The story of King Arthur has captivated imaginations for centuries, often shrouded in myth and legend. However, researchers Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett propose a compelling and controversial narrative: there were two historical King Arthurs, and their contributions to British history have been largely misunderstood or overlooked. Their extensive research, which spans over three decades, seeks to redefine our understanding of ancient British history.
The Concept of Two Arthurs.
Wilson and Blackett argue that the traditional account of King Arthur conflates two distinct historical figures:
1. King Arthur I: A leader from the Roman period, around the 3rd to 4th century AD.
2. King Arthur II: A 6th-century warlord who led the Britons against Saxon invaders.
Their hypothesis suggests that King Arthur II was a real historical figure who ruled in the region now known as Glamorgan in South Wales. This Arthur is believed to have been a formidable leader who played a crucial role in the defense of Britain during a time of significant upheaval.
READ MORE:
- https://glamorgannwg.org/events/an-introduction-to-britains-hidden-history/
- https://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/2023/03/britains-hidden-history-rally-round.html
Evidence and Controversies.
Wilson and Blackett’s research delves into various sources of evidence to support their claims:
- Ancient Scripts and Inscriptions: They utilize the Coelbren Alphabet, an ancient Welsh script, to decipher historical texts and inscriptions. This has led them to reinterpret existing artifacts and monuments, offering a new perspective on British history
- Historical Accounts and Genealogies: They revisit medieval chronicles and genealogical records, which they believe have been misinterpreted by mainstream historians.
- Archaeological Findings: The researchers also point to physical evidence, such as ancient fortifications and burial sites in South Wales, which they argue align with their narrative of King Arthur II's reign.
Despite these efforts, their work remains highly controversial. Mainstream historians often challenge their interpretations, citing a lack of definitive proof and questioning the methodologies used. Nevertheless, the persistence of Wilson and Blackett in bringing these theories to light has sparked significant interest and debate.
Cultural and Historical Impact.
The work of Wilson and Blackett extends beyond academic circles, influencing popular perceptions of British history. Ross Broadstock has been instrumental in promoting their findings through various media, including books, websites, and YouTube channels. His efforts have helped disseminate their theories to a broader audience, encouraging a reevaluation of historical narratives.
In Conclusion.
The research of Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett invites us to reconsider the stories we accept as history. By challenging established narratives and offering new interpretations, they highlight the complexity of our past and the importance of questioning historical consensus. Whether their claims about King Arthur II are ultimately validated or not, their work underscores the dynamic nature of historical inquiry and the enduring fascination with the legendary king.
For further reading and detailed explorations of their theories, you can visit the following sources:
- Glamorgannwg Indigenous People - https://glamorgannwg.org
- Britain’s Hidden History YouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/@BritainsHiddenHistory
- Rich Planet - https://www.richplanet.net
