the Judges attention to
hight-light two auxiliary matters.
“Forfeiture
of the recording device and destruction of it.”
“I
don’t think its lawful to destroy evidence in relation to my case,”
replied
Mr Paterson in response to the application of the destruction of
recording device.
“Charlotte
Wright from the BBC should be held in contempt too,”
said
Mr Paterson, complaining that she also recorded the same court case,
but was allowed to do so, because she was from the BBC.
After
a few moments of hushed whisper, the Judge’s decree that the micro
SD card will be destroyed, but not the actual recording device.
“If
you destroy that, you are destroying evidence,”
decried Mr Paterson, to which the Judge reiterated, “I
order the SD card destroyed.”
“Ordered
SD card destroyed.” - ‘Too sensitive of nature to be released to
the public.’
While
the Judge’s crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s, Mr Paterson
spent the free time, (and for the purposes of the tape) to again
speak about the 788-790 Finchley Road boiler room fraud.
- Costs claimed at £19,944.89
Wrapped up by 11.45 am.
As
the proceedings wrapped up and the public gallery emptied, the
Fantastic Four (Frank, David, Bryn and Tony) flew the International
Tribes flag for the first time in a British Court of law.
No comments:
Post a Comment