Tuesday, 30 January 2024

Ten reasons why I believe satanist James Hind (not his real name,) is a paedophile.

As if I give a flying fuck for the opinion of a Satanic Pest/Paedophile Scum Bag!

As I wrote on ExposingJamesHind.wordpress.com, Sussex Police have written alot of stuff on paper about me, but none of it makes it true.

Opinions are like arseholes; Everyone has got one!

I really don't give a flying fuck what the opinions are of the satanic pest and paedophile scumbag James Hind.

Ten Reasons why I think James Hind is a sick satanic paedophile.

1. He wants to know everything about paedophilia.

2. He allowed a paedophile groomer from Kent to carry on grooming because he couldn't live with the thought of ruining a paedophile's life on his mind.

Extract from SatanicViews - Nov 2018
AI depiction of the paedophile groomer from Kent

3. He supports alleged satanic paedophiles like the ex husband of Samantha Baldwin and the father in the Wilfred Wong case.

4. He shares disturbing imagery of child abuse, babies being eaten and children being kidnapped.

5. He pretends to be a 12 year old boy online.

Extract from SatanicViews - Nov 2018

6. He speaks to and shares very disturbing illegal content of the top level with children as young as 11 years old.

Extract from SatanicViews - Nov 2018

7. He's obsessed and fixated with children and sees himself as their saviour and Black Knight hero.

8. He emotionally abused three teenage boys following the sudden and tragic death of their father.

9. He sexualised an innocent picture of a new born baby, seeing an erect penis, when everyone else sees an umbilical cord.

10. He doesn't believe in Good or Evil, and views himself as his own God, with no higher authority above him.

Read more: Is James Hind a Paedophile? Too fucking right James Hind is a paedophile.

Make no mistake, James Hind (not his real name,) is a bona-afide satanic paedophile.

Plus he's fucking loopy and deranged!

He's not right in the head!

DisclaimerThe content portrayed within this blog is a commentary and critique of a public individual, and is presented within the legal framework of fair usage, personal expression and the prevention, detection and investigation of crime. It should in no way be interpreted as incitement or encouragement of any act of violence or other criminal conduct, and is meant for purposes of discussion only. Viewer discretion is advised, and all content is intended for mature audiences.

No comments:

Post a Comment