The Queen is said to be furious that her son Andrew should be named as having sex with an under-aged girl.
This is far from the truth; more accurately, the Queen is panicking with dread that her husband and eldest son will soon be ousted as paedophiles too, who regular have sex with girls much younger than 17 years old.
To think the Royal family weren't aware of this impending PR disaster; you really have got you head buried deep in the sand.
As seen from a seasoned Royal reporters point of view, the first hint that not was all well in the
household came with the news that the Queen was contemplating abdicating in December 2014.
Flagged up by the betting giant Coral, they suspended all betting that The Queen would announce her abdication in her Christmas Day speech.
Absolutely ridiculous from the very start; the facts remained:
- The speech to the nation has already been pre-recorded by the BBC a month earlier.
- It began with a £200 bet, followed by several smaller bets in quick succession.
A seasoned Royal reporter would say this exercise was a well planned PR stunt to gauge the reaction of a possible abdication.
It was clear within 24 hours that many saw the Queen abdication as a joke and something which would never happened in a million years. Even sources close to the Queen joined in and laughed off suggestions that she might abdicate, saying it was “just not true.”
Hence the bottom line being the British people wouldn't tolerate an abdication, as has happened with the abdications of the King Juan Carlos of
Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands.
- Read more: Dutch Queen Beatrix abdicates in favour of son.
- Read more: Spain King: Juan Carlos signs his abdication.
Previous to the abdication scare, trolls from inside Buckingham Palace even tried to peddle a story that the Queen was dying; losing her mind with Alzheimer’s Disease; but again the British public weren't buying any of it and planners at Buckingham Palace were forced to go back to the drawing board.
Many people will be wondering why The Queen is so keen to slip away quietly and abandon the responsibility of Monarchy.
The answer is very simple and earth-shattering. The Queen is guilty of:
- Crimes against Humanity
- High Treason against the British People
- Aiding and abetting European and World-wide paedophile rings.
In the same way her ancestors were beheaded by their subjects, history is repeating itself and with every passing moment, the Queen and her cohorts are getting closer and closer to the gallows.
QUEEN ELIZABETH II V’S KING JOHN II
|King John II - John Wanoa|
This is just one reason
is in blind panic, the other being that the Yewtree police investigation into historical
child-abuse has implicated her husband Prince Philip as a regular visitor to
the Elm Guest house which is at the centre of their investigation. Buckingham Palace
Read more: Time-bomb at Elm Guest House: Pop stars, a bishop and a top politician appear on a list seized by police investigating child-abuse.
Driving incognito, Prince Philip is said to own a black
London cab which he used
to drive there with his good friend and shagging partner, Michael Middleton,
Kate Middleton’s father.
|King William IV|
King John II, aka John Wanoa from
New Zealand has used King William
IV’s authority to sack Elizabeth Windsor as the Head Trustee of King William
IV’s trust fund which was bequeathed to the British and Common Wealth people.
Only another monarch can depose a monarch, and it’s fit and proper that a Common Wealth King is the person to deliver the fatal blow.
Using Facebook as his world-court, which by Law he has every right to do, because what you say on Facebook can be used against you in a court of law. King John II has posted affidavits against Queen Elizabeth Windsor, which haven’t been contested, which in itself indicates she is guilty of everything John Wanoa has accused her of.
“SHE’S SACKED OFF.”
And now we see a shamed Prince Andrew scuttle back to Mummy, who is said to be furious.
NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.
Crisis talks were held on Christmas Day at
where every member of the Royal family were present, with the notably exceptions
of Prince George
and Camilla the Duchess of York.
Read more: The Queen’s Christmas Service.
Safe behind locked doors, the stark facts were revealed to a shocked family. The reign of the
royal family is coming to an end; with the discussion soon turning to how to
survive it and come out with their heads still attached to their bodies.
Thus the grand plan: Make Prince Andrew the scapegoat in the attempt to hide the bigger story that the real paedophiles in the royal family are Prince Philip and Prince Charles.
Media savvy insiders know that whenever a big story is broken, it’s usually broken and timed to hide an even bigger and more damaging story from reaching the public.
This is what is happening here. Prince Andrew having sex with a 17-year-old-girl is a better headline to endure than the headline calling Prince Philip a paedophile and his son one too.
Read more: Is Prince Charles a Paedophile?
Read more: Prince Philip: The sickest man in the
While you are at it, I also recommend you read: Who murdered Mountbatten?
It’s funny reading the statement
was forced to release after sustained world-wide attention and pressure. Buckingham Palace
“It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”
Where have we heard that before? Easy isn’t it! Bill Clinton in 1998!
“I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”
Read more: The Story of the Century.