Flawed Life Coach Ben Hornsby

 

“I received an anonymous email from a reliable source accusing Ben of spiking the drinks of the local Bali girl’s with rohnpnol.”

Theft is theft. Whether you burgle a house and snatch a wad of money from a window sill, to stealing an OAP’s bank card and withdrawing their money from the cash machine.

Both examples are theft.

But yet the flawed Life Coach Ben Hornsby, currently holed up in Bali, thinks that stealing money from an OAP’s bank account, is far worst than burgling a property and snatching money from the window sill.

“I received an anonymous email from a reliable source accusing Ben of spiking the drinks of the local Bali girl’s with rohnpnol.”

He recently went onto Ann Drogyne’s YouTube channel and the first thing he said was, “I want to say something to you, you was right about them nonces in my channel. We were having a bit of a chit for chat at the time and I didn’t believe you, but it was strange because I got an email of somebody, proving that that person, and another person, are nonces. They’re blocked, and you were right, so sorry for not believing you.”

Ben had already alluded to receiving an email from someone, sharing a news article about my mate Convid, real name Justin.

Ben defends his crimes by saying he was suffering from addiction while committing those crimes, but yet that is the very same reason Justin gave!

That aside, I asked Ben who he was referring to when he said “nonces”?

Ben was quick to reply, “It’s not about you, it’s about someone else, your mate. Yeah to keep myself safe, but he’s your mate, and I’ve got proof, evidence, paperwork, the lot.”

This contradicts what he said when he appeared on Ann Drogyne’s show on Friday night, when he said, “it was strange because I got an email of somebody, proving that that person, and another person, are nonces.”

By saying, “that person,” I believe Ben was alluding to my mate Justin, and by saying, “and another person,” I thought he was alluding to myself, but when confronted, he backed tracked, saying, “its not about you, it’s about someone else, your mate.”

So I went back to Ann Drogyne, to establish what was said during their so called, “chit for chat”.

As ex Police staff herself, Ann would know better than anyone, the pitfuls of falsely calling people “nonces.”

To which Ann was kind enough to clarify:

This confirms that Ann Drogyne wasn’t referring to Justin or I, as Ben alluded she was, but was in fact referring to the notorious YouTube troll called The Mouse.

“Matt, you are weird but I’ve never called you a danger to children.”

Thus, what can we say about Ben Hornsby after all that?

Skank!

I’m not impressed and won’t be wasting my time watching him on YouTube anymore.

Disclaimer: I wish to make it clear that I haven’t received an anonymous email from a reliable source alleging Ben spikes Bali girl’s with rohnpnol.

I do so to show up Ben’s statement that he received an email, with a link to blah blah blah.I’m making the point we can all make up shit about each other!

Brighton Satan Hunter Matt Taylor back to his predatory ways

After a much needed break from the internet, Matthew Taylor, a mentally ill predatory extremist from Brighton UK, who promotes narratives that his innocent victims harm children for Satan, initially raised hopes he had changed direction rather than abuse the innocent. Leading to his holiday Taylor had been involved in questionable conflicts and conversations with minors (under 18) and was accused of being a paedophile by multiple critics.

One of the first major internet postings by Matthew Taylor was his sharing of extracts from his diary. Taylor documents his thoughts and experiences for years in the form of a detailed personal diary. The diary extracts revealed a troubled delusional and psychotic mind of a man who believed he was destined to lead revolutions, and that the Universe would deliver everything he wanted on a plate to him without his doing any work. The diary also revealed his conflicts and hatred for the daughter of his current “imaginary girlfriend”, that adds to information I already knew about his similar problems with the son of that girlfriend.

Taylor continues to believe in and promote a series of delusions, whose reality is limited to his social media postings. Taylor claims he will be elected as the next member of parliament in Brighton and Kemptown, even though he has done no work in his community and had invited people who did vote for him to “kiss his arse”. Taylor says as if it is fact that he will replace King Charles III with a sectioned fraudster and non-British Maori from New Zealand called John Wanoa, but seems to have ignored the reality many in Britain would oppose that outcome. Taylor also claims to have £21 billion from a Saudi prince without evidence, and says this is for a Brighton theme park and film studios, again without any efforts to make this vision happen. Taylor’s 13-year-old son features in his delusions where he claims he will be King Arthur in his six movies; he also claims he and his son will withdraw to Hong Kong in five years leaving his business empire being run by others; Taylor appears to be ignorant that Hong Kong is now part of China and would be very hostile to the internet antics that Taylor gets away with in the UK.

Alarmingly Taylor has returned to his old predatory activities by stalking and harassing two recent victims. A YouTuber called Grobnob had disclosed in videos that his relationship with someone had ended, to which Matthew Taylor started an abusive series of social media posts to abuse and humiliate him. Another individual by the name of “AJ” was the target of ridicule and abuse over the death of their own partner by Taylor. It appears that Matthew Taylor has returned to full form of being a vile predator who uses a portfolio of victims as his subjects, using their fear and distress as the canvas for the entertainment of the few who still watch him.

The recent vacation of Taylor has had an impact that interest in his social media has dropped significantly, with even I paying less attention to him; and he is noted with several recent endings of relationships with people who once supported him.

A Message to those who are Not Vaccinated.

2023.10.01.

Even if I was fully vaccinated, I would admire the unvaccinated for resisting the greatest pressure I have ever seen, including pressure from spouse, parents, children, friends, colleagues and doctors.

People who have been able to characterize such personality, courage and such critical abilities certainly embody the best characteristics of humanity.

They are everywhere, of all ages, education levels, countries and views.

They are a special kind; these are the warriors that any army of Light would like to have in their ranks.

These are the parents that every child wishes to have and the children that every parent dreams of having.

You are made of the greatest people to ever live, those heroes born among ordinary people and glow in the dark.

They are beings beyond the average of their societies;

They are the essence of nations that created all cultures and conquered horizons.

They did what others couldn't, they were the tree that withstood the storm of abuse, discrimination and social separation.

They did it because they thought they were lonely and believed they were the only ones.

They were banned from sitting at their family tables at Christmas, but they had never seen anything so cruel.

They lost their jobs, lost their careers, they were out of money...

but they didn't care.

They have experienced unmeasurable discrimination, condemnation, betrayal and humiliation... but they did not stop.

There has never been such a selection in Humanity - now we know who is the best on Planet Earth.

Women, men, old, young, rich, poor, people of various races and religions, the unvaccinated, the chosen ones of the invisible ark, the only ones who managed to stand when it all fell apart.

It is YOU, You passed an unimaginable test that many of the toughest Marines, commanders, green berets, astronauts and geniuses could not.

You are made of heroes who ever lived,

heroes born among ordinary people and shine in the dark.

* * * * *

Despite years of pressure campaigns, discriminatory policies, social separation, loss of income, threats and death accusations, French General Christian Blanchon thanked the "unvaccinated" for their strength, courage and leadership.

The author is unknown. 2022.10.28.

Taylor's Diaries - Available Now!

 

Taylor's Diaries… – A collection of Taylor's Diaries…

King Charles III called a “Fusspot”. The King’s temper is being called into question.

The King’s temper has been called into question, with some calling him a 'fusspot.' It is said that the king's mood swings can be unpredictable, and it is rumoured that he can be easily agitated. This has led to some questioning whether he has the temperament to serve as the head of state. It is important for leaders to be calm, collected, and able to work under pressure, so these concerns about the king's temper are not to be taken lightly.

Control your temper

During a three-day state visit to France, Queen Camilla, at the age of 76, experienced the full force of King Charles III's wrath. It is understood that Queen Camilla was berated by the King for walking too slowly during another public engagement, leading to a heated argument between them in front of the public and media. This outburst by the King demonstrates his short temper and highlights the tension between him and his wife, as well as their differing opinions on public engagements. It also raises questions about his leadership skills, particularly in social engagements and interactions.

"Charles is very businesslike on tour and gets stressed if anything holds them up. It's not making things easy," a royal insider said.

At his Accession Council on September 10, 2022, the new monarch was filmed gritting his teeth in anger and frustration when an aide was slow to move pens off a small table. At that moment in time when the only job he had to do was sign on the dotted line, the King lost it and shamed himself in the eyes of his subjects forever.

King Charles III's Accession Council was a historic moment in the monarchy, as the new monarch took his place as the head of state, but the occasion was overshadowed by an embarrassing outburst from the king when he lost his temper over a minor inconvenience. 

The incident has raised questions about the king's temperament, with some questioning his competence and ability to lead. It is important for leaders to maintain composure in difficult situations, and this incident has caused many to question whether King Charles III is the right person for the job.

After the viral moment at the Accession Council, King Charles III continued to exhibit his short temper. During a signing ceremony in Northern Ireland, he snapped in frustration when a pen leaked all over his hands, causing even more embarrassment and criticism. With growing concerns about his temperament, many are starting to question whether King Charles III is the right person to lead the United Kingdom.

In addition to his recent outbursts, King Charles III snapped at an assistant for arriving early at Westminster Abbey during his coronation on May 6th. This only continued to fuel the growing anger and discontent from both the public and the media, as many viewed this as a sign of a man who is unfit to lead the country. King Charles III is now struggling to remain a unifying force, and his continued displays of temper are damaging his reputation and credibility.

The fact that 'The Firm' felt it necessary to deploy armed guards at the gates of Balmoral, as Queen Elizabeth II's body was repatriated back to England, speaks volumes about the state of mind of the monarchy. It suggests a level of fear and mistrust between the monarchy and the public, as they are concerned that their subjects might discover the truth about them. The deployment of armed guards implies a sense of intimidation and the desire to control the narrative, indicating that the monarchy is deeply concerned about maintaining a positive image and retaining the loyalty of their subjects.

LIVE WITH BUMBLEBEETV! CHARLES III TO BE PROCLAIMED KING IN ACCESSION CEREMONY

First published at 17:37 on September 11th, 2022.

Why didn't Jo Wadsworth include the word "alleged"?

The journalistic integrities of Brighton and Hove's famous news hack Frank Le Duc and BHN's editor Jo Wadsworth, have been called into question by the citizen journalist Matt Taylor, independent Parliamentary candidate for Brighton Kemptown 2024.

Journalistic integrity is a term used to describe the ethical standards and principles that journalists should abide by when gathering and reporting information. It encompasses a range of principles including accuracy, neutrality, independence, impartiality, and honesty, all of which serve to protect the integrity of the profession. These principles are essential for maintaining trust and credibility within the news media and for safeguarding society's right to know. 

A complaint against Jo Wadsworth has been sent to Frank Le Duc and as of publication, there has been no reply.

Faces disguised for privacy reasons

Matt Taylor's complaint against Jo Wadsworth in full:

On Thursday 1 Oct, 2020 at 4:18PM, an article written by Jo Wadworth was published on the Brighton and Hove News website, with the headline, “Conspiracy theorist given suspended sentence over fake Satanic abuse claims.”

Within the article, Jo Wadsworth referred to me as “a notorious Brighton conspiracy theorist,” who had been given a suspended jail sentence for “spreading fake Satanic abuse claims.”

This is in itself false reporting, because I used the word, “alleged,” which was posted on the public court documents, and a significant word, which changes the whole ethos and meaning of the story, which Jo Wadsworth chose to omit, and by doing so, changing the whole truth of the story.

Jo Wadsworth chooses to distort the FACTS of the story, to sell a false narrative based on her own personal prejudice against me.

Jo Wadsworth goes on to falsely state that I had “harassed ****** police and crime commissioner (PCC) **** ******.”

I have never been charged with harassment of **** ****** and nor have I been convicted of harassing **** ******.

Jo Wadsworth falsely claimed I “fabricated claims,” about a certain London actor, that he abused children and drank babies blood.

Again, Jo Wadsworth is intentionally omitting the word “alleged,” which changes the whole story if it was included.

A word which was printed on the public court documents, and a word which Jo Wadsworth choose to omit because she held a preconceived and prejudicial opinion of me, having in July 2019, replied to me, “Matt, you bombarded us with the emails that were pretty much proof of your stalking claims. I'm staggered you were never convicted.”

For your information, Sussex Police are currently investigating a complaint I’ve made against two individuals who have continually been harassing and stalking me since 2017, who use Jo Wadsworth’s article as their tool of harassment.

Within my complaint, I claim these two individuals are also responsible for pretending to be ***** *******, who I believed was making derogatory and malicious comments towards me. It was a direct result of these provocations, that I published a series of videos and social media posts from June 2019 to February 2020 in which I referred to ***** ******* as an “Alleged Satanic cult leader.”

Jo Wadsworth wrote the following, “Based on these discredited claims, Taylor, 49, made and published a series of videos and social media posts from June 2019 to February 2020 in which he referred to ***** ******* as a Satanic cult leader.”

She clearly and intentionally chose to omit the word “alleged.” And in doing so, distorted the FACTS of the story to suit her own narrative towards me, that I ought to already be convicted for harassment, citing me bombarding BHN with emails.

Claiming I started making “outlandish allegations” against the *PCC, is an offensive to the victims of Sussex Police corruption.

Do you really think it's warranted for a 74 year old man, be sent to prison for allegedly sending a threatening email?

Man, 74, sent ****** police commissioner menacing email - BBC News

If you can’t see the bigger picture here, you shouldn’t be calling yourselves journalists.

On Wednesday 6 May, 2020 at 3:03PM, an article written by Jo Wadsworth was published in the Brighton and Hove News website, with the headline, “Police commissioner’s harasser ordered not to stalk her lawyer.”

Within the comment section, two years ago, a person identifying as Ace, made the following comment:

“It appears a certain obsessive internet Troll appears obsessed with this man, including making the false allegation he’s a stalker? Matt Taylor has not, to the best of my understanding, been convicted of stalking. A stalking protection order is not the same as a harassment charge; however, it appears said troll appears hell-bent on muddying water in their attempt to conflate one with the other. If you are going to go around mouthing off about all and sundry then at least try to get your facts right.”

Ace was making the factual point that I have never been convicted of stalking, and that a stalking protection (should be Prevention) order is not the same as a harassment charge. 

This is correct, and Ace was correct to state, “it appears said troll appears hell-bent on muddying water in their attempt to conflate one with the other. If you are going to go around mouthing off about all and sundry then at least try to get your facts right.”

To which Jo Wadsworth replied;

“Hi Ace,

Matthew Taylor was convicted of harassment on 1 October last year:

https://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2020/10/01/conspiracy-theorist-given-suspended-sentence-over-fake-satanic-abuse-claims/

We haven’t claimed that he has been convicted of stalking. However, it is accurate to say he has been made the subject of a stalking order.”

Two years later, having been reminded of the article, because this is the article which is always referred to, I wrote the following only 2 days ago.

“Correction. I wasn’t and have never been convicted of harassment on 1 October 2019.

I was at the RCJ for an injunction against me blogging, and I was found in contempt of that order, nothing to do with stalking.

Get your facts straight Jo.”

I believe Jo Wadsworth has gotten her facts mixed up. Having written the article in May 2020, and referring to being convicted of harassment on 01 October last year, Jo Wadsworth was referring to the events at the RJC concerning **** ******, which happened in October 2018.

As acknowledged by Jo Wadsworth within her own reporting;

“Eventually, a court imposed a civil injunction to prevent him from contacting or writing about her. In October 2018, he was given a four-year sentence suspended for two years for breaching the order.”

This confirms that I have never been charged or convicted of stalking. And that by stating I was convicted of harassment in October 2019, distorts that fact, that I was in fact found guilty of contempt, against a civil injunction preventing me from contacting or writing about her.

And again, Jo Wadsworth incorrectly reports I was given a four-year sentence, when it was four months.

AGAIN, GETTING THE FACTS WRONG.

• WRONG: I was not found guilty of harassment on 01 October 2019. 

• RIGHT: I was found guilty of contempt in October 2018

• WRONG: I did not call ***** ******* a “satanic cult leader.”

• RIGHT: I did call ***** ******* an “alleged satanic cult leader.”

• WRONG: I was given a four year suspended sentence.

• RIGHT: I was given a four month suspended sentence.

Two days ago, Jo Wadsworth left the following comment:

“Hi Matt, you’re right, it was 8 September, 2020. You were sentenced on 30 September, 2020 (the story I linked to has these dates right, I got slightly muddled when making the comment, apologies for that).

I’ve just gone back and double checked, and I would be happy to send you an extract of the court results confirming you were found guilty of harassment at the morning session in courtroom 1 of Brighton Magistrates Court. The full charge was:

BETWEEN 26/06/2019 – 13/02/2020 at BRIGHTON IN THE COUNTY OF
SUSSEX pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of
***** ******* and which you knew or ought to have known amounted to
the harassment of him in that YOU MADE AND PUBLISHED A SERIES OF
VIDEOS AND SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS IN WHICH YOU REFERRED TO ***** ******* AS AN ALLEGED SATANIC CULT LEADER.
Contrary to section 2(1) and (2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
ASN/Seq No.: 1900000000001044416N/003”

To which I left a comment, which was removed from the BHN website, and a comment I sent Jo Wadsworth via Twitter.

“Thank you for your correction.”

To which Jo Wadsworth replied:

“It's not a correction - I never claimed you had been convicted of harassing **** ******. I correctly said you had been convicted of harassing someone else.”

I believe I have demonstrated that Jo Wadsworth’s journalism has fallen short of professional.

I wasn't found guilty of harassment on 01 Oct 2019, as Jo Wadsworth reported I was. 

This is incorrect. I was found guilty of contempt, of an injunction preventing me from blogging about ****** PCC. No mention of harassment or stalking. 

Jo Wadsworth’s false reporting of my story has resulted in prolonged and exhaustive harassment and stalking against me, and other innocent third parties. 

I wish this to be my formal complaint against Jo Wadsworth.

Yours sincerely,

Matthew Taylor

Independent Parliamentary Candidate for Brighton Kemptown 2024

www.Brighton2222Project.wordpress.com

www.KingArthursPoliticalParty.wordpress.com

GUERRILLA DEMOCRACY NEWS: Brighton 2222 Project! Is Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman coming to Moulsecoomb in Brighton?